EA 4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse et Therapeutique, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France.
UR 20201 ERPHAN, Université Versailles Saint Quentin, Garches, France.
Eur J Pain. 2022 Nov;26(10):2060-2073. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2032. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
To conduct a systematic review to identify which tools are being used to assess body perception disturbances in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and to provide an evidence-based recommendation in the selection of an assessment tool, based on measurement properties.
Five electronic databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Science Direct and Web of Science) were searched for English or French written articles, with no time restrictions. All original articles using a body perception assessment tool with adult patients with CRPS were selected, regardless of their design (controlled trials, single case, qualitative study). Two investigators screened abstracts, selected full articles and extracted data independently.
Thirty-eight full-text papers were obtained and three main methods to evaluate body perception disturbances were identified: The Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale, the Neglect-like Symptoms questionnaire adapted from Galer and the patient's body perception description. No full psychometric assessments were found. The Limb Laterality Recognition Task was also used in conjunction with another method.
Three main assessment methods for CRPS body perception disturbances are currently used. Full psychometric evaluation has not been completed for any of the assessment methods. As a consequence, we could not fully apply the COSMIN guideline. To date, there is no agreement concerning the use of a specific questionnaire or scale. The results indicate a need for further research such as psychometric properties of these questionnaires.
This systematic review identified body perception disturbances assessment methods and their the psychometric properties in order to provide help and guidance to researchers and clinicians to investigate those clinical features.
系统回顾以确定在复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)中用于评估身体感知障碍的工具,并根据测量特性为评估工具的选择提供循证建议。
搜索了五个电子数据库(EMBASE、Pubmed、PsycInfo、Science Direct 和 Web of Science),以获取英文或法文的文章,无时间限制。选择了所有使用 CRPS 成年患者身体感知评估工具的原始文章,无论其设计如何(对照试验、单个病例、定性研究)。两名调查员筛选摘要、选择全文并独立提取数据。
获得了 38 篇全文论文,并确定了三种主要的方法来评估身体感知障碍:巴斯身体感知障碍量表、改编自 Galer 的类似忽视症状问卷和患者的身体感知描述。没有发现完整的心理计量学评估。肢体偏侧性识别任务也与另一种方法一起使用。
目前使用三种主要的 CRPS 身体感知障碍评估方法。任何评估方法都没有完成完整的心理计量学评估。因此,我们无法完全应用 COSMIN 指南。迄今为止,对于使用特定问卷或量表没有达成共识。结果表明需要进一步研究这些问卷的心理计量学特性等。
本系统回顾确定了身体感知障碍的评估方法及其心理计量特性,以帮助和指导研究人员和临床医生研究这些临床特征。