Department of Surgery and Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Divisions of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Feb 1;207(3):261-270. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0157OC.
There are limited therapeutic options for patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome with inflammation-mediated lung injury. Mesenchymal stromal cells offer promise as immunomodulatory agents. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of allogeneic mesenchymal cells in mechanically-ventilated patients with moderate or severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure. Patients were randomized to two infusions of 2 million cells/kg or sham infusions, in addition to the standard of care. We hypothesized that cell therapy would be superior to sham control for the primary endpoint of 30-day mortality. The key secondary endpoint was ventilator-free survival within 60 days, accounting for deaths and withdrawals in a ranked analysis. At the third interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial halt enrollment as the prespecified mortality reduction from 40% to 23% was unlikely to be achieved ( = 222 out of planned 300). Thirty-day mortality was 37.5% (42/112) in cell recipients versus 42.7% (47/110) in control patients (relative risk [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.21; = 0.43). There were no significant differences in days alive off ventilation within 60 days (median rank, 117.3 [interquartile range, 60.0-169.5] in cell patients and 102.0 [interquartile range, 54.0-162.5] in control subjects; higher is better). Resolution or improvement of acute respiratory distress syndrome at 30 days was observed in 51/104 (49.0%) cell recipients and 46/106 (43.4%) control patients (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-3.21). There were no infusion-related toxicities and overall serious adverse events over 30 days were similar. Mesenchymal cells, while safe, did not improve 30-day survival or 60-day ventilator-free days in patients with moderate and/or severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.
对于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征伴有炎症介导的肺损伤的患者,治疗方法有限。间充质基质细胞作为免疫调节剂具有一定的前景。 评估同种异体间充质细胞在机械通气的中重度 COVID-19 诱导性呼吸衰竭患者中的疗效和安全性。 患者随机分为两组,每组接受 200 万细胞/公斤的两次输注或假输注,此外还接受标准治疗。我们假设细胞治疗在 30 天死亡率的主要终点上优于假对照。关键次要终点是 60 天内无呼吸机存活,在排序分析中计入死亡和退出。 在第三次中期分析中,数据和安全监测委员会建议停止试验,因为从 40%降低到 23%的预设死亡率不太可能实现( = 计划入组的 300 例中的 222 例)。细胞治疗组 30 天死亡率为 37.5%(42/112),对照组为 42.7%(47/110)(相对风险 [RR],0.88;95%置信区间,0.64-1.21; = 0.43)。在 60 天内脱机生存天数无显著差异(细胞治疗患者的中位秩为 117.3(四分位距,60.0-169.5),对照组为 102.0(四分位距,54.0-162.5);越高越好)。在 30 天时,观察到 51/104(49.0%)细胞治疗患者和 46/106(43.4%)对照组患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征缓解或改善(优势比,1.36;95%置信区间,0.57-3.21)。无输注相关毒性,30 天内总体严重不良事件相似。 间充质细胞虽然安全,但不能改善中重度 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的 30 天生存率或 60 天无呼吸机天数。