• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精准用药:即时、床边、数据驱动和个体化的脓毒症或感染性休克危重症患者抗生素治疗——一项两中心随机临床试验。

Right dose, right now: bedside, real-time, data-driven, and personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock-a two-centre randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Laboratory for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (LCCCI), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AI&II), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2022 Sep 5;26(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04098-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-022-04098-7
PMID:36064438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9443636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate antibiotic dosing may improve outcomes in critically ill patients but is challenging due to altered and variable pharmacokinetics. To address this challenge, AutoKinetics was developed, a decision support system for bedside, real-time, data-driven and personalised antibiotic dosing. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of its clinical implementation.

METHODS

In this two-centre randomised clinical trial, critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock were randomised to AutoKinetics dosing or standard dosing for four antibiotics: vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and ceftriaxone. Adult patients with a confirmed or suspected infection and either lactate > 2 mmol/L or vasopressor requirement were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was pharmacokinetic target attainment in the first 24 h after randomisation. Clinical endpoints included mortality, ICU length of stay and incidence of acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

After inclusion of 252 patients, the study was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the ciprofloxacin intervention group, the primary outcome was obtained in 69% compared to 3% in the control group (OR 62.5, CI 11.4-1173.78, p < 0.001). Furthermore, target attainment was faster (26 h, CI 18-42 h, p < 0.001) and better (65% increase, CI 49-84%, p < 0.001). For the other antibiotics, AutoKinetics dosing did not improve target attainment. Clinical endpoints were not significantly different. Importantly, higher dosing did not lead to increased mortality or renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, personalised dosing was feasible, safe and significantly improved target attainment for ciprofloxacin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was prospectively registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), NL6501/NTR6689 on 25 August 2017 and at the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2017-002478-37 on 6 November 2017.

摘要

背景

在危重病患者中,适当的抗生素剂量可能会改善治疗效果,但由于药代动力学的改变和变化,这具有一定挑战性。为了解决这一挑战,开发了 AutoKinetics,这是一种床边实时数据驱动和个性化抗生素剂量的决策支持系统。本研究评估了其临床实施的可行性、安全性和疗效。

方法

在这项两中心随机临床试验中,将脓毒症或感染性休克的危重病患者随机分配到 AutoKinetics 剂量组或四种抗生素的标准剂量组:万古霉素、环丙沙星、美罗培南和头孢曲松。纳入标准为乳酸盐>2mmol/L 或需要血管加压药的确诊或疑似感染的成年患者。主要结局是随机分组后 24 小时内的药代动力学目标达标率。临床终点包括死亡率、ICU 住院时间和急性肾损伤的发生率。

结果

纳入 252 例患者后,由于 COVID-19 大流行,研究提前终止。在环丙沙星干预组,主要结局在 69%的患者中达到,而对照组为 3%(OR 62.5,95%CI 11.4-1173.78,p<0.001)。此外,目标达标更快(26 小时,95%CI 18-42 小时,p<0.001)且更好(65%的增加,95%CI 49-84%,p<0.001)。对于其他抗生素,AutoKinetics 剂量并未改善目标达标率。临床终点无显著差异。重要的是,更高的剂量并未导致死亡率或肾衰竭的增加。

结论

在危重病患者中,个性化剂量是可行的、安全的,并显著提高了环丙沙星的目标达标率。

试验注册

该试验于 2017 年 8 月 25 日在荷兰临床试验注册中心(NTR)前瞻性注册(NTR6501/NTR6689),于 2017 年 11 月 6 日在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册(2017-002478-37)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f6a/9446762/b6c83330d1e8/13054_2022_4098_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f6a/9446762/43c6334fff10/13054_2022_4098_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f6a/9446762/b6c83330d1e8/13054_2022_4098_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f6a/9446762/43c6334fff10/13054_2022_4098_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f6a/9446762/b6c83330d1e8/13054_2022_4098_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Right dose, right now: bedside, real-time, data-driven, and personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock-a two-centre randomised clinical trial.精准用药:即时、床边、数据驱动和个体化的脓毒症或感染性休克危重症患者抗生素治疗——一项两中心随机临床试验。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 5;26(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04098-7.
2
Right Dose Right Now: bedside data-driven personalized antibiotic dosing in severe sepsis and septic shock - rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial.即刻精准:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的床旁数据驱动个体化抗生素剂量方案 - 一项多中心随机对照优效性试验的原理和设计。
Trials. 2019 Dec 18;20(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3911-5.
3
Right Dose, Right Now: Development of AutoKinetics for Real Time Model Informed Precision Antibiotic Dosing Decision Support at the Bedside of Critically Ill Patients.精准剂量,即刻给药:开发自动动力学以实现基于实时模型的重症患者床边精准抗生素给药决策支持。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 15;11:646. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00646. eCollection 2020.
4
Model-informed precision dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients: a multicentre randomised clinical trial.模型指导下的重症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素和环丙沙星的精准给药:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Dec;48(12):1760-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06921-9. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Failure of target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients and associated risk factors: a two-center prospective study (EXPAT).β-内酰胺类抗生素在危重症患者中未达到目标治疗效果的失败率及其相关危险因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究(EXPAT)。
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 15;24(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03272-z.
6
The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in critically ill patients: the DOLPHIN trial protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.β-内酰胺类和氟喹诺酮类药物治疗药物监测对重症患者临床结局的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的 DOLPHIN 试验方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 17;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4781-x.
7
Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial.降钙素原指导在危重症患者中缩短抗生素治疗时间的疗效和安全性:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):819-827. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00053-0. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.严重脓毒症的β-内酰胺输注(BLISS):一项前瞻性、双中心、开放标签随机对照试验,比较了连续性与间歇性β-内酰胺输注在重症严重脓毒症患者中的应用。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1535-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4188-0. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Target attainment of cefotaxime in critically ill children with meningococcal septic shock as a model for cefotaxime dosing in severe pediatric sepsis.以脑膜炎球菌性败血症性休克的危重症患儿为模型评价头孢噻肟的目标浓度,探讨其在严重儿童败血症中的给药剂量。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;38(7):1255-1260. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03535-w. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
Role of renal function in risk assessment of target non-attainment after standard dosing of meropenem in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.肾功能在标准剂量美罗培南治疗危重症患者后目标未达标风险评估中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Oct 21;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1829-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.重症监护病房中的靶控输注:一项范围综述
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1.
2
Subgroup-based model selection to improve the prediction of vancomycin concentrations.基于亚组的模型选择以改善万古霉素浓度的预测。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Sep 3;69(9):e0017425. doi: 10.1128/aac.00174-25. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
3
Improving Meropenem Quantification in a Compact SERS-Based Centrifugal Microfluidic Platform: Toward TDM of Antibiotics in ICU.

本文引用的文献

1
The future of antimicrobial dosing in the ICU: an opportunity for data science.重症监护病房抗菌药物给药的未来:数据科学的机遇。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;47(12):1481-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06549-1. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
A Risk Prediction Flowchart of Vancomycin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury to Use When Starting Vancomycin Administration: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.万古霉素给药开始时使用的万古霉素诱导急性肾损伤风险预测流程图:一项多中心回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;9(12):920. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120920.
3
Right Dose, Right Now: Development of AutoKinetics for Real Time Model Informed Precision Antibiotic Dosing Decision Support at the Bedside of Critically Ill Patients.
在基于表面增强拉曼光谱的紧凑型离心微流控平台中改进美罗培南定量分析:迈向重症监护病房抗生素的治疗药物监测
Anal Chem. 2025 Apr 15;97(14):7888-7896. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c06902. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
4
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00776-0.
5
Investigating the Association Between Mean Arterial Pressure on 28-Day Mortality Risk in Patients With Sepsis: Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.探讨脓毒症患者平均动脉压与28天死亡风险之间的关联:基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 5;14:e63291. doi: 10.2196/63291.
6
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Feb 24;12(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70037. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Risk factors for bloodstream infection in COVID-19 patients in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房中 COVID-19 患者血流感染的危险因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10420-1.
8
What do we know about micronutrients in critically ill patients? A narrative review.关于危重症患者的微量营养素,我们了解多少?一篇叙述性综述。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2025 Jan;49(1):33-58. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2700. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
9
Model-informed precision dosing of vancomycin in clinical practice: an intervention development study.临床实践中基于模型的万古霉素精准给药:一项干预措施开发研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01822-x. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
10
Artificial Intelligence to Close the Gap between Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review on Beta Lactams.人工智能缩小重症患者药代动力学/药效学靶点与临床结局之间的差距:关于β-内酰胺类药物的叙述性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Sep 6;13(9):853. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090853.
精准剂量,即刻给药:开发自动动力学以实现基于实时模型的重症患者床边精准抗生素给药决策支持。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 15;11:646. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00646. eCollection 2020.
4
Right Dose Right Now: bedside data-driven personalized antibiotic dosing in severe sepsis and septic shock - rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial.即刻精准:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的床旁数据驱动个体化抗生素剂量方案 - 一项多中心随机对照优效性试验的原理和设计。
Trials. 2019 Dec 18;20(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3911-5.
5
Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic knowledge on antibiotic dosing among intensive care professionals is insufficient: a cross-sectional study.临床相关的抗生素剂量调整的药代动力学知识在重症监护专业人员中是不足的:一项横断面研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 22;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2438-1.
6
Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit.重症监护病房患者的脓毒症:来自全球重症监护国家审计的数据分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 19;5(12):ofy313. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克的研究重点。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1400-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Evolution of high-level resistance during low-level antibiotic exposure.低水平抗生素暴露下高水平耐药性的演变。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 23;9(1):1599. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04059-1.
9
Unexplained mortality differences between septic shock trials: a systematic analysis of population characteristics and control-group mortality rates.不明原因的脓毒性休克试验死亡率差异:人群特征和对照组死亡率的系统分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5134-8. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables.基于 MIC 的剂量调整:事实与虚构。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):564-568. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx427.