• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何确定生态补偿阈值?一种整合最小数据方法和最合适土地利用情景的判别模型。

How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios.

作者信息

Zhang Yuxiang, Guan Dongjie, Wu Lei, Su Xiangyuan, Zhou Lilei, Peng Guochuan

机构信息

School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No.66 Xuefu Rd., Nan'an Dist., Chongqing 400074, China.

School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No.66 Xuefu Rd., Nan'an Dist., Chongqing 400074, China; State Key Laboratory of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No.66 Xuefu Rd., Nan'an Dist., Chongqing 400074, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 15;852:158377. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158377. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158377
PMID:36049678
Abstract

Ecological compensation has become very common worldwide due to the imbalance in the development of modern society, economy, and the environment and the increased pressure on ecosystem carrying capacity. Nonetheless, the various approaches for quantifying ecological compensation standards differ significantly. Thus, the process for determining a reasonable ecological compensation threshold is important to understand. To ensure the maximization of ecosystem service supply and economic benefit incentives for farmers, this paper constructs a discriminant model of an ecological compensation threshold based on the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenario to define the ecological compensation threshold of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in the upper Yangtze River basin. The results show that with an increase in the compensation price, the proportion of farmers participating in returning farmland to forests and grassland increases, and water conservation increases. However, the discriminant curve first increases to a certain threshold point and then decreases, after which the ecoefficiency rate obtained from the compensation decreases. The ecological compensation thresholds for Chongqing, Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Hubei, Qinghai, Gansu, Tibet and Shaanxi provinces are 17.74 yuan/m, 13.79 yuan/m, 19.1 yuan/m, 17.79 yuan/m, 15.28 yuan/m, 45.14 yuan/m, 17.23 yuan/m, 25.2 yuan/m and 22.36 yuan/m, respectively. This research examines ecological compensation standards in different watersheds throughout the world and discusses the relationship between ecological compensation and water conservation. The discriminant model of the ecological compensation threshold can provide a new reference for the implementation and management of ecological compensation policies.

摘要

由于现代社会、经济与环境发展的不平衡以及生态系统承载能力压力的增加,生态补偿在全球范围内已变得十分普遍。尽管如此,量化生态补偿标准的各种方法存在显著差异。因此,理解确定合理生态补偿阈值的过程很重要。为确保生态系统服务供给最大化以及对农民的经济利益激励,本文基于最小数据方法和最合适的土地利用情景构建了生态补偿阈值判别模型,以界定长江上游流域退耕还林还草工程的生态补偿阈值。结果表明,随着补偿价格的提高,参与退耕还林还草的农民比例增加,水源涵养量也增加。然而,判别曲线先上升至某一阈值点后下降,此后从补偿中获得的生态效率降低。重庆、四川、云南、贵州、湖北、青海、甘肃、西藏和陕西等省份的生态补偿阈值分别为17.74元/米、13.79元/米、19.1元/米、17.79元/米、15.28元/米、45.14元/米、17.23元/米、25.2元/米和22.36元/米。本研究考察了全球不同流域的生态补偿标准,并探讨了生态补偿与水源涵养之间的关系。生态补偿阈值判别模型可为生态补偿政策的实施与管理提供新的参考。

相似文献

1
How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios.如何确定生态补偿阈值?一种整合最小数据方法和最合适土地利用情景的判别模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 15;852:158377. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158377. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Inter-regional ecological compensation in the Yellow River Basin based on the value of ecosystem services.基于生态系统服务价值的黄河流域跨区域生态补偿
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116073. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116073. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Impacts of the returning farmland to forest (grassland)project on ecosystem services in the Weihe River Basin, China.退耕还林还草工程对渭河流域生态系统服务的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3893-3904. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.005.
4
An ecological compensation standard based on emergy theory for the Xiao Honghe River Basin.基于能值理论的小洪河流域生态补偿标准
Water Sci Technol. 2015;71(10):1463-70. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.121.
5
Regional ecological compensation accounting in Fuzhou City based on a payment for ecosystem services (PES)model.基于生态系统服务付费(PES)模型的福州市区域生态补偿核算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3805-3814. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009.
6
[Principles and implementation of the integrated management of "mountain-river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland" in Horqin Sand Land, China].[中国科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙”一体化治理的原则与实施]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Dec;33(12):3441-3447. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.026.
7
Evaluation and analysis of water conservation function of ecosystem in Shaanxi Province in China based on "Grain for Green" Projects.基于“退耕还林”工程的中国陕西省生态系统水源涵养功能评价与分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):83878-83896. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21730-9. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Multi-Scenario Simulation and Trade-Off Analysis of Ecological Service Value in the Manas River Basin Based on Land Use Optimization in China.基于中国土地利用优化的玛纳斯河流域生态服务价值多情景模拟与权衡分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106216.
9
Evaluation of the value of water retention service in the middle and upper reaches of Hunhe River based on SWAT Model.基于 SWAT 模型评估浑河中上游的水资源涵养服务价值。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3905-3912. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.007.
10
Spatial-temporal evolution and responses of ecosystem service value under land use change in the Yellow River Basin:A case study of Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia region, Northwest China.黄河流域土地利用变化下生态系统服务价值的时空演变及响应——以中国西北陕甘宁地区为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3913-3922. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Kuznets curve relationship between economic development and ecological environment in Aba Prefecture.阿坝州经济发展与生态环境的库兹涅茨曲线关系分析
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 17;20(3):e0319929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319929. eCollection 2025.
2
Quantification and sensitivity assessment of Chinese provincial ecological compensation in the perspective of carbon deficit redistribution.基于碳赤字再分配视角的中国省级生态补偿量化与敏感性评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 29;14(1):22547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73868-w.
3
Analysis of spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of soil erosion in the Jiangnan Hills red soil zone, China.
中国江南丘陵红壤区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及影响因素分析
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19998. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19998. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Understanding ecological civilization in China: From political context to science.理解中国的生态文明:从政治背景到科学。
Ambio. 2023 Dec;52(12):1895-1909. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01897-2. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Carbon sinks and carbon emissions balance of land use transition in Xinjiang, China: differences and compensation.中国新疆土地利用变化的碳汇和碳排放量平衡:差异与补偿。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 27;12(1):22456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27095-w.