School of Computer and Information, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China.
Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Guizhou, Duyun 558000, China.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 29;2022:8449491. doi: 10.1155/2022/8449491. eCollection 2022.
Traditional texture cluster algorithms are frequently used in engineering; however, despite their widespread application, these algorithms continue to suffer from drawbacks including excessive complexity and limited universality. This study will focus primarily on the analysis of the performance of a number of different texture clustering algorithms. In addition, the performance of traditional texture classification algorithms will be compared in terms of image size, clustering number, running time, and accuracy. Finally, the performance boundaries of various algorithms will be determined in order to determine where future improvements to these algorithms should be concentrated. In the experiment, some traditional clustering algorithms are used as comparative tools for performance analysis. The qualitative and quantitative data both show that there is a significant difference in performance between the different algorithms. It is only possible to achieve better performance by selecting the appropriate algorithm based on the characteristics of the texture image.
传统的纹理聚类算法在工程中经常被使用;然而,尽管它们被广泛应用,这些算法仍然存在着复杂度过高和通用性有限等缺点。本研究主要集中于分析多种不同纹理聚类算法的性能。此外,还将从图像大小、聚类数量、运行时间和准确性等方面比较传统纹理分类算法的性能。最后,确定各种算法的性能边界,以确定未来应集中改进这些算法的哪些方面。在实验中,使用了一些传统的聚类算法作为性能分析的比较工具。定性和定量数据都表明,不同算法之间的性能存在显著差异。只有根据纹理图像的特点选择合适的算法,才能获得更好的性能。