• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictive validity and cut-off point of the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale in the diagnosis of colic.土耳其版婴儿绞痛量表在绞痛诊断中的预测效度和截断值。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Mar-Apr;99(2):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
[Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Social Communication Scale.].[社交沟通量表土耳其语版本的信度和效度。]
Klinik Psikofarmakol Bulteni. 2012 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.5455/bcp.20111212091514.
3
Validation of the Turkish version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale among women within their first postpartum year.产后第一年女性中爱丁堡产后抑郁量表土耳其语版本的效度验证。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;39(6):483-6. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0770-4.
4
A validity and reliability study investigating the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale.一项关于婴儿腹绞痛量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):84-90; discussion 90. doi: 10.1097/01.SGA.0000267925.31803.30.
5
[Validation of the Turkish version of the mood disorder questionnaire for screening bipolar disorders].[用于筛查双相情感障碍的心境障碍问卷土耳其语版本的验证]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2007 Summer;18(2):147-54.
6
Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.土耳其语版重症监护患者压疮风险评估量表的预测效度和信度:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015 Apr;61(4):58-62.
7
Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.手术患者的压疮:Norton、Braden 和 Waterlow 风险评估量表的比较。
J Wound Care. 2022 Feb 2;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.2.170.
8
[Diagnostic value of the currently used criteria and brain natriuretic peptide for diagnosing congestive heart failure in children with congenital heart disease].[目前使用的标准及脑钠肽对先天性心脏病患儿充血性心力衰竭的诊断价值]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Oct;44(10):728-32.
9
[Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Wender Utah Rating Scale for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults].[成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍的温德犹他评定量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2005 Winter;16(4):252-9.
10
Internal validation of a scoring system to evaluate the probability of ureteral stones: The CHOKAI score.评估输尿管结石可能性的评分系统的内部验证:鸟海评分
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Infantile spasms: Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pediatricians in Turkey.婴儿痉挛症:土耳其儿科医生的知识、态度和实践。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Jan;126:108456. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108456. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol.制定以人工智能为中心的诊断性试验准确性研究报告规范:STARD-AI 协议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 28;11(6):e047709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047709.
3
The Effects of the Rome IV Criteria on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Practice.罗马IV标准对儿科胃肠病学实践的影响。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Mar 19;22(5):21. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00760-8.
4
Recent advances in understanding and managing infantile colic.婴幼儿腹绞痛理解与管理的最新进展
F1000Res. 2018 Sep 7;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14940.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Developing a core outcome set for infant colic for primary, secondary and tertiary care settings: a prospective study.为初级、二级和三级护理机构制定婴儿腹绞痛核心结局集:一项前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e015418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015418.
6
Development of comorbid crying, sleeping, feeding problems across infancy: Neurodevelopmental vulnerability and parenting.婴儿期共病性哭闹、睡眠和喂养问题的发展:神经发育易损性与养育方式
Early Hum Dev. 2017 Jun;109:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
7
The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers.婴幼儿功能性胃肠病的新罗马IV标准
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Fussing and Crying Durations and Prevalence of Colic in Infants.系统评价与荟萃分析:婴儿的烦躁哭闹时长及腹绞痛患病率
J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;185:55-61.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
Tools assessment and diagnosis to infant colic: a systematic review.婴儿腹绞痛的工具评估与诊断:一项系统综述
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jul;43(4):481-488. doi: 10.1111/cch.12454. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
10
Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Rome IV.功能性胃肠疾病:历史、病理生理学、临床特征与罗马IV标准
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 19. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032.

土耳其版婴儿绞痛量表在绞痛诊断中的预测效度和截断值。

Predictive validity and cut-off point of the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale in the diagnosis of colic.

机构信息

Ege University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

Ege University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Mar-Apr;99(2):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2022.07.005
PMID:36055367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10031318/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive validity and cut-off point of the Turkish version of the Infant Colic Scale (ICS) in the diagnosis of colic.

METHODS

This methodological study was carried out in a pediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Turkey with infants aged 6-16 weeks (n = 133). The data were collected using the Mother-Infant Description Form, the ICS, and the Rome IV criteria form. The scale is a 6-point Likert-type scale consisting of 19 items in total. A low total mean score obtained from it indicates that the probability of colic increases, while a high mean score indicates that the probability of colic decreases. The Rome IV criteria were used as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean score obtained from the ICS was 59.4 ± 13.7. According to the Rome IV criteria, 26.3% of the infants had colic. The area under the ROC curve was 87.4% (95% CI = 0.815-0.934, SE = 0.30, p = 0.001), and the cut-off point for the best sensitivity value (88.6%) and the best specificity value (70.5%) of the ICS was determined to be 60.5. According to the cut-off point, the positive predictive value was 51%, and the negative predictive value was 94%.

CONCLUSION

The predictive validity of the Turkish version of the ICS was found to be at a good level with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity for a cut-off point of 60.5. Healthcare professionals working in the child field can use the ICS to exclude colic in infants.

摘要

目的

探究土耳其版婴儿绞痛量表(ICS)在绞痛诊断中的预测效度和截断值。

方法

本方法学研究在土耳其一所大学医院的儿科门诊进行,纳入年龄为 6-16 周的婴儿(n=133)。使用母婴描述表、ICS 和罗马 IV 标准表收集数据。ICS 是一种 6 点 Likert 量表,共有 19 个项目。总得分越低,提示绞痛的可能性越大;总得分越高,提示绞痛的可能性越小。罗马 IV 标准被用作金标准。

结果

ICS 平均得分为 59.4±13.7。根据罗马 IV 标准,26.3%的婴儿患有绞痛。ROC 曲线下面积为 87.4%(95%CI=0.815-0.934,SE=0.30,p=0.001),ICS 最佳灵敏度值(88.6%)和最佳特异性值(70.5%)的截断值为 60.5。根据截断值,ICS 的阳性预测值为 51%,阴性预测值为 94%。

结论

土耳其版 ICS 具有较高的灵敏度和可接受的特异性,截断值为 60.5 时,预测效度良好。从事儿童领域工作的医疗保健专业人员可以使用 ICS 排除婴儿绞痛。