• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《一种用于检测针对女性的隐形暴力的问卷的编制及心理计量学评估》

Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Questionnaire for the Detection of Invisible Violence against Women.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain.

Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almeria, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711127.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191711127
PMID:36078848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invisible violence against women (IVAW) can be understood as the set of attitudes, behaviors, and subtle beliefs that men use to subordinate women and that are culturally accepted. These behaviors can be a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV), so it is important to design tools that allow us to detect it early. The aim of this study was to design and psychometrically assess a questionnaire for the detection of invisible violence against women (Q-IVAW).

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive cross-sectional methodological study carried out in three phases: (1) development of the initial version; (2) pilot study ( = 51); and (3) final validation study ( = 990). The tool's reliability, validity, and legibility were assessed. To assess reliability, the internal consistency (Cronbach's α) was analyzed. The validity assessment included an analysis of content, criterion, and construct validity.

RESULTS

The EFA revealed that the Q-IVAW was comprised of five factors that explained 55.85% of the total variance found. The Q-IVAW showed very high reliability (α = 0.937), excellent content validity, and good construct validity. The criterion validity analysis showed a moderate correlation between A-IPVAW and Q-IVAW ( = 0.30; < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The psychometric assessment of the Q-IVAW yielded good results, which could support the tool's ability to assess how often women are subjected to inviable violent behaviors by their partners.

摘要

背景

隐形的针对女性的暴力(IVAW)可以被理解为一套男性用来控制女性并被文化所接受的态度、行为和微妙信念。这些行为可能是亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的一个风险因素,因此设计能够及早发现它的工具非常重要。本研究旨在设计和心理测量评估一种用于检测隐形针对女性的暴力(Q-IVAW)的问卷。

方法

这是一项在三个阶段进行的描述性横断面方法学研究:(1)初始版本的开发;(2)试点研究(n=51);和(3)最终验证研究(n=990)。评估了工具的可靠性、有效性和易读性。为了评估可靠性,分析了内部一致性(克朗巴赫的α)。有效性评估包括内容、标准和结构有效性分析。

结果

EFA 显示,Q-IVAW 由五个因素组成,解释了总方差的 55.85%。Q-IVAW 具有非常高的可靠性(α=0.937)、良好的内容有效性和良好的结构有效性。标准有效性分析显示 A-IPVAW 和 Q-IVAW 之间存在中度相关性(=0.30;<0.001)。

结论

Q-IVAW 的心理测量评估结果良好,这可能支持该工具评估女性伴侣对其施加不可接受的暴力行为的频率的能力。

相似文献

1
Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Questionnaire for the Detection of Invisible Violence against Women.《一种用于检测针对女性的隐形暴力的问卷的编制及心理计量学评估》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711127.
2
The Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Coping Inventory for Intimate Partner Violence Among Abused Iranian Women.亲密伴侣暴力中受虐伊朗妇女应对量表的编制与心理测量评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16670-NP16699. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023488. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Chinese nurses' preparedness and opinions in responding to intimate partner violence: An adaptation and validation study.中国护士应对亲密伴侣暴力的准备情况和意见:一项改编和验证研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3847-3859. doi: 10.1111/jan.15415. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
[French validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA) and experience of close relationships with students and perpetrators of domestic violence].[《性侵犯现代神话接受量表》(AMMSA)的法语验证以及与学生和家庭暴力施暴者亲密关系的体验]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):554-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Short version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence (MSDV 2.0) in Spanish-language: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation.西班牙语版约会暴力多维量表(MSDV 2.0)简版:工具开发与心理测量评估
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1610-1631. doi: 10.1111/jan.15300. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
A Short Measure of Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Development and Validation of the A-IPVAW-8 Scale.一种简短的女性亲密伴侣暴力接受度测量工具:A-IPVAW-8 量表的编制与验证。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):896-908. doi: 10.1177/10731911211000110. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Development of an early detection scale for intimate partner violence to occur in relationships under power and control.权力和控制下的亲密伴侣暴力发生早期检测量表的编制。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2021 Jan;18(1):e12369. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12369. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)-Short Form (CASR-SF).亲密伴侣暴力经历简短测量工具的开发:综合虐待量表(修订版)-简表(CASR-SF)。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 7;6(12):e012824. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012824.
9
Psychometric properties of Haj-Yahia's questionnaire of violence against women in a sample of married women in Tehran, Iran.伊朗德黑兰已婚女性样本中,Haj-Yahia 暴力侵害妇女问卷的心理测量学特性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12831-8.
10
Development and Validation of the Bystander Engagement Scale for Witnessed Intimate Partner Violence: A South Korean Version.发展和验证目睹亲密伴侣暴力旁观者干预量表:韩国版。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jul;39(13-14):2959-2980. doi: 10.1177/08862605231222902. Epub 2024 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire to Assess Attitudes Towards Invisible Gender-Based Violence (Q-AIGV).一份评估对无形性别暴力态度的问卷(Q-AIGV)的编制与心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Dec 9;2024:9977927. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9977927. eCollection 2024.
2
Subtle or Covert Abuse Within Intimate Partner Relationships: A Scoping Review.亲密伴侣关系中的隐性或隐蔽虐待:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):4090-4101. doi: 10.1177/15248380241268643. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
3
Dating Violence, Lifestyle and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Mexican Women University Students.墨西哥女大学生中的约会暴力、生活方式与2型糖尿病风险
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2025;21(5):e300124226536. doi: 10.2174/0115733998283227240117060452.

本文引用的文献

1
Domestic violence: an invisible pandemic.家庭暴力:一场无形的大流行。
Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;24(2):90-92. doi: 10.1111/tog.12798. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Wealth Inequality and Intimate Partner Violence: An Individual and Ecological Level Analysis Across 20 Countries.财富不平等与亲密伴侣暴力:对20个国家的个体及生态层面分析
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15568-NP15593. doi: 10.1177/08862605211016337. Epub 2021 May 19.
3
Determination of the factors affecting sexual violence against women in Turkey: a population-based analysis.确定影响土耳其妇女遭受性暴力因素的研究:基于人群的分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01333-1.
4
Rapid Review on the Associations of Social and Geographical Isolation and Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic.社会与地理隔离及亲密伴侣暴力关联的快速综述:对当前新冠疫情的启示
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 13;12:578150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.578150. eCollection 2021.
5
Cost of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and postpartum to health services: a data linkage study in Queensland, Australia.孕期和产后亲密伴侣暴力对卫生服务的成本:澳大利亚昆士兰州的一项数据链接研究。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021 Oct;24(5):773-779. doi: 10.1007/s00737-021-01130-7. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Considering gender-based violence in vaccine prioritisation strategies.在疫苗优先排序策略中考虑基于性别的暴力问题。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1345. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00532-8. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
A Short Measure of Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Development and Validation of the A-IPVAW-8 Scale.一种简短的女性亲密伴侣暴力接受度测量工具:A-IPVAW-8 量表的编制与验证。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):896-908. doi: 10.1177/10731911211000110. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
8
Sexism and its associated factors among adolescents in Europe: Lights4Violence baseline results.欧洲青少年中的性别歧视及其相关因素:Lights4Violence 基线结果。
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):354-363. doi: 10.1002/ab.21957. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
9
Gynaecological morbidities among married women and husband's behaviour: Evidence from a community-based study.已婚女性的妇科疾病与丈夫的行为:一项基于社区研究的证据
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):553-561. doi: 10.1002/nop2.660. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.学生对亲密伴侣暴力态度的跨文化差异:一项系统综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jul;23(3):1007-1022. doi: 10.1177/1524838020985565. Epub 2021 Jan 20.