• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者如何理解下尿路症状相关问题?一项关于完成泌尿科问卷时存在问题的定性研究。

How Do Patients Understand Questions about Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms? A Qualitative Study of Problems in Completing Urological Questionnaires.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9650. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159650.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159650
PMID:35955002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368298/
Abstract

Lower urinary tract symptoms are common complaints in ageing people. For a urological evaluation of such complaints in men, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is used worldwide. Previous quantitative studies have revealed serious problems in completing this questionnaire. In order to gain insight into the nature and causes of these problems, we conducted a qualitative study. Not only the purely verbal IPSS was studied but also two alternatives, including pictograms: the Visual Prostate Symptom Score (VPSS) and the Score Visuel Prostatique en Image (SVPI). Men aged 40 years and over with an inadequate level of health literacy (IHL; = 18) or an adequate level of health literacy (AHL; = 47) participated. Each participant filled out one of the three questionnaires while thinking aloud. The analysis of their utterances revealed problems in both health literacy groups with form-filling tasks and subtasks for all three questionnaires. Most noticeable were the problems with the IPSS; the terminology and layout of this form led to difficulties. In the VPSS and SVPI, the pictograms sometimes raised problems. As in previous research on form-filling behavior, an overestimation by form designers of form fillers' knowledge and skills seems to be an important explanation for the problems observed.

摘要

下尿路症状是老年人常见的主诉。对于男性此类主诉的泌尿科评估,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)在全球范围内使用。之前的定量研究已经揭示了完成该问卷存在严重问题。为了深入了解这些问题的性质和原因,我们进行了一项定性研究。我们不仅研究了纯粹的口头 IPSS,还研究了两种替代方法,包括图像:视觉前列腺症状评分(VPSS)和 Score Visuel Prostatique en Image(SVPI)。参与者为年龄在 40 岁及以上、健康素养不足(IHL; = 18)或健康素养足够(AHL; = 47)的男性。每位参与者在大声思考的同时填写了三份问卷中的一份。对他们言论的分析揭示了在两个健康素养组中,所有三个问卷的填表任务和子任务都存在问题。最值得注意的是 IPSS 存在问题;该表格的术语和布局导致了困难。在 VPSS 和 SVPI 中,图像有时会引发问题。与之前关于填表行为的研究一样,表格设计者对表格填写者的知识和技能的过高估计似乎是观察到的问题的一个重要解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/94bea0f330f3/ijerph-19-09650-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/5f4b6ee603fc/ijerph-19-09650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/266108c8bd0a/ijerph-19-09650-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/bd3cc5a9b5ea/ijerph-19-09650-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/94bea0f330f3/ijerph-19-09650-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/5f4b6ee603fc/ijerph-19-09650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/266108c8bd0a/ijerph-19-09650-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/bd3cc5a9b5ea/ijerph-19-09650-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fe/9368298/94bea0f330f3/ijerph-19-09650-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do Patients Understand Questions about Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms? A Qualitative Study of Problems in Completing Urological Questionnaires.患者如何理解下尿路症状相关问题?一项关于完成泌尿科问卷时存在问题的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9650. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159650.
2
The visual prostate symptom score is a simple tool to identify and follow up in general practice patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (a study with 1359 patients).视觉前列腺症状评分是一种用于在全科医疗中识别和随访伴有良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状患者的简单工具(一项针对1359名患者的研究)。
Presse Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;47(7-8 Pt 1):e91-e98. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Study of correlation between Visual Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms with reference to Uroflowmetry parameters in Indian population.印度人群下尿路症状患者的尿流率参数与视觉前列腺症状评分和国际前列腺症状评分的相关性研究。
Urologia. 2023 May;90(2):377-380. doi: 10.1177/03915603231157573. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Is new visual prostate symptom score useful as International Prostate Symptom Score in the evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms? A prospective comparison of 2 symptom scores in Turkish society.在评估男性下尿路症状时,新的视觉前列腺症状评分作为国际前列腺症状评分是否有用?土耳其社会中两种症状评分的前瞻性比较。
Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):653-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.057.
5
Comparison of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with the International Prostate Symptom Score and uroflowmetry parameters in assessing men with lower urinary tract symptoms in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Indonesia.在印度尼西亚西托·曼古库苏莫国家综合医院,比较视觉前列腺症状评分与国际前列腺症状评分及尿流率参数在评估下尿路症状男性中的应用。
Prostate Int. 2019 Sep;7(3):91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Validation of a Visual Prostate Symptom Score in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Health Safety Net Hospital.在一家健康安全网医院中,对患有下尿路症状男性的视觉前列腺症状评分进行验证。
Urology. 2015 Aug;86(2):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Correlation of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with International Prostate Symptom Score and Uroflowmetry Parameters in Nepalese Male Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.尼泊尔男性下尿路症状患者视觉前列腺症状评分与国际前列腺症状评分及尿流率参数的相关性
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Apr-Jun;56(206):217-220.
8
Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men by international prostate symptom score and core lower urinary tract symptom score.国际前列腺症状评分和核心下尿路症状评分评估男性下尿路症状。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1512-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10445.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of IPSS and VPSS without any help in LUTS patients: a prospective study.在无任何辅助情况下IPSS与VPSS对下尿路症状患者有效性的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Aging Male. 2018 Sep;21(3):193-199. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2017.1414178. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Comparison of a Visual Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Literature Review.比较视觉前列腺症状评分和国际前列腺症状评分:一项前瞻性多中心研究和文献复习。
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing questions to assess and measure patients' perceived survival benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a mixed methods pilot study.开发评估和测量乳腺癌患者对辅助内分泌治疗的生存获益感知的问题:一项混合方法试点研究。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01261-4.
2
Relationship between interviewer-assisted international prostate symptom score and other objective measures of bladder outlet obstruction in Southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚东南部访谈者协助的国际前列腺症状评分与膀胱出口梗阻其他客观指标之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Nov 21;46:87. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.87.37303. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Visual aids in ambulatory clinical practice: Experiences, perceptions and needs of patients and healthcare professionals.门诊临床实践中的视觉辅助工具:患者和医疗保健专业人员的体验、看法和需求。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263041. eCollection 2022.
2
Luts-V: A new simplified score for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in men.Luts-V:一种用于评估男性下尿路症状的新简化评分系统。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):525-532. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0278.
3
A scoping review of the use of visual aids in health education materials for persons with low-literacy levels.
Minimally Invasive Treatment in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
良性前列腺增生 (BPH) 的微创治疗。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231155000. doi: 10.1177/15330338231155000.
在低识字水平人群的健康教育材料中使用视觉辅助工具的范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):998-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.034. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Comparison of a Visual Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Literature Review.比较视觉前列腺症状评分和国际前列腺症状评分:一项前瞻性多中心研究和文献复习。
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Patient interpretation of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) Short Form.患者对患者主观整体评定量表(PG-SGA)简表的解读。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 16;13:1391-1400. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S204188. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparison of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with the International Prostate Symptom Score and uroflowmetry parameters in assessing men with lower urinary tract symptoms in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Indonesia.在印度尼西亚西托·曼古库苏莫国家综合医院,比较视觉前列腺症状评分与国际前列腺症状评分及尿流率参数在评估下尿路症状男性中的应用。
Prostate Int. 2019 Sep;7(3):91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Prospective comparison of the novel visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) versus the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and assessment of patient pain perception with regard to transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.前瞻性比较新型视觉前列腺症状评分(VPSS)与国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),并评估经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检患者的疼痛感知。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):137-144. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0496.
8
To investigate the correlation between the visual prostate symptom score, the international prostate symptom score, and uroflowmetry parameters in adult Thai males of different educational levels.调查不同教育水平的成年泰国男性的视觉前列腺症状评分、国际前列腺症状评分与尿流率参数之间的相关性。
Prostate Int. 2018 Sep;6(3):115-118. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
9
The visual prostate symptom score is a simple tool to identify and follow up in general practice patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (a study with 1359 patients).视觉前列腺症状评分是一种用于在全科医疗中识别和随访伴有良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状患者的简单工具(一项针对1359名患者的研究)。
Presse Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;47(7-8 Pt 1):e91-e98. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of IPSS and VPSS without any help in LUTS patients: a prospective study.在无任何辅助情况下IPSS与VPSS对下尿路症状患者有效性的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Aging Male. 2018 Sep;21(3):193-199. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2017.1414178. Epub 2017 Dec 11.