• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持单次交互交换。

Holds enable one-shot reciprocal exchange.

机构信息

School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 10;289(1980):20220723. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0723.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2022.0723
PMID:35946153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9364007/
Abstract

Strangers routinely cooperate and exchange goods without any knowledge of one another in one-off encounters without recourse to a third party, an interaction that is fundamental to most human societies. However, this act of reciprocal exchange entails the risk of the other agent defecting with both goods. We examine the choreography for safe exchange between strangers, and identify the minimum requirement, which is a shared hold, either of an object, or the other party; we show that competing agents will settle on exchange as a local optimum in the space of payoffs. Truly safe exchanges are rarely seen in practice, even though unsafe exchange could mean that risk-averse agents might avoid such interactions. We show that an 'implicit' hold, whereby an actor believes that they could establish a hold if the other agent looked to be defecting, is sufficient to enable the simple swaps that are the hallmark of human interactions and presumably provide an acceptable trade-off between risk and convenience. We explicitly consider the particular case of purchasing, where money is one of the goods.

摘要

陌生人在一次性相遇中,在彼此不了解的情况下,经常进行合作和商品交换,而无需诉诸第三方,这种互动是大多数人类社会的基础。然而,这种互惠交换的行为伴随着对方带着货物违约的风险。我们研究了陌生人之间安全交换的舞蹈编排,并确定了最低要求,即共同持有,无论是物品还是对方;我们表明,竞争的代理人将在收益空间中确定交换作为局部最优。在实践中很少看到真正安全的交换,尽管不安全的交换可能意味着风险厌恶的代理人可能会避免这种互动。我们表明,一种“隐含”的持有,即如果另一个代理看起来要违约,一个演员相信他们可以建立一个持有,足以使简单的交换成为人类互动的标志,大概在风险和便利之间提供了可接受的权衡。我们明确考虑了购买的特殊情况,在这种情况下,金钱是一种商品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/e4afc15fc30d/rspb20220723f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/b22933abc46b/rspb20220723f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/823732daefc9/rspb20220723f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/36c65fe61d4e/rspb20220723f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/e4afc15fc30d/rspb20220723f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/b22933abc46b/rspb20220723f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/823732daefc9/rspb20220723f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/36c65fe61d4e/rspb20220723f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a2/9364007/e4afc15fc30d/rspb20220723f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Holds enable one-shot reciprocal exchange.支持单次交互交换。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 10;289(1980):20220723. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0723.
2
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
3
Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation.工作犬在互惠合作中传递不同的任务。
Biol Lett. 2018 Feb;14(2). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0460.
4
Marmoset monkeys evaluate third-party reciprocity.狨猴会评估第三方的互惠行为。
Biol Lett. 2014 May;10(5):20140058. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0058.
5
Capuchin monkeys judge third-party reciprocity.卷尾猴能判断第三方的互惠行为。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
6
[Comparison of the effects of exchange forms on social solidarity].[交换形式对社会团结的影响比较]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2012 Apr;83(1):27-34. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.83.27.
7
Institutionalize Reciprocity to Overcome the Public Goods Provision Problem.将互惠制度化以克服公共物品提供问题。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 1;11(6):e0154321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154321. eCollection 2016.
8
Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.直觉、深思熟虑与合作的演变
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517780113. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.具有集体风险的阈值公共品博弈中社会合作的出现
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jul;80(1 Pt 2):016101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016101. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
10
Reciprocity With Unequal Payoffs: Cooperative and Uncooperative Interactions Affect Disadvantageous Inequity Aversion.不等回报下的互惠:合作与非合作互动影响不利不平等厌恶。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;12:628425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628425. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Score-mediated mutual consent and indirect reciprocity.计分介导的相互同意和间接互惠。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2302107120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302107120. Epub 2023 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolution of Egg Trading in Simultaneous Hermaphrodites.同步雌雄同体生物中卵子交易的进化
Am Nat. 2020 Mar;195(3):524-533. doi: 10.1086/707016. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
2
Experimental tests of the tolerated theft and risk-reduction theories of resource exchange.资源交换的可容忍盗窃和风险降低理论的实验检验。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):383-388. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0356-x. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
3
Reciprocal Trading of Different Commodities in Norway Rats.挪威鼠之间不同商品的互惠交易。
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 19;28(4):594-599.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.058.
4
Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions.声誉,人类社会交往中的一种通用货币。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150100. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0100.
5
Human cooperation.人类合作。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
6
Risk and the evolution of human exchange.风险与人类交换的演化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 7;279(1740):2930-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2614. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
Trading behavior between conspecifics in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)种内个体间的交易行为。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 May;123(2):181-94. doi: 10.1037/a0015092.
8
Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.合作进化的五条规则。
Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1133755.
9
Stochastic Games.随机博弈
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Oct;39(10):1095-100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.10.1095.
10
Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity.通过间接互惠实现合作的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):745-53. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1573.