Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 20;19(16):10378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610378.
Background: The effectiveness of the virtual reality (VR) for the upper extremity (UE) motor rehabilitation after stroke has been widely studied. However, the effectiveness of the combination between rehabilitation gloves and semi-immersive VR (SVR) compared to conventional treatment has not yet been studied. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDRo, and Scopus, Cochrane, CINHAAL databases from inception to May 2022. Randomized controlled trials were included if patients were under rehabilitation with haptic gloves combined with SVR intervention focused on the UE rehabilitation in stroke patients. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and the modified Cochrane library criteria. A random effects model was used for the quantitative assessment of the included studies using the standard mean difference with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and the incoherence index (I2). Results: After a first screening, seven studies were included. Significant differences with a 95% confidence interval were obtained in favor of the rehabilitation glove combined with SVR in the short term (SMD—standardized mean differences = 0.38, 95% CI—confidence interval = 0.20; 0.56; Z: 4.24; p =< 0.001). In the long term, only the studies that performed an intervention based in rehabilitation glove combined with SVR with also included rehabilitation were able to maintain the improvements (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.40; 1.02; Z: 4.48; p =< 0.001). Conclusions: The combined use of rehabilitation haptic gloves and SVR with conventional rehabilitation produces significant improvements with respect to conventional rehabilitation treatment alone in terms of functionality of the UE in stroke patients.
虚拟现实(VR)在中风后上肢(UE)运动康复中的有效性已得到广泛研究。然而,与传统治疗相比,康复手套与半沉浸式 VR(SVR)相结合的效果尚未得到研究。
系统检索了 Pubmed、Web of Science、PEDRo 和 Scopus、Cochrane、CINHAAL 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 5 月。如果患者接受康复手套与侧重于中风患者 UE 康复的 SVR 干预相结合的康复治疗,则纳入随机对照试验。使用 Physiotherapy Evidence Database(PEDro)和改良 Cochrane 图书馆标准评估偏倚风险和方法学质量。使用标准均数差(95%置信区间),对纳入研究进行随机效应模型的定量评估。使用 Cochran's Q 检验和不协调性指数(I2)评估纳入研究的异质性。
经过初次筛选,纳入了 7 项研究。短期治疗中,康复手套与 SVR 相结合的治疗组具有显著差异(SMD-标准化均数差=0.38,95%置信区间=0.20;0.56;Z:4.24;p<0.001)。在长期治疗中,只有将康复手套与 SVR 相结合的干预治疗与常规康复治疗同时进行的研究才能够保持改善(SMD=0.71,95%置信区间=0.40;1.02;Z:4.48;p<0.001)。
与单独进行常规康复治疗相比,康复手套与 SVR 联合常规康复治疗可显著改善中风患者 UE 的功能。