• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元担忧问卷土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire.

作者信息

Gündüz Anıl, Gündoğmuş İbrahim, Engin Betül, Bağlar Gonca, Gündüz Elvan Başak Usta

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey.

²Department of Psychiatry, Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022 Aug 24;59(3):218-225. doi: 10.29399/npa.27926. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.29399/npa.27926
PMID:36160071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9466641/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire in the Turkish version as a contribution to clinical practice.

METHOD

The research sample consisted of two groups. Cases were people who have General Anxiety Disorder (n=165) and controls were age and sex-matched healthy volunteers (n=158). To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, Meta-Worry Questionnaire, Metacognition Questionnaire-30, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire were used.

RESULTS

In this study, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of frequency and belief components were found 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. At the same time, excluding each item, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of these two components also remained above 0.90, regardless of which item was chosen. While the frequency component accounted for 69.07% of the total variance, the belief component accounted for 72.95%. The area under the ROC curve is 0.948 for the frequency component and 0.944 for the belief component. The construct validity of the scale was tested with Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the one-dimensional structure of the scale was shown. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, other scales which are related to metacognition were used.

CONCLUSION

All items in the tool displayed a high correlation with the overall questionnaire. High total variance of the scale indicates its high validity. These results suggest high reliability of the tool as well as consistency of every item it includes.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在调查土耳其语版元担忧问卷的有效性和可靠性,以对临床实践做出贡献。

方法

研究样本由两组组成。病例组为患有广泛性焦虑症的人(n = 165),对照组为年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者(n = 158)。为评估该量表的心理测量特性,使用了元担忧问卷、元认知问卷 - 30、贝克抑郁量表、贝克焦虑量表、宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷和广泛性焦虑症 - 7问卷。

结果

在本研究中,频率和信念分量表的克朗巴赫α系数值分别为0.92和0.94。同时,排除每个项目后,这两个分量表的克朗巴赫α系数值也均保持在0.90以上,无论选择哪个项目。频率分量表占总方差的69.07%,信念分量表占72.95%。频率分量表的ROC曲线下面积为0.948,信念分量表为0.944。通过探索性和验证性因素分析对该量表的结构效度进行了测试,并显示了该量表的一维结构。为评估该量表的心理测量特性,使用了其他与元认知相关的量表。

结论

该工具中的所有项目与总体问卷均显示出高度相关性。量表的高总方差表明其具有较高的有效性。这些结果表明该工具具有较高的可靠性以及其所包含的每个项目的一致性。

相似文献

1
The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire.元担忧问卷土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022 Aug 24;59(3):218-225. doi: 10.29399/npa.27926. eCollection 2022.
2
Validity and Reliability of Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 Questionnaire.认知注意综合征-1问卷的效度与信度
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 May;16(5):355-362. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.02.11.1. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
4
[The reliability and validity of Turkish Brief Measure of Worry Severity based on Turkish university students].基于土耳其大学生的《土耳其担忧严重程度简易量表》的信效度研究
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2009 Spring;20(1):68-74.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised.广泛性焦虑障碍量表修订版土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Oct;18(10):949-957. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0174. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Modified Breast Cancer Worry Scale.改良版乳腺癌担忧量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1681-1687.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Anxiety Inventory.《健康焦虑量表土耳其语版本的信效度研究》
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):325-331. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6383. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
9
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].[元认知的心理测量方法:临床人群的初步研究]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale: Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form.马萨诸塞州综合医院拔毛量表:土耳其语形式的效度和信度研究。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):2-10. doi: 10.5080/u25864.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised.广泛性焦虑障碍量表修订版土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Oct;18(10):949-957. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0174. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
The relations among worry, meta-worry, intolerance of uncertainty and attentional bias for threat in men at high risk for generalized anxiety disorder: a network analysis.在广泛性焦虑障碍高危男性中,担忧、元担忧、不确定性容忍度和对威胁的注意偏向之间的关系:网络分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02849-w.
3
[Adaptation and Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Disorders - Clinician Version (SCID-5/CV) to the Turkish Language].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版障碍的结构化临床访谈-临床医生版(SCID-5/CV)的土耳其语改编与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Spring;30(1):51-56.
4
Validity and Reliability of Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 Questionnaire.认知注意综合征-1问卷的效度与信度
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 May;16(5):355-362. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.02.11.1. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Thinking about worry: Investigation of the cognitive components of worry in children.关于担忧的思考:儿童担忧的认知成分研究
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.061. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)
Codas. 2013;25(2):191-2. doi: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000200017.
7
Meta-cognitive profiles in anxiety disorders.焦虑症中的元认知概况。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Oct 30;169(3):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.029. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
8
[Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms].《元认知问卷-30对土耳其人群的适应性、效度和信度及其与焦虑和强迫症状的关系》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Spring;19(1):67-80.
9
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.一种评估广泛性焦虑症的简短量表:GAD-7量表。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
10
A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30.元认知问卷简版:MCQ - 30的特性
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):385-96. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5.