Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 15;24(8):e36316. doi: 10.2196/36316.
Cancer screening provision in resource-constrained settings tends to be opportunistic, and uptake tends to be low, leading to delayed presentation and treatment and poor survival.
The aim of this study was to identify, review, map, and summarize findings from different types of literature reviews on the use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve the uptake of cancer screening.
The review methodology was guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Ovid MEDLINE, PyscINFO, and Embase were searched from inception to May 2021. The eligible criteria included reviews that focused on studies of interventions that used mobile phone devices to promote and deliver cancer screening and described the effectiveness or implementation of mHealth intervention outcomes. Key data fields such as study aims, types of cancer, mHealth formats, and outcomes were extracted, and the data were analyzed to address the objective of the review.
Our initial search identified 1981 titles, of which 12 (0.61%) reviews met the inclusion criteria (systematic reviews: n=6, 50%; scoping reviews: n=4, 33%; rapid reviews: n=1, 8%; narrative reviews: n=1, 8%). Most (57/67, 85%) of the interventions targeted breast and cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake. The most commonly used mHealth technologies for increasing cancer screening uptake were SMS text messages and telephone calls. Overall, mHealth interventions increased knowledge about screening and had high acceptance among participants. The likelihood of achieving improved uptake-related outcomes increased when interventions used >1 mode of communication (telephone reminders, physical invitation letters, and educational pamphlets) together with mHealth.
mHealth interventions increase cancer screening uptake, although multiple modes used in combination seem to be more effective.
资源有限的环境中癌症筛查的提供往往是机会性的,而且接受度往往较低,导致就诊和治疗延迟,生存状况较差。
本研究旨在确定、综述、绘制和总结利用移动医疗(mHealth)技术提高癌症筛查接受度的不同类型文献综述的结果。
本综述方法以 PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目,适用于范围综述)为指导。从 Ovid MEDLINE、PyscINFO 和 Embase 数据库的建立到 2021 年 5 月进行了检索。纳入标准包括聚焦于使用移动电话设备来促进和提供癌症筛查的干预措施的研究,以及描述 mHealth 干预结果的有效性或实施情况的综述。提取了研究目的、癌症类型、mHealth 形式和结果等关键数据字段,并对数据进行了分析以实现综述目标。
我们最初的搜索确定了 1981 个标题,其中 12 篇(0.61%)综述符合纳入标准(系统评价:n=6,50%;范围综述:n=4,33%;快速综述:n=1,8%;叙述性综述:n=1,8%)。大多数(57/67,85%)干预措施针对乳腺癌和宫颈癌的认知和筛查接受度。用于提高癌症筛查接受度的最常用的 mHealth 技术是短信和电话。总体而言,mHealth 干预措施提高了对筛查的认识,参与者的接受度很高。当干预措施结合使用多种沟通方式(电话提醒、物理邀请函和教育小册子)和 mHealth 时,提高与接受度相关的结果的可能性增加。
mHealth 干预措施提高了癌症筛查的接受度,尽管多种模式联合使用似乎更有效。