Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274320. eCollection 2022.
Outdoor and early biting by mosquitoes challenge the efficacy of bed nets and indoor residual spraying against malaria in the Greater Mekong Subregion. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of outdoor residual spraying (ORS) for malaria vector-control in this region. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted between July 2018 and April 2019 in twelve villages in Karen (Kayin) state, Myanmar. Villages were randomly assigned to receive either a single round of ORS with a capsule suspension of lambda-cyhalothrin for two days in October or no intervention (six villages per group). The primary endpoint was the biting rate of malaria mosquitoes assessed with human-landing catch and cow-baited trap collection methods, and was analyzed with a Bayesian multi-level model. In the intervention villages, the proportion of households located within the sprayed area ranged between 42 and 100% and the application rate ranged between 63 and 559 g of active ingredient per hectare. At baseline, the median of Anopheles biting rate estimates in the twelve villages was 2 bites per person per night (inter-quartile range [IQR] 0-5, range 0-48) indoors, 6 bites per person per night (IQR 2-16, range 0-342) outdoors and 206 bites per cow per night (IQR 83-380, range 19-1149) in the cow-baited trap. In intention-to-treat analysis, it was estimated that ORS reduced biting rate by 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63-79) from Month 0 to Month 3 and by 79% (95% CI 62-88) from Month 4 to Month 6, considering control villages as the reference. In conclusion, ORS rapidly reduces the biting rates of malaria mosquitoes in a Southeast Asian setting where the vectors bite mostly outdoors and at a time when people are not protected by mosquito bed nets.
户外和早期蚊虫叮咬对大湄公河次区域的蚊帐和室内滞留喷洒控制疟疾的效果提出了挑战。本研究的目的是评估该地区户外滞留喷洒(ORS)对疟疾媒介控制的效果。2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 4 月,在缅甸克伦邦的 12 个村庄进行了一项基于群组的随机对照试验。村庄被随机分配接受为期两天的 ORS,即在 10 月使用氯氟氰菊酯胶囊悬液,或不接受干预(每组 6 个村庄)。主要终点是用人体降落捕获和牛诱饵陷阱收集方法评估疟疾蚊子的叮咬率,并采用贝叶斯多层次模型进行分析。在干预村庄,位于喷洒区域内的家庭比例在 42%至 100%之间,施用量在每公顷 63 至 559 克活性成分之间。在基线时,12 个村庄的按蚊叮咬率估计中位数为夜间室内每人 2 次叮咬(四分位距[IQR]0-5,范围 0-48),夜间户外每人 6 次叮咬(IQR 2-16,范围 0-342)和牛诱饵陷阱中每头牛夜间 206 次叮咬(IQR 83-380,范围 19-1149)。在意向治疗分析中,估计 ORS 将从第 0 个月到第 3 个月的叮咬率降低 72%(95%置信区间[CI]63-79),从第 4 个月到第 6 个月的叮咬率降低 79%(95% CI 62-88),以对照村庄为参考。总之,在东南亚地区,当蚊子主要在户外叮咬且人们没有蚊帐保护时,ORS 可迅速降低疟疾蚊子的叮咬率。