Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Aug 3;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01051-2.
This study investigated plasma biomarkers for neuroinflammation associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in subjects with preclinical AD compared to healthy elderly. How these biomarkers behave in patients with AD, compared to healthy elderly is well known, but determining these in subjects with preclinical AD is not and will add information related to the onset of AD. When found to be different in preclinical AD, these inflammatory biomarkers may be used to select preclinical AD subjects who are most likely to develop AD, to participate in clinical trials with new disease-modifying drugs.
Healthy elderly (n= 50; age 71.9; MMSE >24) and subjects with preclinical AD (n=50; age 73.4; MMSE >24) defined by CSF Aβ1-42 levels < 1000 pg/mL were included. Four neuroinflammatory biomarkers were determined in plasma, GFAP, YKL-40, MCP-1, and eotaxin-1. Differences in biomarker outcomes were compared using ANCOVA. Subject characteristics age, gender, and APOE ε4 status were reported per group and were covariates in the ANCOVA. Least square means were calculated for all 4 inflammatory biomarkers using both the Aβ+/Aβ- cutoff and Ptau/Aβ1-42 ratio.
The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the subjects (n=100) was 72.6 (4.6) years old with 62 male and 38 female subjects. Mean (SD) overall MMSE score was 28.7 (0.49) and 32 subjects were APOE ε4 carriers. The number of subjects in the different APOE ε4 status categories differed significantly between the Aβ+ and Aβ- groups. Plasma GFAP concentration was significantly higher in the Aβ+ group compared to the Aβ- group with significant covariates age and sex, variables that also correlated significantly with GFAP.
GFAP was significantly higher in subjects with preclinical AD compared to healthy elderly which agrees with previous studies. When defining preclinical AD based on the Ptau181/Aβ1-42 ratio, YKL-40 was also significantly different between groups. This could indicate that GFAP and YKL-40 are more sensitive markers of the inflammatory process in response to the Aβ misfolding and aggregation that is ongoing as indicated by the lowered Aβ1-42 levels in the CSF. Characterizing subjects with preclinical AD using neuroinflammatory biomarkers is important for subject selection in new disease-modifying clinical trials.
ISRCTN.org identifier: ISRCTN79036545 (retrospectively registered).
本研究旨在比较临床前 AD 患者与健康老年人的神经炎症相关血浆生物标志物,以调查 AD 相关的神经炎症生物标志物。与健康老年人相比,这些生物标志物在 AD 患者中的表现众所周知,但在临床前 AD 患者中确定这些生物标志物的表现却并非如此,这将提供与 AD 发病相关的信息。如果在临床前 AD 中发现这些炎症生物标志物存在差异,那么它们可能被用于选择最有可能发展为 AD 的临床前 AD 患者,以参与新的疾病修饰药物的临床试验。
本研究纳入了健康老年人(n=50;年龄 71.9;MMSE>24)和临床前 AD 患者(n=50;年龄 73.4;MMSE>24),其脑脊液 Aβ1-42 水平<1000pg/ml。检测了血浆中的 4 种神经炎症生物标志物:GFAP、YKL-40、MCP-1 和 eotaxin-1。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较生物标志物的差异。报告了每组的年龄、性别和 APOE ε4 状态等特征,并将其作为 ANCOVA 的协变量。使用 Aβ+/Aβ- 截断值和 Ptau/Aβ1-42 比值计算所有 4 种炎症生物标志物的最小二乘均数。
100 例受试者的平均(标准差,SD)年龄为 72.6(4.6)岁,其中 62 例为男性,38 例为女性。总 MMSE 评分的平均值(SD)为 28.7(0.49),32 例为 APOE ε4 携带者。不同 APOE ε4 状态类别的受试者数量在 Aβ+和 Aβ- 组之间存在显著差异。与 Aβ- 组相比,Aβ+组的 GFAP 浓度显著升高,且具有显著的协变量年龄和性别,这两个变量与 GFAP 也显著相关。
与健康老年人相比,临床前 AD 患者的 GFAP 显著升高,这与之前的研究结果一致。当根据 Ptau181/Aβ1-42 比值定义临床前 AD 时,YKL-40 组间差异也具有统计学意义。这可能表明,GFAP 和 YKL-40 是对 CSF 中 Aβ1-42 水平降低所反映的 Aβ 错误折叠和聚集的炎症反应更敏感的标志物。使用神经炎症生物标志物对临床前 AD 患者进行特征描述,对于新的疾病修饰临床试验中的患者选择非常重要。
ISRCTN.org 标识符:ISRCTN79036545(事后注册)。