Neuro-cognitive Psychology and Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Medical School EWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274579. eCollection 2022.
The Trail-Making-Test (TMT) is one of the most widely used neuropsychological tests for assessing executive functions, the brain functions underlying cognitively controlled thought and action. Obtaining a number of test scores at once, the TMT allows to characterize an assortment of executive functions efficiently. Critically, however, as most test scores are derived from test completion times, the scores only provide a summary measure of various cognitive control processes. To address this problem, we extended the TMT in two ways. First, using a computerized eye-tracking version of the TMT, we added specific eye movement measures that deliver a richer set of data with a higher degree of cognitive process specificity. Second, we included an experimental manipulation of a fundamental executive function, namely participants' ability to emphasize speed or accuracy in task performance. Our study of healthy participants showed that eye movement measures differed between TMT conditions that are usually compared to assess the cognitive control process of alternating between task sets for action control. This demonstrates that eye movement measures are indeed sensitive to executive functions implicated in the TMT. Crucially, comparing performance under cognitive control sets of speed vs. accuracy emphasis revealed which test scores primarily varied due to this manipulation (e.g., trial duration, number of fixations), and which were still more sensitive to other differences between individuals (e.g., fixation duration, saccade amplitude). This provided an experimental construct validation of the test scores by distinguishing scores primarily reflecting the executive function of emphasizing speed vs. accuracy and those independent from it. In sum, both the inclusion of eye movement measures and of the experimental manipulation of executive functions in the TMT enabled a more specific interpretation of the TMT in terms of cognitive functions and mechanisms, which offers more precise diagnoses in clinical applications and basic research.
连线测验(TMT)是评估执行功能的最广泛使用的神经心理学测试之一,执行功能是大脑进行认知控制思维和行动的功能。TMT 可以一次获得多个测试分数,从而有效地描述各种执行功能。然而,至关重要的是,由于大多数测试分数是从测试完成时间中得出的,因此分数仅提供了各种认知控制过程的综合度量。为了解决这个问题,我们以两种方式扩展了 TMT。首先,我们使用计算机化的 TMT 眼动追踪版本,添加了特定的眼动测量值,提供了更丰富的数据,具有更高的认知过程特异性。其次,我们包括了对基本执行功能的实验操作,即参与者在任务表现中强调速度或准确性的能力。我们对健康参与者的研究表明,眼动测量值在通常用于评估动作控制的任务集之间的认知控制过程的 TMT 条件之间有所不同。这表明眼动测量值确实对 TMT 中涉及的执行功能敏感。至关重要的是,比较速度与准确性强调的认知控制集下的表现揭示了哪些测试分数主要是由于这种操作而变化(例如,试验持续时间,注视次数),而哪些分数仍然对个体之间的其他差异更敏感(例如,注视持续时间,扫视幅度)。这通过区分主要反映强调速度与准确性的执行功能的分数和独立于该功能的分数,对测试分数进行了实验结构验证。总之,在 TMT 中包含眼动测量值和执行功能的实验操作,可以更具体地解释 TMT 对认知功能和机制的影响,从而在临床应用和基础研究中提供更精确的诊断。