Suppr超能文献

新冠疫苗犹豫和拒绝的原因,以及促进疫苗接种的激励措施。

Factors underlying COVID-19 vaccine and booster hesitancy and refusal, and incentivizing vaccine adoption.

机构信息

CUNY Institute for Demographic Research, City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.

Austin W. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274529. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The paper investigates the factors underlying COVID-19 vaccine and booster hesitancy in the United States, and the efficacy of various incentives or disincentives to expand uptake. We use cross-sectional, national survey data on 3,497 U.S. adults collected online from September 10, 2021 to October 20, 2021 through the Qualtrics platform. Results from a multinomial logistic regression reveal that hesitancy and refusal were greatest among those who expressed a lack of trust either in government or in the vaccine's efficacy (hesitancy relative risk ratio, or RRR: 2.86, 95% CI: 2.13-3.83, p<0.001). Hesitancy and refusal were lowest among those who typically get a flu vaccine (hesitancy RRR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.21-0.36, p<0.001; refusal RRR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.05-0.13, p<0.001). Similar results hold for the intention to get a booster shot among the fully vaccinated. Monetary rewards (i.e., lottery ticket and gift cards) fared poorly in moving people toward vaccination. In contrast, the prospect of job loss or increased health insurance premiums was found to significantly increase vaccine uptake, by 8.7 percentage points (p<0.001) and 9.4 percentage points (p<0.001), respectively. We also show that the motivations underlying individuals' hesitancy or refusal to get vaccinated vary, which, in turn, suggests that messaging must be refined and directed accordingly. Also, moving forward, it may be fruitful to more deeply study the intriguing possibility that expanding flu vaccine uptake may also enhance willingness to vaccinate in times of pandemics. Last, disincentives such as work-based vaccination mandates that would result in job loss or higher health insurance premiums for those who refuse vaccination should be strongly considered to improve vaccine uptake in the effort to address the common good.

摘要

本文研究了美国 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫和加强针犹豫的背后因素,以及扩大接种范围的各种激励和抑制措施的效果。我们使用了 2021 年 9 月 10 日至 10 月 20 日通过 Qualtrics 平台在线收集的 3497 名美国成年人的横断面全国性调查数据。多变量逻辑回归的结果表明,对政府或疫苗效力缺乏信任的人犹豫不决和拒绝接种的可能性最大(犹豫相对风险比,或 RRR:2.86,95%置信区间:2.13-3.83,p<0.001)。通常接种流感疫苗的人犹豫不决和拒绝接种的可能性最低(犹豫 RRR:0.28,95%置信区间:0.21-0.36,p<0.001;拒绝 RRR:0.08,95%置信区间:0.05-0.13,p<0.001)。对于完全接种疫苗的人来说,接种加强针的意图也是如此。向人们提供金钱奖励(即彩票和礼品卡)在推动人们接种疫苗方面效果不佳。相比之下,我们发现失业或增加健康保险费的前景会显著增加疫苗接种率,分别增加 8.7 个百分点(p<0.001)和 9.4 个百分点(p<0.001)。我们还表明,个人犹豫不决或拒绝接种疫苗的背后动机各不相同,这反过来又表明,信息传递必须加以改进并相应地加以引导。此外,今后,深入研究扩大流感疫苗接种率也可能增强大流行时期接种疫苗意愿的这一有趣可能性可能会很有成果。最后,应强烈考虑实施以工作为基础的疫苗接种强制令等抑制措施,对于拒绝接种疫苗的人来说,这将导致失业或更高的健康保险费,以提高疫苗接种率,从而努力实现共同利益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b466/9498968/a3461fe57e3d/pone.0274529.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验