Li Shaoyuan, Zhang Zixuan, Jiao Yue, Jin Guixing, Wu Yue, Xu Fengquan, Zhao Yufeng, Jia Hongxiao, Qin Zongshi, Zhang Zhangjin, Rong Peijing
Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Psychiatry Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 4;13:902450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.902450. eCollection 2022.
Depression accompanying chronic pain (CP) is one of the most common comorbid psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) combined with electroacupuncture at Baihui (GV20) and Yintang (GV29) acupoints compared with citalopram.
Sixty patients with depression and pain comorbidity were enrolled in a prospective 8-week, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either taVNS combined with electroacupuncture treatment (taVNS: 8 weeks, 3 sessions per week; electroacupuncture: 8 weeks, twice per day, no drugs) or citalopram treatment (8 weeks, 40 mg/day). The primary outcome was Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary endpoints were evaluated using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), self-reported 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA).
Both the taVNS combined with electroacupuncture and citalopram groups had significant reductions in depressive and pain symptoms, as indicated by the decrease in MARDS and SF-MPQ scores. Regarding the analgesic effect, the pain intensity score of the SF-MPQ showed a larger reduction with citalopram than with taVNS combined with electroacupuncture at 6 weeks ( = 0.036). The reduction in the BP score of the SF-36 was higher at week 4 ( = 0.000), with no significant difference observed at week 8 ( = 0.1110). This result indicated that the pain intensity can be improved rapidly with citalopram compared with taVNS combined with electroacupuncture. Similarly, the comparison of PSQI scores at 4, 6, and 8 weeks indicates that there was no significant difference between groups, except in the use of sleeping medications. At week 6, higher medication use was found in the citalopram group than in the taVNS combined with electroacupuncture group ( = 0.049).
In summary, compared with citalopram, taVNS combined with electroacupuncture produces similar positive effects on depressive and pain symptoms in patients with depression and chronic pain, which last for at least 8 weeks.
慢性疼痛(CP)伴发的抑郁症是最常见的共病精神障碍之一。本研究旨在探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)联合百会(GV20)和印堂(GV29)穴位电针与西酞普兰相比的疗效。
60例抑郁症合并疼痛患者纳入一项为期8周的前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配接受taVNS联合电针治疗(taVNS:8周,每周3次;电针:8周,每天2次,不使用药物)或西酞普兰治疗(8周,40毫克/天)。主要结局指标是蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)。次要终点指标采用麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)、自我报告的36项简短调查(SF-36)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)进行评估。
taVNS联合电针组和西酞普兰组的抑郁和疼痛症状均有显著减轻,MADRS和SF-MPQ评分降低表明了这一点。关于镇痛效果,在第6周时,西酞普兰组SF-MPQ的疼痛强度评分降低幅度大于taVNS联合电针组(P = 0.036)。SF-36的BP评分在第4周时降低幅度更大(P = 0.000),在第8周时未观察到显著差异(P = 0.1110)。这一结果表明,与taVNS联合电针相比,西酞普兰能更快地改善疼痛强度。同样,在第4、6和8周对PSQI评分的比较表明,除了使用睡眠药物外,两组之间没有显著差异。在第6周时,西酞普兰组的药物使用量高于taVNS联合电针组(P = 0.049)。
总之,与西酞普兰相比,taVNS联合电针在抑郁症合并慢性疼痛患者的抑郁和疼痛症状方面产生相似的积极效果,且至少持续8周。