• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区韧性工具包(CART)评估调查问卷的韩国适应性心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Korean adaptation of the communities advancing resilience toolkit (CART) assessment survey.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.

Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):591-602. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1325. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1325
PMID:36054684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9834512/
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to establish a cross-cultural adaptation of the Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART) assessment survey for Korean communities (K-CART) and evaluated its psychometric properties of K-CART.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design was used.

METHODS

A forward and backward translation of the CART was conducted. The psychometric properties of K-CART were evaluated with test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity and construct validity. A field study was conducted involving 315 older adults in Pohang city, South Korea from January to March, 2019. Two versions of K-CART were analysed, based on the four-factor and the expanded five-factor K-CART.

RESULTS

The test-retest reliability and internal consistency were acceptable (intraclass consistency coefficient = .90). The consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's α = 0.91). The content validity index (CVI) was found to be acceptable; wherein the item-CVI and scale-CVI were both 0.95. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the construct validity of the expanded K-CART with five factors reached a more acceptable model fit (χ /df = 2.27, CFI = 0.89, TLI = 0.86, RMESA = 0.05).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对社区韧性工具包(CART)评估调查进行跨文化适应,以适用于韩国社区(K-CART),并评估其心理测量学特性。

设计

采用横断面研究设计。

方法

对 CART 进行了正向和反向翻译。采用重测信度、内部一致性、内容效度和结构效度来评估 K-CART 的心理测量学特性。2019 年 1 月至 3 月,在韩国浦项市对 315 名老年人进行了一项现场研究。分析了基于四因素和扩展五因素 K-CART 的两种 K-CART 版本。

结果

重测信度和内部一致性可接受(组内一致性系数为.90)。一致性可靠性令人满意(克朗巴赫的 α = 0.91)。内容效度指数(CVI)可接受;其中,项目 CVI 和量表 CVI 均为 0.95。验证性因子分析证实,具有五个因素的扩展 K-CART 的结构效度达到了更可接受的模型拟合(χ/df = 2.27,CFI = 0.89,TLI = 0.86,RMSEA = 0.05)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/9834512/e3226613a697/NOP2-10-591-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/9834512/e3226613a697/NOP2-10-591-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/9834512/e3226613a697/NOP2-10-591-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Korean adaptation of the communities advancing resilience toolkit (CART) assessment survey.社区韧性工具包(CART)评估调查问卷的韩国适应性心理测量学特性。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):591-602. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1325. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Health Literacy on Social Determinants of Health Questionnaire (K-HL-SDHQ).健康素养社会决定因素问卷(K-HL-SDHQ)韩国版的心理计量特性。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0224557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224557. eCollection 2019.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Smoking Media Literacy Scale for Adolescents.青少年吸烟媒体素养量表韩国版的心理测量特性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;9:675662. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.675662. eCollection 2021.
4
Decisional Balance Inventory (DBI) Adolescent Form for Smoking: Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version.吸烟决策平衡量表青少年版(DBI):波斯语版本的心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4425-2.
5
Psychometric properties of the Breast Cancer Awareness Measurement among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study.中文版女性乳腺癌认知测量量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e035911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035911.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.
7
Psychometric testing of the Iranian version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perception questionnaire: a cross-cultural validation study.伊朗版团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷的心理测量学测试:一项跨文化验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 17;21(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06739-z.
8
[The Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of the Infertility Stigma Scale (K-ISS)].[韩国版不孕症耻辱感量表(K-ISS)的信效度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Dec;52(6):582-597. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22068.
9
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
10
Adaptation and validation of Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale in Chinese population.适应和验证中文版里士满强迫性购买量表。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):760-769. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.94. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic assessment of community resilience in China: empirical surveys from three provinces.中国社区韧性的动态评估:来自三个省份的实证调查。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 19;12:1378723. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378723. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life among older adults who experienced the Pohang earthquake in South Korea: A cross-sectional survey.韩国 Pohang 地震后老年人的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面调查。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01944-8.
2
Community Orientation Scale among Community Health Nurses in Fiji: Scale development and psychometric evaluation.斐济社区健康护士的社区导向量表:量表开发与心理测量学评估
Nurs Open. 2020 May 25;7(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1002/nop2.508. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Predictors of resilience among adolescent disaster survivors: A path analysis.
青少年灾难幸存者心理复原力的预测因素:一项路径分析
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Aug;76(8):2060-2071. doi: 10.1111/jan.14396. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Associations between changes in resilient coping and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.应对韧性变化与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关联。
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Jun;43(3):255-262. doi: 10.1002/nur.22014. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Forging, protecting, and repairing community resilience informed by the 2019-2020 Australian bushfires.借鉴2019 - 2020年澳大利亚丛林大火的经验,打造、保护和修复社区复原力。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1095-1097. doi: 10.1111/jan.14306. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
6
A longitudinal study on psychological reactions and resilience among young survivors of a burn disaster in Taiwan 2015-2018.2015-2018 年台湾烧伤灾难年轻幸存者心理反应和韧性的纵向研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):514-525. doi: 10.1111/jan.14248. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery.社区韧性与灾害恢复文献综述
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Sep;6(3):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00239-3.
8
Factors that influence the health of older widows and widowers-A systematic review of quantitative research.影响老年寡妇和鳏夫健康的因素——定量研究的系统综述
Nurs Open. 2019 Feb 26;6(2):591-611. doi: 10.1002/nop2.243. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Resilience of an Earthquake-Stricken Rural Community in Southwest China: Correlation with Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts.中国西南地区一个遭受地震的农村社区的韧性:与减轻灾害风险工作的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(3):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030407.
10
What Do We Mean by 'Community Resilience'? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature.我们所说的“社区恢复力”是什么意思?关于其在文献中的定义的系统文献综述。
PLoS Curr. 2017 Feb 1;9:ecurrents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2.