Department of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05706-x.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of a wobble board training (WBT) course with and without cognitive intervention (CI) on balance, ankle proprioception and jump-landing kinetic parameters in active men with chronic ankle instability (CAI). METHODS: Twenty-one active men in the age range of 18-25 years with CAI were randomly divided into three groups of WBT for five weeks as follows: with CI (n = 7); without CI (n = 7); control (n = 7). In this study, balance was evaluated by Y-Balance Test and Balance Error Scoring System, proprioception was evaluated as active and passive replication of 15-degree inversion angle and Maximum inversion angle minus 5-degrees, and single-leg jump-landing test was used for measurement of kinetic variables as pre-test and post-test in similar conditions. RESULTS: Post-test of both groups of WBT with and without CI showed a significant improvement in all variables compared to pre-test (p ≤ 0.05); however, in post-test, there was no significant difference in any of the variables between WBT groups with and without CI (p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A course of WBT with and without CI leads to a significant improvement in balance, proprioception and jump-landing kinetic parameters, including time to stabilization and center of pressure displacement in active men with CAI. Although the WBT group with CI showed a greater improvement in mean than WBT group without CI, but the difference was not significant in any of the variables. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively Registered. irict.ir Identifier: IRCT20200617047818N1 on 05-02-2021.
背景:本研究旨在比较有和无认知干预(CI)的平衡板训练(WBT)课程对慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的活跃男性平衡、踝关节本体感觉和跳落地动力学参数的影响。
方法:21 名年龄在 18-25 岁之间的活跃男性 CAI 患者被随机分为 WBT 五周三组,分别为:有 CI(n=7);无 CI(n=7);对照组(n=7)。在这项研究中,平衡通过 Y 平衡测试和平衡错误评分系统进行评估,本体感觉通过主动和被动复制 15 度内翻角度和最大内翻角度减去 5 度进行评估,单腿跳落地测试用于测量动力学变量作为预测试和后测试在相似条件下。
结果:有和无 CI 的 WBT 两组的后测与前测相比,所有变量均有显著改善(p≤0.05);然而,在后测中,有和无 CI 的 WBT 两组之间的任何变量都没有显著差异(p≥0.05)。
结论:有和无 CI 的 WBT 课程可显著改善 CAI 活跃男性的平衡、本体感觉和跳落地动力学参数,包括稳定时间和中心压力位移。尽管有 CI 的 WBT 组的平均改善大于无 CI 的 WBT 组,但在任何变量中差异均无统计学意义。
试验注册:回顾性注册。irict.ir 标识符:IRCT20200617047818N1 于 2021 年 2 月 5 日注册。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018-1-30
J Sport Rehabil. 2019-8-1
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024-3-21
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-10-13
Gait Posture. 2019-2
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018-10-30
J Athl Train. 2018-7
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-7-21