Kozhan Altynay, Saudabayeva Gulmira, Aitzhanova Roza, Zhiyenbayeva Saira, Zhumakaeva Bereke, Ibragimkyzy Shynar
Department of Psychology, Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Department of Pedagogy, Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2022 Aug 26;18(4):248-255. doi: 10.12965/jer.2244304.152. eCollection 2022 Aug.
The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of coping strategies among female track-and-field students of the first-third study years with different aggressiveness levels on the back of the coronavirus disease 2019-provoked self-isolation. The total sample of respondents comprised 360 female students majoring in Physical Education and Sports. All of them were enrolled in an online survey using the Anxiety, Frustration, Aggressiveness, and Rigidity methodology and Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory. The study revealed that first-year students with high levels of aggressiveness focused on emotions and their expression under stress more often than first-years with moderate aggressiveness levels. Similarly, an increased concentration on negative emotions display was inherent to respondents of the second study year. The transition from the first to the third study year was marked with consolidation and strengthening of negative coping strategies used by female track-and-field athletes. This represents one of the central reasons for the deterioration of their psycho-emotional state during the quarantine. The most widely applied stress response tactics of female students of all 3 study years were associated with positive thinking, active coping, and planning (≤0.05 with other coping strategies). Resort to psychoactive substances was noted less frequently (≤0.01 with other strategies). As for the emotional component, increased attention to emotions' expression and seeking of instrumental and emotional support were also chosen relatively often. The problematic issue needs further investigation in order to analyze whether stressful conditions persist or have decreased.
本研究的目的是对2019年冠状病毒病引发自我隔离背景下，不同攻击性水平的大一至大三女田径学生应对策略的有效性进行比较分析。受访者总样本包括360名体育教育与运动专业的女学生。她们均参与了一项在线调查，该调查采用了焦虑、挫折、攻击性和僵化程度量表以及应对问题的方向量表。研究表明，高攻击性水平的大一学生比中等攻击性水平的大一学生更常关注压力下的情绪及其表达。同样，二年级受访者也更倾向于表现出对负面情绪的关注。从大一到大三，女田径运动员使用的消极应对策略不断巩固和强化。这是她们在隔离期间心理情绪状态恶化的主要原因之一。所有三个年级的女学生最广泛应用的应激反应策略都与积极思考、积极应对和计划有关（与其他应对策略相比，P≤0.05）。较少有人诉诸精神活性物质（与其他策略相比，P≤0.01）。在情感方面，对情绪表达的更多关注以及寻求工具性和情感性支持也较为常见。这个有问题的问题需要进一步研究，以分析压力状况是持续存在还是已经减轻。
