O'Brien Ciara M, Duda Joan L, Kitas George D, Veldhuijzen van Zanten Jet J C S, Metsios George S, Fenton Sally A M
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 10;6(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00289-5.
This longitudinal study investigated whether changes in autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour were associated with variability in sedentary, standing and stepping time and, in turn, disease activity, systemic inflammation, pain and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
People with RA undertook assessments at baseline (T1, n = 104) and 6 months follow-up (T2, n = 54) to determine autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour (Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2), free-living sedentary, standing and stepping time (7 days activPAL3 wear), Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28), systemic inflammation (c-reactive protein [CRP]), pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and fatigue (Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue Scale). N = 52 participants provided complete data at T1 and T2.
In a series of models (A and B), path analyses examined sequential associations between autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour with activPAL3-assessed behaviours and, in turn, RA outcomes.
Models demonstrated good fit to the data. Model A (sedentary and stepping time): autonomous motivation was significantly negatively associated with sedentary time and significantly positively related to stepping time. In turn, sedentary time was significantly positively associated with CRP and pain. Stepping time was not significantly associated with any health outcomes. Model B (standing time): autonomous motivation was significantly positively associated with standing time. In turn, standing time was significantly negatively related to CRP, pain and fatigue.
Autonomous motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour is associated with sedentary and standing time in RA which may, in turn, hold implications for health outcomes.
这项纵向研究调查了减少久坐行为的自主动机和受控动机的变化是否与久坐、站立和行走时间的变异性相关,进而与类风湿性关节炎(RA)的疾病活动、全身炎症、疼痛和疲劳相关。
类风湿性关节炎患者在基线时(T1,n = 104)和随访6个月时(T2,n = 54)进行评估,以确定减少久坐行为的自主动机和受控动机(运动问卷-2中的行为调节)、自由生活中的久坐、站立和行走时间(佩戴7天activPAL3)、疾病活动评分-28(DAS-28)、全身炎症(c反应蛋白[CRP])、疼痛(麦吉尔疼痛问卷)和疲劳(疲劳多维评估量表)。N = 52名参与者在T1和T2时提供了完整数据。
在一系列模型(A和B)中,路径分析检查了减少久坐行为的自主动机和受控动机与activPAL3评估的行为之间的顺序关联,进而与类风湿性关节炎的结果之间的关联。
模型显示与数据拟合良好。模型A(久坐和行走时间):自主动机与久坐时间显著负相关,与行走时间显著正相关。反过来,久坐时间与CRP和疼痛显著正相关。行走时间与任何健康结果均无显著关联。模型B(站立时间):自主动机与站立时间显著正相关。反过来,站立时间与CRP、疼痛和疲劳显著负相关。
减少久坐行为的自主动机与类风湿性关节炎患者的久坐和站立时间相关,这可能进而对健康结果产生影响。