Suppr超能文献

评估基质血管成分(SVF)细胞联合皮下分离术治疗痤疮瘢痕的有效性:一项双盲随机对照临床试验研究。

Evaluating the effectiveness of stromal-vascular fraction (SVF) cells along with subcision method in the treatment of acne scars: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial study.

作者信息

Roohaninasab Masoumeh, Seifadini Azadeh, Atefi Najmolsadat, Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan Afsaneh, Goodarzi Azadeh, Hanifnia Amir Reza, Nouri Maryam, Zare Sona, Moradi Sepideh, Dehghani Abbas, Nilforoushzadeh Mohammad Ali, Behrangi Elham

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Dec;21(12):6928-6938. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15375. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subcision method is one of the main techniques for treatment of acne scars or stromal-vascular fraction (SVF) and combined therapy can improve treatment strategy.

OBJECTIVE

To use subcision method along with SVF for treatment of acne scar and comprised with alone subcision method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blind clinical trial study, 10 patients with acne scars were entered into the study. Subcision technique was randomly performed on one side of the face and subcision technique plus SVF on opposite side of the face. All patients were examined before treatment and after 3 months by Visioface for volume, area, and depth of scars, as well as thickness and density of the epidermis and dermis of the scars in question. In addition, doctor's and patients' satisfaction, tolerability, and safety were determined after 3 months of treatment. Finally, statistical analysis was done by SPPS, version 25.

RESULTS

In terms of volume and area of scars, the mean percent change was 46.55 ± 13.92 and 44.60 ± 5.76, for the case group, and 13.31 ± 9.27 and 11.28 ± 9.64 for the control group, respectively. So, combined therapy led to significant recovery compared with alone subcision method (p value < 0.001). In both interventions, the increase of density and thickness was proven after treatment, also a significant difference in complete, epidermal, and dermal thickness and epidermal density variables was observed between combined therapy and alone subcision (p value < 0.05). Mean score of doctor's and patients' satisfaction in combined therapy (7.10 ± 0.74 and 7.10 ± 0.99, respectively), was also significantly higher than subcision alone (5.50 ± 0.53 and 5.30 ± 1.25, respectively). Finally, no complications were observed in the patients.

CONCLUSION

According to the acquired results, combined therapy can be considered as effective and safe treatment for acne scars with significant higher efficacy compared with subcision alone.

摘要

背景

皮下分离术是治疗痤疮瘢痕或基质血管成分(SVF)的主要技术之一,联合治疗可改善治疗策略。

目的

将皮下分离术与SVF联合用于治疗痤疮瘢痕,并与单纯皮下分离术进行比较。

材料与方法

在这项双盲临床试验研究中,10例痤疮瘢痕患者纳入研究。在面部一侧随机进行皮下分离术,在面部另一侧进行皮下分离术加SVF。所有患者在治疗前和治疗3个月后通过Visioface检查瘢痕的体积、面积和深度,以及相关瘢痕表皮和真皮的厚度和密度。此外,在治疗3个月后确定医生和患者的满意度、耐受性和安全性。最后,使用SPPS 25版进行统计分析。

结果

在瘢痕体积和面积方面,病例组平均变化百分比分别为46.55±13.92和44.60±5.76,对照组分别为13.31±9.27和11.28±9.64。因此,与单纯皮下分离术相比,联合治疗导致显著恢复(p值<0.001)。在两种干预措施中,治疗后均证实密度和厚度增加,联合治疗与单纯皮下分离术在完整、表皮和真皮厚度以及表皮密度变量方面也存在显著差异(p值<0.05)。联合治疗中医生和患者的平均满意度评分(分别为7.10±0.74和7.10±0.99)也显著高于单纯皮下分离术(分别为5.50±0.53和5.30±1.25)。最后,患者未观察到并发症。

结论

根据所得结果,联合治疗可被认为是治疗痤疮瘢痕的有效且安全的方法,与单纯皮下分离术相比疗效显著更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验