School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Division of Communication and Media Research, LMU Munich, Oettingenstr. 67, 80538, Munich, Germany.
J Relig Health. 2023 Jun;62(3):1695-1715. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01632-3. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
As there are many and sometimes ambivalent intersections of health and religion, strategic collaborations with religious opinion leaders in health campaigns have been increasingly explored. Despite the known influence of distinct contextual factors within emergency and non-emergency settings, existing research seldom distinguishes between those different factors and their impact on the inclusion of religious leaders as health messengers. To compare the contextual factors of religious leaders as health messengers during emergency and non-emergency situations in a setting with high religious affiliations, this study used a qualitative approach and triangulated the perspectives of three different samples, including (religious) opinion leaders, members of religious communities, and developers of health communication strategies in Sierra Leone. The results provide multifaceted insights into contextual factors applicable to emergency and non-emergency settings as well as the risks and opportunities. Recommendations for the incorporation of religious leaders in health promotion activities in consideration of different contextual factors are provided.
由于健康和宗教之间存在许多相互交织的关系,有时甚至相互矛盾,因此人们越来越多地探索在健康运动中与宗教意见领袖建立战略合作伙伴关系。尽管在紧急和非紧急情况下存在不同的、有时相互矛盾的影响因素,但现有研究很少区分这些不同的因素及其对将宗教领袖纳入健康信息传播者的影响。为了比较在一个宗教信仰程度较高的环境中,宗教领袖在紧急和非紧急情况下作为健康信息传播者的背景因素,本研究采用了定性方法,并从三个不同的样本(宗教)意见领袖、宗教社区成员和塞拉利昂健康传播策略制定者的角度进行了三角测量。研究结果提供了多方面的见解,涉及适用于紧急和非紧急情况的背景因素以及风险和机遇。研究还就考虑到不同的背景因素,将宗教领袖纳入健康促进活动提出了建议。