• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨质疏松症、骨折与生存率:机器学习在乳腺癌预测模型中的应用

Osteoporosis, fracture and survival: Application of machine learning in breast cancer prediction models.

作者信息

Ji Lichen, Zhang Wei, Zhong Xugang, Zhao Tingxiao, Sun Xixi, Zhu Senbo, Tong Yu, Luo Junchao, Xu Youjia, Yang Di, Kang Yao, Wang Jin, Bi Qing

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:973307. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973307. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.973307
PMID:36033513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9417646/
Abstract

The risk of osteoporosis in breast cancer patients is higher than that in healthy populations. The fracture and death rates increase after patients are diagnosed with osteoporosis. We aimed to develop machine learning-based models to predict the risk of osteoporosis as well as the relative fracture occurrence and prognosis. We selected 749 breast cancer patients from two independent Chinese centers and applied six different methods of machine learning to develop osteoporosis, fracture and survival risk assessment models. The performance of the models was compared with that of current models, such as FRAX, OSTA and TNM, by applying ROC, DCA curve analysis, and the calculation of accuracy and sensitivity in both internal and independent external cohorts. Three models were developed. The XGB model demonstrated the best discriminatory performance among the models. Internal and external validation revealed that the AUCs of the osteoporosis model were 0.86 and 0.87, compared with the FRAX model (0.84 and 0.72)/OSTA model (0.77 and 0.66), respectively. The fracture model had high AUCs in the internal and external cohorts of 0.93 and 0.92, which were higher than those of the FRAX model (0.89 and 0.86). The survival model was also assessed and showed high reliability internal and external validation (AUC of 0.96 and 0.95), which was better than that of the TNM model (AUCs of 0.87 and 0.87). Our models offer a solid approach to help improve decision making.

摘要

乳腺癌患者患骨质疏松症的风险高于健康人群。患者被诊断为骨质疏松症后,骨折和死亡率会增加。我们旨在开发基于机器学习的模型,以预测骨质疏松症的风险以及相对骨折发生率和预后。我们从两个独立的中国中心选取了749例乳腺癌患者,并应用六种不同的机器学习方法来开发骨质疏松症、骨折和生存风险评估模型。通过应用ROC、DCA曲线分析以及计算内部和独立外部队列中的准确性和敏感性,将这些模型的性能与当前模型(如FRAX、OSTA和TNM)进行比较。开发了三个模型。XGB模型在这些模型中表现出最佳的区分性能。内部和外部验证显示,骨质疏松症模型的AUC分别为0.86和0.87,而FRAX模型为(0.84和0.72)/OSTA模型为(0.77和0.66)。骨折模型在内部和外部队列中的AUC较高,分别为0.93和0.92,高于FRAX模型(0.89和0.86)。还对生存模型进行了评估,结果显示其在内部和外部验证中具有较高的可靠性(AUC为0.96和0.95),优于TNM模型(AUC为0.87和0.87)。我们的模型提供了一种可靠的方法来帮助改善决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/626d10f90c1f/fonc-12-973307-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/7cf760189dee/fonc-12-973307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/43e72737bcde/fonc-12-973307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/7ec10da55008/fonc-12-973307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/5f5f7d946834/fonc-12-973307-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/626d10f90c1f/fonc-12-973307-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/7cf760189dee/fonc-12-973307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/43e72737bcde/fonc-12-973307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/7ec10da55008/fonc-12-973307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/5f5f7d946834/fonc-12-973307-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/366f/9417646/626d10f90c1f/fonc-12-973307-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Osteoporosis, fracture and survival: Application of machine learning in breast cancer prediction models.骨质疏松症、骨折与生存率:机器学习在乳腺癌预测模型中的应用
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:973307. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973307. eCollection 2022.
2
Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Elderly Male (BFH-OSTM) vs Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: a cross-sectional study.北京友谊医院老年男性骨质疏松自我评估工具(BFH-OSTM)与骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)在识别中国老年男性新发疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折中的比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 28;22(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04476-2.
3
Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of lung metastases from rectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study.应用机器学习技术预测直肠癌肺转移风险:一项真实世界回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 24;13:1183072. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183072. eCollection 2023.
4
Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.三种用于识别中国老年男性疼痛性新发骨质疏松性椎体骨折工具的验证:骨密度、亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具和骨折风险评估工具。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 22;11:461-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101078. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparison of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians and the fracture risk assessment tool - FRAX to identify densitometric defined osteoporosis: A discriminatory value analysis in a multi-ethnic female population in Southeast Asia.亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具与骨折风险评估工具FRAX用于识别骨密度测定定义的骨质疏松症的比较:东南亚多民族女性人群的鉴别价值分析
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020 Jun;6(2):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
6
Comparisons of Different Screening Tools for Identifying Fracture/Osteoporosis Risk Among Community-Dwelling Older People.不同筛查工具用于识别社区居住老年人骨折/骨质疏松症风险的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(20):e3415. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003415.
7
Bone metastasis risk and prognosis assessment models for kidney cancer based on machine learning.基于机器学习的肾癌骨转移风险和预后评估模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1015952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1015952. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Fracture Risk in Patients with Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.老年发病类风湿关节炎患者骨折风险预测机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Oct 14;15:7817-7829. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S380197. eCollection 2022.
9
Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.预测工具识别非创伤性骨折风险个体的性能:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):721-740. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04919-6. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Comparison of three tools for predicting primary osteoporosis in an elderly male population in Beijing: a cross-sectional study.三种工具在北京老年男性人群中预测原发性骨质疏松症的比较:一项横断面研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Feb 2;13:201-209. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S145741. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning models to predict osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3-5 and end-stage kidney disease.用于预测慢性肾脏病3-5期及终末期肾病患者骨质疏松症的机器学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95928-5.
2
Externally validated and clinically useful machine learning algorithms to support patient-related decision-making in oncology: a scoping review.用于支持肿瘤学中患者相关决策的经过外部验证且具有临床实用性的机器学习算法:一项范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02463-y.
3
Artificial intelligence in breast cancer survival prediction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of scaling up access to treatment and imaging modalities on global disparities in breast cancer survival: a simulation-based analysis.扩大治疗和影像学手段的可及性对全球乳腺癌生存差异的影响:基于模拟的分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1301-1311. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00403-4. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for pre-miRNA classification.用于 miRNA 前体分类的混合 CNN-LSTM 模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 8;11(1):14125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93656-0.
3
Correlation of Osteoporosis in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study in Chinese Population.
人工智能在乳腺癌生存预测中的应用:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1420328. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1420328. eCollection 2024.
4
Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.亚洲人群骨折风险评估工具的鉴别准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Bone Metab. 2024 Nov;31(4):296-315. doi: 10.11005/jbm.24.781. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
5
Results of the Italian cross-sectional web-based survey "Nutrition and breast cancer, what would you like to know?" An attempt to collect and respond to patients' information needs, through social media.意大利基于网络的横断面调查“营养与乳腺癌,你想了解什么?”的结果。通过社交媒体收集并回应患者信息需求的一次尝试。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 25;14:1436610. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1436610. eCollection 2024.
6
Applications of Artificial Intelligence Methods for the Prediction of Osteoporotic Fractures.人工智能方法在骨质疏松性骨折预测中的应用。
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;13(8):1738. doi: 10.3390/life13081738.
中文译文:中国人群中初诊 2 型糖尿病患者骨质疏松的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 14;12:531904. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.531904. eCollection 2021.
4
Breast cancer.乳腺癌。
Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
Evidence on physical activity and osteoporosis prevention for people aged 65+ years: a systematic review to inform the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.关于 65 岁以上人群的身体活动和骨质疏松症预防的证据:为世界卫生组织关于身体活动和久坐行为指南提供信息的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01040-4.
6
Comparison of OSTA, FRAX and BMI for Predicting Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in a Han Population in Beijing: A Cross Sectional Study.OSTA、FRAX 和 BMI 预测北京汉族绝经后骨质疏松症的比较:一项横断面研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 17;15:1171-1180. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S257166. eCollection 2020.
7
Bone Mineral Density and FRAX Score May Not Predict Fracture Risk in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Hormone Deprivation Therapies.骨密度和FRAX评分可能无法预测接受激素剥夺治疗的癌症患者的骨折风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3363-3366. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00434. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention.有效预防乳腺癌的关键步骤。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(8):417-436. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE.美国临床内分泌医师协会/美国内分泌学会 2020 年绝经后骨质疏松症诊断和治疗临床实践指南更新版
Endocr Pract. 2020 May;26(Suppl 1):1-46. doi: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL.
10
Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment.糖皮质激素性骨质疏松症的发病机制与治疗选择。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020 Aug;16(8):437-447. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0341-0. Epub 2020 Apr 14.