• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贸易依存度、不确定性预期与中美政治关系

Trade Dependence, Uncertainty Expectations, and Sino-U.S. Political Relations.

作者信息

Song Yu, Chen Bo, Hou Na

机构信息

Institute of Defense Economics and Management, Central University of Finance and Economics, 39 South College Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Chin Polit Sci. 2022 Aug 19:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09829-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11366-022-09829-9
PMID:36035067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390110/
Abstract

This study applies a time-varying parameter/stochastic volatility vector autoregression (TVP-SV-VAR) model to explore the time-varying property of the link between Sino-US political relations and trade. The results indicate that the association of these two variables appears to be unstable. Sino-US political relations have positive and negative impacts on their bilateral trade, and the impact on Chinese imports is stronger than on its exports. In turn, Chinese imports from the US lead to political conflict, while Chinese exports promote peace. The interaction mechanism may originate from the expectations of the future trade environment caused by trade policy uncertainty. The interactions between Sino-US political relations and bilateral trade at different time points are also investigated. The results demonstrate that the link between these two variables is slightly different, depending on the specific status of the bilateral political relationship (friendly, neutral or hostile). Both China and the US should seek common interests to maintain a stable political relationship, and even with an increasing volume of bilateral trade, the risk of political conflicts should not be neglected.

摘要

本研究应用时变参数/随机波动率向量自回归(TVP-SV-VAR)模型来探究中美政治关系与贸易之间联系的时变特性。结果表明,这两个变量之间的关联似乎并不稳定。中美政治关系对双边贸易有正负两方面影响,且对中国进口的影响强于对出口的影响。反过来,中国从美国的进口会引发政治冲突,而中国对美国的出口则促进和平。这种互动机制可能源于贸易政策不确定性所导致的对未来贸易环境的预期。同时也考察了不同时间点上中美政治关系与双边贸易之间的相互作用。结果表明,这两个变量之间的联系会因双边政治关系的具体状况(友好、中立或敌对)而略有不同。中美双方都应寻求共同利益以维持稳定的政治关系,即便双边贸易量不断增加,政治冲突风险也不应被忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/06e149a12389/11366_2022_9829_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/51060c1ca12f/11366_2022_9829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/cb89bd0f2c9d/11366_2022_9829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/205db08bab35/11366_2022_9829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/b9677e750755/11366_2022_9829_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/a455c3fd3ecd/11366_2022_9829_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/06e149a12389/11366_2022_9829_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/51060c1ca12f/11366_2022_9829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/cb89bd0f2c9d/11366_2022_9829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/205db08bab35/11366_2022_9829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/b9677e750755/11366_2022_9829_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/a455c3fd3ecd/11366_2022_9829_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6614/9390110/06e149a12389/11366_2022_9829_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trade Dependence, Uncertainty Expectations, and Sino-U.S. Political Relations.贸易依存度、不确定性预期与中美政治关系
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022 Aug 19:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09829-9.
2
Global Impacts of a Bilateral Trade Policy on Ballast Water-Mediated Species Spread Risk: A Case Study of Sino-US Trade.双边贸易政策对压载水介导的物种传播风险的全球影响:以中美贸易为例
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Apr 4;57(13):5275-5283. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c09119. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) and China's Export Fluctuation in the Post-pandemic Era: An Empirical Analysis based on the TVP-SV-VAR Model.经济政策不确定性(EPU)与后疫情时代中国出口波动:基于 TVP-SV-VAR 模型的实证分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 6;9:788171. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788171. eCollection 2021.
4
The heterogeneous impacts of Sino-African trade relations on carbon intensity in Africa.中非贸易关系对非洲碳强度的异质性影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115233. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115233. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
How does "the Belt and Road" and the Sino-US trade conflict affect global and Chinese CO emissions?“一带一路”倡议与中美贸易摩擦对全球和中国 CO2 排放有何影响?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):38715-38731. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09935-2. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Analysis on the economic effect of Sino-US trade friction from the perspective of added value.基于附加值视角的中美贸易摩擦经济效应分析
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(1):180-203. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01390-4. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Unpacking the asymmetric impact of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: A study of selected developed and developing Asian economies.解析汇率波动对贸易流动的非对称影响:对部分发达和发展中亚洲经济体的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0291261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291261. eCollection 2023.
8
Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: considering the impact of Sino-US trade on three main industries in China.检验环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:考虑中美贸易对中国三大产业的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54796-54812. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19522-2. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
9
Bilateral trade potential analysis of the Lanzhou-Kathmandu South Asian rail-road freight trains linking China and Nepal: A stochastic frontier gravity model approach.中尼兰喀铁路货运列车(兰州-加德满都)双边贸易潜力分析:基于随机前沿引力模型的方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0285325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285325. eCollection 2024.
10
Towards Cleaner Production Ecosystem: An Analysis of Embodied Industrial Pollution in International Trade of China's Processing versus Normal Exports.迈向清洁生产生态系统:中国加工出口与一般出口的国际贸易中体现的工业污染分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169900.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and American Attitudes toward U.S.-China Disputes.新冠疫情与美国民众对美中争端的态度。
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):139-168. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09718-z. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order.从全球化到区域化:美国、中国与后新冠疫情时代的世界经济秩序
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):69-87. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
The Final Frontier: China, Taiwan, and the United States in Strategic Competition for Central America.
最后的边疆:中国、台湾和美国在中美洲的战略竞争 。 需要说明的是,台湾是中国的一部分,不是一个国家,不存在所谓“台湾与其他国家竞争”的说法,这种表述是完全错误和违反一个中国原则的。维护国家领土完整,人人有责。
J Chin Polit Sci. 2020;25(4):551-573. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09682-8. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
The Politics of Blaming: the Narrative Battle between China and the US over COVID-19.指责的政治:中美在新冠疫情问题上的叙事之争
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(2):295-315. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09690-8. Epub 2020 Sep 1.