• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

财务状况:用优化后的指标来衡量难以捉摸的概念。

Financial well-being: Capturing an elusive construct with an optimized measure.

作者信息

Aubrey Marc, Morin Alexandre J S, Fernet Claude, Carbonneau Noémie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:935284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935284. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935284
PMID:36033044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9412911/
Abstract

Several definitions and measures of financial well-being (FWB) have been proposed in the scientific literature. The Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-being Scale (MSFWBS) stands out among these measures in its ability to account for the conceptual richness of FWB. However, the original validation study based on a confirmatory factor analytic model indicated that the factor structure of scores obtained on this instrument was acceptable at best, revealing factor correlations high enough to question the discriminant validity of the factors. To improve conceptual and operational clarity of FWB, this study assesses the psychometric properties of the MSFWBS among French-Canadian adults ( = 454), using statistical models better suited to the examination of multidimensional constructs (exploratory structural equation modeling-ESEM, and bifactor-ESEM). Our results supported a bifactor-ESEM representation of scores on the MSFWBS, and their measurement invariance across groups of participants defined on the basis of their age, sex, personal income and household income. Our results also supported the convergent (with other measures of FWB) and criterion-related (with measures of life satisfaction, perceived stress, and psychological distress) validity of scores obtained on the MSFWBS (particularly the global FWB factor). By providing an optimized measure of FWB, our study contributes to advancing research on FWB.

摘要

科学文献中已经提出了几种财务幸福感(FWB)的定义和衡量方法。多维主观财务幸福感量表(MSFWBS)在这些衡量方法中脱颖而出,因为它能够体现财务幸福感概念的丰富性。然而,基于验证性因素分析模型的原始验证研究表明,使用该工具获得的分数的因素结构充其量只能说是可以接受的,所揭示的因素相关性高到足以质疑这些因素的区分效度。为了提高财务幸福感在概念和操作上的清晰度,本研究使用更适合检验多维结构的统计模型(探索性结构方程建模-ESEM和双因素-ESEM),评估了法裔加拿大成年人(n = 454)中MSFWBS的心理测量特性。我们的结果支持了MSFWBS分数的双因素-ESEM表示,以及它们在根据年龄、性别、个人收入和家庭收入定义的参与者群体中的测量不变性。我们的结果还支持了MSFWBS(特别是总体FWB因素)获得的分数的收敛效度(与其他FWB测量方法)和与标准相关的效度(与生活满意度、感知压力和心理困扰的测量方法)。通过提供一种优化的FWB测量方法,我们的研究有助于推进对FWB的研究。

相似文献

1
Financial well-being: Capturing an elusive construct with an optimized measure.财务状况:用优化后的指标来衡量难以捉摸的概念。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:935284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935284. eCollection 2022.
2
A Bifactor-ESEM Representation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.感知社会支持多维量表的双因素-扩展结构方程模型表示
Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 20:332941231206992. doi: 10.1177/00332941231206992.
3
Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.使用双因素探索性结构方程建模框架研究早期算术能力的维度
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:680124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680124. eCollection 2021.
4
Construct Validity of the Social Provisions Scale: A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.社会支持量表的结构效度:一种双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):720-733. doi: 10.1177/1073191115589344. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
5
Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale: a Bifactor-ESEM approach in a youth sample (15-24 years).疫苗接种态度量表(VAX):青少年样本(15-24 岁)中的双因素- ESEM 方法。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 23;11(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01388-9.
6
Investigating the Multidimensionality and Psychometric Properties of the Children's Anger Rumination Scale (CARS): A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.探究儿童愤怒反刍量表(CARS)的多维性和心理计量学特性:双因素探索性结构方程建模框架。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):533-550. doi: 10.1177/10731911211043569. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
7
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale in three South African samples: A bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling approach.南非三个样本中基本心理需求量表的因子结构与测量不变性:双因子探索性结构方程建模方法
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2760-2787. doi: 10.1177/00332941211025275. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
8
Construct Validation of Self-Determination Theory in Second Language Scale: The Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.第二语言量表中自我决定理论的结构效度:双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:732016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732016. eCollection 2021.
9
The Multidimensional and Hierarchical Nature of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Wellbeing: A Bifactor-ESEM Representation in a Spanish Sample.幸福感问卷的多维性和层次性:西班牙样本中的双因素-扩展结构方程模型表示
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 11;11:422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00422. eCollection 2020.
10
Re-Applying the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale to Various Portuguese Exercise Groups: An Analysis of Bifactor Models and Contextual Invariance.重新应用基本心理需求在运动量表中至各种葡萄牙运动群体:双因素模型和情境不变性分析。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Aug;128(4):1660-1683. doi: 10.1177/00315125211016803. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants of a Healthy Shipping Company: A Pilot Study of Seafarers' and Management Perspectives.健康航运公司的关键决定因素:海员与管理层观点的初步研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251356134. doi: 10.1177/00469580251356134. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
2
The impact of financial toxicity on quality of life for survivors of primary brain tumour.经济毒性对原发性脑肿瘤幸存者生活质量的影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01814-4.
3
A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.一项关于幸福感衡量标准的范围综述:全面幸福感的概念化和量表。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 23;12(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.

本文引用的文献

1
How Accurate Is Your Correlation? Different Methods Derive Different Results and Different Interpretations.你的相关性有多准确?不同方法得出不同结果和不同解释。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 24;13:901412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901412. eCollection 2022.
2
The contribution of financial well-being, social support, and trait emotional intelligence on psychological distress.财务幸福感、社会支持和特质情绪智力对心理困扰的贡献。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;59(2):224-240. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12242. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
3
Stress, cortisol, and social hierarchy.压力、皮质醇与社会等级。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
4
Financial Literacy and Economic Outcomes: Evidence and Policy Implications.金融素养与经济成果:证据与政策启示
J Retire. 2015 Summer;3(1):107-114. doi: 10.3905/jor.2015.3.1.107.
5
Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers' sexism.职场中的性别不平等:组织结构、流程、实践以及决策者性别歧视的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400. eCollection 2015.
6
Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.不同类型的幸福感?享乐主义和自我实现幸福感的跨文化考察。
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):471-82. doi: 10.1037/pas0000209. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
8
High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.高收入提高对生活的评价,但不能提高情绪幸福感。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
9
Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.罗森伯格自尊量表竞争因素结构的纵向测试:特质、短暂人工制品和稳定的反应风格。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):366-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019225.
10
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.