• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国青年群体中与新冠病毒大流行相关的预防保健行为、乐观偏差、疑病症和群体心理之间的关系。

Relationship between Preventive Health Behavior, Optimistic Bias, Hypochondria, and Mass Psychology in Relation to the Coronavirus Pandemic among Young Adults in Korea.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.

Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159620.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159620
PMID:35954974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368274/
Abstract

The great challenge to global public health caused by the coronavirus pandemic has lasted for two years in Korea. However, Korean young adults seem less compliant with preventive health behaviors than older adults. This study aims to explore the relationship between risk perception variables of optimistic bias, hypochondriasis, and mass psychology, and preventive health behavior in relation to the coronavirus pandemic through a cross-sectional online survey. The participants are 91 Korean young adults aged 19-30. The results show that mass psychology has a positive relationship with preventive health behavior, whereas optimistic bias and hypochondriasis do not. In detail, people with high or middle levels of mass psychology displayed higher preventive health behavior compared with those who had low levels of mass psychology, and the highest compliance was for wearing a mask, followed by COVID-19 vaccination, whereas the lowest compliance was for influenza vaccination. These findings could be explained by the Korean culture of strong collectivism and the characteristics of COVID-19, which evoked extreme fear globally. The results of this study can be useful for policy establishment in the ongoing prevention of COVID-19 and suggest that mass psychology should be used effectively in planning preventive communication campaigns.

摘要

新冠疫情对全球公共卫生造成了巨大挑战,在韩国已经持续了两年。然而,与老年人相比,韩国的年轻成年人似乎较少遵守预防性行为。本研究旨在通过横断面在线调查,探讨乐观偏差、疑病症和群体心理的风险感知变量与与新冠疫情相关的预防健康行为之间的关系。参与者为 91 名年龄在 19-30 岁的韩国年轻成年人。结果表明,群体心理与预防健康行为呈正相关,而乐观偏差和疑病症则没有。具体而言,与低群体心理的人相比,高或中群体心理的人表现出更高的预防健康行为,其中最高的依从性是戴口罩,其次是接种 COVID-19 疫苗,而最低的依从性是接种流感疫苗。这些发现可以用强烈的集体主义韩国文化和 COVID-19 的特点来解释,这在全球范围内引起了极度恐惧。本研究结果可用于正在进行的 COVID-19 预防政策制定,并表明应在规划预防传播活动时有效利用群体心理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2de6/9368274/473360eb52cc/ijerph-19-09620-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2de6/9368274/473360eb52cc/ijerph-19-09620-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2de6/9368274/473360eb52cc/ijerph-19-09620-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between Preventive Health Behavior, Optimistic Bias, Hypochondria, and Mass Psychology in Relation to the Coronavirus Pandemic among Young Adults in Korea.韩国青年群体中与新冠病毒大流行相关的预防保健行为、乐观偏差、疑病症和群体心理之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159620.
2
Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下的乐观偏差与预防性行为参与。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Infection preventive behaviors and its association with perceived threat and perceived social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: 2020 community health survey.在韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的感染预防行为及其与感知威胁和感知社会因素的关系:2020 年社区卫生调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):1381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13755-z.
4
Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.六个国家 COVID-19 的公众认知、个体特征和预防行为:一项横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 3;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2.
5
Risk perception, preventive behaviors, and vaccination coverage in the Korean population during the 2009-2010 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): comparison between high-risk group and non-high-risk group.2009-2010 年大流行流感 A(H1N1)期间韩国人群的风险感知、预防行为和疫苗接种率:高风险组与非高风险组比较。
PLoS One. 2013 May 17;8(5):e64230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064230. Print 2013.
6
Factors Predicting the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Preventive Behaviors of Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bangkok, Thailand.预测老年人 2019 年冠状病毒病预防行为的因素:泰国曼谷的一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610361.
7
[The relationship between the optimistic bias about cancer and cancer preventive behavior of the Korean, Chinese, American, and Japanese adult residing in Korea].[居住在韩国的韩裔、华裔、美裔及日裔成年人对癌症的乐观偏差与癌症预防行为之间的关系]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010 Feb;40(1):52-9. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.52.
8
Communication inequalities in the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic differences and preventive behaviors in the United States and South Korea.**COVID-19 大流行期间的沟通不平等:美国和韩国的社会经济差异和预防行为。**
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16211-8.
9
Social-ecological factors related to preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.与韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间预防行为相关的社会-生态因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0266264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266264. eCollection 2022.
10
Preventive Behavioral Insights for Emerging Adults: A Survey during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新兴成年人的预防性行为洞察:COVID-19 大流行期间的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052569.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to reduce alcohol consumption predicted by short-form video exposure, media involvement, psychological bias, and cognitive factor.短视频曝光、媒体参与度、心理偏差和认知因素对减少酒精消费意愿的预测作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;15:1213539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1213539. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with the risk perception of COVID-19 infection and severe illness: A cross-sectional study in Japan.与新冠病毒感染及重症风险认知相关的因素:日本的一项横断面研究
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jun;18:101105. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101105. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Are People Optimistically Biased about the Risk of COVID-19 Infection? Lessons from the First Wave of the Pandemic in Europe.人们对感染 COVID-19 的风险是否存在乐观偏见?来自欧洲大流行第一波疫情的教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010436.
3
Preventive Behavioral Insights for Emerging Adults: A Survey during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新兴成年人的预防性行为洞察:COVID-19 大流行期间的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052569.
4
Human responses to Covid-19: The role of optimism bias, perceived severity, and anxiety.人类对新冠病毒的反应:乐观偏差、感知严重程度和焦虑的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110781. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下的乐观偏差与预防性行为参与。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Analysis of the Impact of Health Beliefs and Resource Factors on Preventive Behaviors against the COVID-19 Pandemic.分析健康信念和资源因素对预防 COVID-19 大流行的行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 22;17(22):8666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228666.
7
The optimism bias.乐观偏差。
Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 6;21(23):R941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
8
Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review.大流行期间保护行为的人口统计学和态度决定因素:综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824. doi: 10.1348/135910710X485826. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
9
Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey.与猪流感爆发相关的公众认知、焦虑及行为变化:横断面电话调查
BMJ. 2009 Jul 2;339:b2651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2651.
10
Is hypochondriasis an anxiety disorder?疑病症是一种焦虑症吗?
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;194(6):481-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061085.