• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低社会经济和高残疾美国(美国)人群中心房颤动的发生率和并发症:一种联合统计和机器学习方法。

Incidence and Complications of Atrial Fibrillation in a Low Socioeconomic and High Disability United States (US) Population: A Combined Statistical and Machine Learning Approach.

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Anthem Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Aug 30;2022:8649050. doi: 10.1155/2022/8649050. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/8649050
PMID:36110264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9448617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor socioeconomic status coupled with individual disability is significantly associated with incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related adverse outcomes, with the information currently lacking for US cohorts. We examined AF incidence/complications and the dynamic nature of associated risk factors in a large socially disadvantaged US population.

METHODS

A large population representing a combined poor socioeconomic status/disability (Medicaid program) was examined from diverse geographical regions across the US continent. The target population was extracted from administrative databases with patients possessing medical/pharmacy benefits. This retrospective cohort study was conducted from Jan 1, 2016, to Sep 30, 2021, and was limited to 18- to 80-year age group drawn from the Medicaid program. Descriptive and inferential statistics (parametric: logistic regression and neural network) were applied to all computations using a combined statistical and machine learning (ML) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 617413 individuals participated in the study, with mean age of 41.7 years (standard deviation "SD" 15.2) and 65.6% female patients. Seven distinct groups were identified with different combinations of low socioeconomic status and disability constraints. The overall crude AF incidence rate was 0.49 cases/100 person-years (95% confidence limit "CI" 0.40-0.58), with the lowest rate for the younger group (temporary assistance for needy family "TANF") (0.20, 95%CI 0.18-0.21), the highest rates for the older groups (age, blindness, or disability "ABD" duals-1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.58; long-term services and support "LTSS" duals-1.45, 95% CI 1.31-1.58), and the remaining four other groups in between the lower and upper rates. Based on independent effects after accounting for confounders in main effect modeling, the point estimates of odds ratios for AF status with various clinical outcomes were as follows: stroke (2.69, 95% CI 2.53-2.85); heart failure (6.18, 95% CI 5.86-6.52); myocardial infarction (3.71, 95% CI 3.49-3.94); major bleeding (2.26, 95% CI 2.14-2.38); and cognitive impairment (1.74, 95% CI 1.59-1.91). A logistic regression-based ML model produced excellent discriminant validity for high-risk AF outcomes (c "concordance" index based on training data 0.91, 95%CI 0.891-0.929), together with similar measures for external validity, calibration, and clinical utility. The performance measures for the ML models predicting associated complications with high-risk AF cases were good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of low socioeconomic status and disability contributes to AF incidence and complications, elevating risks to higher levels relative to the general population. ML algorithms can be used to identify AF patients at high risk of clinical events. While further research is definitely in need on this socially important issue, the reported investigation is unique in which it integrates the general case about the subject due to the different ethnic groups around the world under a unified culture stemming from residing in the US.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d21d/9448617/da554c417a81/IJCLP2022-8649050.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d21d/9448617/da554c417a81/IJCLP2022-8649050.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d21d/9448617/da554c417a81/IJCLP2022-8649050.001.jpg
摘要

背景

较差的社会经济地位加上个体残疾与房颤(AF)的发生和与房颤相关的不良结局显著相关,而目前美国队列缺乏这方面的信息。我们研究了在一个社会地位低下的美国人群中房颤的发生率/并发症以及相关危险因素的动态变化。

方法

从美国大陆不同地理区域的医疗补助计划中选取了一个具有代表性的、社会经济地位差/残疾的人群(医疗补助计划)。目标人群从具有医疗/药房福利的管理数据库中提取。这项回顾性队列研究于 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日进行,仅限于从医疗补助计划中抽取的 18 至 80 岁年龄组。使用统计和机器学习(ML)相结合的方法对所有计算进行描述性和推断性统计(参数:逻辑回归和神经网络)。

结果

共有 617413 人参与了研究,平均年龄为 41.7 岁(标准差“SD”为 15.2),65.6%为女性患者。根据不同的社会经济地位和残疾约束组合,确定了七个不同的组别。总的房颤粗发生率为 0.49/100 人年(95%置信区间“CI”为 0.40-0.58),最低的发生率是年龄较小的组(贫困家庭临时援助“TANF”)(0.20,95%CI 0.18-0.21),最高的发生率是年龄较大的组(年龄、失明或残疾“ABD”双重患者 1.51,95%CI 1.31-1.58;长期服务和支持“LTSS”双重患者 1.45,95%CI 1.31-1.58),其余四个组介于较低和较高的发生率之间。在主要效应建模中考虑混杂因素后,基于独立效应,各种临床结局的房颤状态的优势比点估计值如下:中风(2.69,95%CI 2.53-2.85);心力衰竭(6.18,95%CI 5.86-6.52);心肌梗死(3.71,95%CI 3.49-3.94);大出血(2.26,95%CI 2.14-2.38);认知障碍(1.74,95%CI 1.59-1.91)。基于逻辑回归的 ML 模型对高危房颤结局具有极好的判别有效性(基于训练数据的 c“一致性”指数为 0.91,95%CI 0.891-0.929),同时具有类似的外部有效性、校准和临床实用性衡量标准。用于预测高危房颤相关并发症的 ML 模型的性能指标良好到优秀。

结论

较差的社会经济地位和残疾状况导致房颤的发生和并发症增加,使风险相对于一般人群升高到更高水平。ML 算法可用于识别房颤患者的临床事件高风险。虽然这个社会重要问题肯定需要进一步研究,但所报道的研究是独特的,因为它将世界各地不同种族的普遍情况整合在一个统一的文化中,这些人都居住在美国。

相似文献

1
Incidence and Complications of Atrial Fibrillation in a Low Socioeconomic and High Disability United States (US) Population: A Combined Statistical and Machine Learning Approach.低社会经济和高残疾美国(美国)人群中心房颤动的发生率和并发症:一种联合统计和机器学习方法。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Aug 30;2022:8649050. doi: 10.1155/2022/8649050. eCollection 2022.
2
Incident atrial fibrillation and its risk prediction in patients developing COVID-19: A machine learning based algorithm approach.发生房颤及其对 COVID-19 患者的风险预测:一种基于机器学习的算法方法。
Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;91:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Revisiting the dynamic risk profile of cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multimorbidity in incident atrial fibrillation patients and five cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular outcomes: A machine-learning approach.重新审视初发性房颤患者心血管/非心血管共病的动态风险特征及五种心血管/非心血管结局:一种机器学习方法。
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 22;37(4):931-941. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12555. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and associated risk factors in a medicare population without prior CVD history: an analysis using statistical and machine learning algorithms.在无既往心血管疾病史的医疗保险人群中,心血管疾病(CVD)结局和相关危险因素:使用统计和机器学习算法的分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03297-6. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Prevalence/incidence of atrial fibrillation based on integrated medical/pharmacy claims, and association with co-morbidity profiles/multi-morbidity in a large US adult cohort.基于综合医疗/医药理赔数据的房颤患病率/发病率,以及其与大型美国成年队列中合并症/多种合并症的相关性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e14042. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14042. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
6
Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms.改善伴有和不伴有心房颤动的非抗凝患者的动态卒中风险预测:比较常见的临床风险评分和机器学习算法。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Aug 17;8(5):548-556. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab037.
7
Geographical variation and clustering are found in atrial fibrillation beyond socioeconomic differences: a Danish cohort study, 1987-2015.地理变异和聚集在房颤中存在,超越了社会经济差异:丹麦队列研究,1987-2015 年。
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00264-2.
8
Comparable ascertainment of newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation using active cohort follow-up versus surveillance of centers for medicare and medicaid services in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.在社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中,使用主动队列随访与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心监测对新诊断房颤进行的可比确定。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e94321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094321. eCollection 2014.
9
Machine learning-based identification of risk-factor signatures for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in primary prevention and post-stroke in clinical practice.基于机器学习的临床实践中未诊断的心房颤动一级预防和卒中后风险因素特征的识别。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Dec 13;9(1):16-23. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac013.
10
Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Relationship With Cardiovascular Events, Heart Failure, and Mortality: A Community-Based Study From the Netherlands.心房颤动的发生率及其与心血管事件、心力衰竭和死亡率的关系:来自荷兰的一项基于社区的研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;66(9):1000-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1314.

引用本文的文献

1
Social drivers in atrial fibrillation occurrence, screening, treatment, and outcomes: systematic-narrative hybrid review.心房颤动发生、筛查、治疗及预后中的社会驱动因素:系统叙述性混合综述
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 Jul 31;26(Suppl 4):iv50-iv60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae073. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Many Models, Little Adoption-What Accounts for Low Uptake of Machine Learning Models for Atrial Fibrillation Prediction and Detection?模型众多,应用寥寥——为何机器学习模型在心房颤动预测与检测中的应用率较低?
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 26;13(5):1313. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051313.
3
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and associated risk factors in a medicare population without prior CVD history: an analysis using statistical and machine learning algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the dynamic risk profile of cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multimorbidity in incident atrial fibrillation patients and five cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular outcomes: A machine-learning approach.重新审视初发性房颤患者心血管/非心血管共病的动态风险特征及五种心血管/非心血管结局:一种机器学习方法。
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 22;37(4):931-941. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12555. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Incident atrial fibrillation and its risk prediction in patients developing COVID-19: A machine learning based algorithm approach.发生房颤及其对 COVID-19 患者的风险预测:一种基于机器学习的算法方法。
Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;91:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
在无既往心血管疾病史的医疗保险人群中,心血管疾病(CVD)结局和相关危险因素:使用统计和机器学习算法的分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03297-6. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
4
Over-the-Counter Breast Cancer Classification Using Machine Learning and Patient Registration Records.使用机器学习和患者登记记录进行非处方乳腺癌分类
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;12(11):2826. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112826.
Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms.
改善伴有和不伴有心房颤动的非抗凝患者的动态卒中风险预测:比较常见的临床风险评分和机器学习算法。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Aug 17;8(5):548-556. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab037.
4
Improving Stroke Risk Prediction in the General Population: A Comparative Assessment of Common Clinical Rules, a New Multimorbid Index, and Machine-Learning-Based Algorithms.提高普通人群中风风险预测能力:常见临床规则、新的多病指数和基于机器学习算法的比较评估。
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jan;122(1):142-150. doi: 10.1055/a-1467-2993. Epub 2021 May 28.
5
Life Course Socioeconomic Status and Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure or Atrial Fibrillation in The Moli-Sani Study Cohort.莫利-萨尼研究队列中生命历程社会经济地位与心力衰竭或心房颤动住院风险
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Feb 24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab046.
6
Prevalence/incidence of atrial fibrillation based on integrated medical/pharmacy claims, and association with co-morbidity profiles/multi-morbidity in a large US adult cohort.基于综合医疗/医药理赔数据的房颤患病率/发病率,以及其与大型美国成年队列中合并症/多种合并症的相关性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e14042. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14042. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Association of household income and adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation.家庭收入与房颤患者不良结局的关系。
Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1679-1685. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316065. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Socioeconomic position and risk of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide Danish cohort study.社会经济地位与心房颤动风险:一项全国性丹麦队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jan;74(1):7-13. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212720. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
C HEST Score and Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Poststroke Patients: A French Nationwide Study.CHEST 评分与中风后患者心房颤动事件的预测:一项法国全国性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e012546. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012546. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Associations between socioeconomic status, atrial fibrillation, and outcomes: a systematic review.社会经济地位、心房颤动与预后之间的关联:一项系统综述
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Nov;16(11):857-873. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1533118. Epub 2018 Oct 15.