Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
The Korean Institute of Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022063. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022063. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Different approaches for analyzing repeated dietary measurements may yield differences in the magnitude and interpretation of findings. We aimed to compare 3 dietary measurements (baseline, most recent, and cumulative average) in terms of the association between plant-based diet indices (PDIs) and incident abdominal obesity in Korean adults aged 40-69 years.
This study included 6,054 participants (54% women) free of abdominal obesity (defined as waist circumference ≥90 cm for men and ≥85 cm for women) at baseline. As exposures, baseline, most recent, and cumulative average measurements for PDI, healthy-PDI (hPDI), and unhealthy-PDI (uPDI) were created. A Cox proportional-hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for abdominal obesity.
During 45,818 person-years of follow-up (median, 9 years), we identified 1,778 incident cases of abdominal obesity. In the multivariable-adjusted analysis, a higher uPDI was associated with a higher risk of abdominal obesity in both total and stratified analyses. The findings were consistent across all approaches (Q5 vs. Q1: HRbaseline=1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 1.98; HRmost recent=1.52; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.78; HRcumulative average=1.76; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.06 in the total set). PDI showed no meaningful association with abdominal obesity risk in any analyses. hPDIaverage had a suggestive inverse association with abdominal obesity risk in men, and hPDIbaseline had a positive association with abdominal obesity risk in women.
Greater adherence to unhealthy plant-based diets may increase the risk of developing abdominal obesity in Korean adults. The findings were generally consistent across all approaches.
分析重复饮食测量的不同方法可能会导致研究结果的幅度和解释存在差异。我们旨在比较 3 种饮食测量方法(基线、最近和累积平均值)在植物性饮食指数(PDI)与韩国 40-69 岁成年人腹部肥胖发生的关联方面的差异。
本研究纳入了 6054 名参与者(54%为女性),他们在基线时无腹部肥胖(定义为男性腰围≥90cm,女性腰围≥85cm)。将基线、最近和累积平均值的 PDI、健康 PDI(hPDI)和不健康 PDI(uPDI)作为暴露因素进行研究。采用 Cox 比例风险模型估计腹部肥胖的风险比(HR)。
在 45818 人年的随访期间(中位数为 9 年),共发现 1778 例腹部肥胖新发病例。在多变量调整分析中,较高的 uPDI 与总人群和分层分析中的腹部肥胖风险升高相关。这些发现与所有方法均一致(Q5 与 Q1:HRbaseline=1.70;95%置信区间[CI]:1.46 至 1.98;HRmost recent=1.52;95%CI:1.30 至 1.78;HRcumulative average=1.76;95%CI:1.51 至 2.06)。PDI 与腹部肥胖风险无明显关联。hPDIaverage 与男性腹部肥胖风险呈负相关,hPDIbaseline 与女性腹部肥胖风险呈正相关。
较高的不健康植物性饮食依从性可能会增加韩国成年人发生腹部肥胖的风险。这些发现与所有方法基本一致。