Suppr超能文献

土耳其版婴儿绞痛量表在绞痛诊断中的预测效度和截断值。

Predictive validity and cut-off point of the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale in the diagnosis of colic.

机构信息

Ege University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

Ege University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Mar-Apr;99(2):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive validity and cut-off point of the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale (ICS) in the diagnosis of colic.

METHODS

This methodological study was carried out in a pediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Turkey with infants aged 6-16 weeks (n = 133). The data were collected using the Mother-Infant Description Form, the ICS, and the Rome IV criteria form. The scale is a 6-point Likert-type scale consisting of 19 items in total. A low total mean score obtained from it indicates that the probability of colic increases, while a high mean score indicates that the probability of colic decreases. The Rome IV criteria were used as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean score obtained from the ICS was 59.4 ± 13.7. According to the Rome IV criteria, 26.3% of the infants had colic. The area under the ROC curve was 87.4% (95% CI = 0.815-0.934, SE = 0.30, p = 0.001), and the cut-off point for the best sensitivity value (88.6%) and the best specificity value (70.5%) of the ICS was determined to be 60.5. According to the cut-off point, the positive predictive value was 51%, and the negative predictive value was 94%.

CONCLUSION

The predictive validity of the Turkish version of the ICS was found to be at a good level with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity for a cut-off point of 60.5. Healthcare professionals working in the child field can use the ICS to exclude colic in infants.

摘要

目的

探究土耳其版婴儿绞痛量表(ICS)在绞痛诊断中的预测效度和截断值。

方法

本方法学研究在土耳其一所大学医院的儿科门诊进行,纳入年龄为 6-16 周的婴儿(n=133)。使用母婴描述表、ICS 和罗马 IV 标准表收集数据。ICS 是一种 6 点 Likert 量表,共有 19 个项目。总得分越低,提示绞痛的可能性越大;总得分越高,提示绞痛的可能性越小。罗马 IV 标准被用作金标准。

结果

ICS 平均得分为 59.4±13.7。根据罗马 IV 标准,26.3%的婴儿患有绞痛。ROC 曲线下面积为 87.4%(95%CI=0.815-0.934,SE=0.30,p=0.001),ICS 最佳灵敏度值(88.6%)和最佳特异性值(70.5%)的截断值为 60.5。根据截断值,ICS 的阳性预测值为 51%,阴性预测值为 94%。

结论

土耳其版 ICS 具有较高的灵敏度和可接受的特异性,截断值为 60.5 时,预测效度良好。从事儿童领域工作的医疗保健专业人员可以使用 ICS 排除婴儿绞痛。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Recent advances in understanding and managing infantile colic.婴幼儿腹绞痛理解与管理的最新进展
F1000Res. 2018 Sep 7;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14940.1. eCollection 2018.
7
The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers.婴幼儿功能性胃肠病的新罗马IV标准
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Tools assessment and diagnosis to infant colic: a systematic review.婴儿腹绞痛的工具评估与诊断:一项系统综述
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jul;43(4):481-488. doi: 10.1111/cch.12454. Epub 2017 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验