• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种临床护理教学方法的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。

Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China.

School of Nursing, Yueyang Vocational Technical College, Yueyang, Hunan Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0273693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273693. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273693
PMID:36040919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426898/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients' satisfaction.

METHODS

We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY2021120040.

摘要

简介

为了提高临床护理教学的质量和效率,已经采用了几种教学方法,但对其效果仍存在分歧。本研究将评估五种临床护理教学方法对护理学生知识、技能得分、学习满意度和患者满意度的影响。

方法

我们将在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库和中国科技期刊数据库(CSTJ)上进行检索,检索时间截至 2022 年 4 月。将纳入符合纳入标准的随机对照试验。两名作者将独立筛选研究选择和数据提取的资格。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估证据质量。将使用 RevMan、Stata 和 R 软件进行配对荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。将完成同质性检验、敏感性分析、传递性检验、一致性检验和发表偏倚等统计分析。

伦理与传播

不需要正式的研究伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上。

协议注册号

INPLASY2021120040。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d755/9426898/91ad7733bcd2/pone.0273693.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d755/9426898/91ad7733bcd2/pone.0273693.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d755/9426898/91ad7733bcd2/pone.0273693.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.五种临床护理教学方法的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0273693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273693. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of six teaching strategies on medical students: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.六种教学策略对医学生影响的系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e079716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079716.
3
Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating severe pneumonia: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中药注射剂治疗重症肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价和贝叶斯网状Meta 分析的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 23;17(5):e0262776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262776. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparative efficacy of different acupuncture therapies on cancer-related insomnia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同针灸疗法治疗癌症相关失眠的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e064181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064181.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Antidiabetic and antiosteoporotic pharmacotherapies for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes-induced bone disease: protocol for two network meta-analyses.防治 2 型糖尿病性骨病的抗糖尿病和抗骨质疏松药物治疗:两项网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e034741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034741.
7
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in complementary and alternative medicine for insomnia in breast cancer survivors: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非药物干预在乳腺癌幸存者失眠中的补充和替代医学:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 4;13(5):e071784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071784.
8
Effects of traditional Chinese medicine exercise therapy on cancer-related fatigue, anxiety and sleep quality in cancer patients: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.中药运动疗法对癌症患者癌因性疲乏、焦虑及睡眠质量影响的系统评价及网络Meta 分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27681. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027681.
9
Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: a study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非药物干预对帕金森病患者抑郁症状的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 2;13(5):e068019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068019.
10
Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.经颅磁刺激对围手术期神经认知功能障碍的影响:一项关于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e102865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102865.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of scenario-based simulation training on nursing students' knowledge and performance in patient care after coronary artery surgery.基于情景模拟训练对冠状动脉搭桥术后护理学生在患者护理方面的知识及表现的影响。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 13;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03148-z.
2
Effect of early clinical exposure on communication, history-taking, and nursing diagnosis skills: A brief report.早期临床接触对沟通、病史采集及护理诊断技能的影响:简要报告
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Feb 28;14:77. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_208_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Which novel teaching strategy is most recommended in medical education? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing and Midwifery Students' Satisfaction with Their Clinical Rotation Experience: The Role of the Clinical Learning Environment.护理与助产专业学生对其实习轮转经历的满意度:临床学习环境的作用
Nurs Res Pract. 2021 Apr 14;2021:7258485. doi: 10.1155/2021/7258485. eCollection 2021.
2
COVID-19 Pandemic: The Challenges to the Professional Identity of Nurses and Nursing Education.新冠疫情:对护士职业身份及护理教育的挑战
J Nurs Res. 2021 Apr 1;29(2):e138. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000431.
3
Network meta-analysis: what it is and why you should know.
哪种新的教学策略在医学教育中最值得推荐?系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1342. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06291-4.
4
Development and Implementation of a Mobile-Integrated Simulation for COVID-19 Nursing Practice: A Randomized Controlled Pretest-Posttest Experimental Design.用于COVID-19护理实践的移动集成模拟的开发与实施:随机对照前测-后测实验设计
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;12(4):419. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040419.
网状Meta分析:是什么以及你为何应该了解。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jun;90(6):954-956. doi: 10.1111/ans.15917.
4
Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19.疫情下的护理教育:应对新冠疫情的学术挑战
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
6
Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis.荟萃分析中四种异质性测量方法的比较。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):376-384. doi: 10.1111/jep.13159. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
Research Techniques Made Simple: Network Meta-Analysis.研究技巧解析:网络荟萃分析。
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Jan;139(1):4-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.028.
8
A comprehensive literature review of guidelines facilitating transition of newly graduated nurses to professional nurses.新毕业护士向职业护士过渡的指南的综合文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 May;30:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
The flip side of traditional nursing education: A literature review.传统护理教育的另一面:文献综述
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Mar;29:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Medical Education and Health Care Delivery: A Call to Better Align Goals and Purposes.医学教育与医疗保健服务提供:呼吁更好地调整目标和宗旨。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):384-390. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001921.