Faculty of Health Sciences, Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Jan;49(1):178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
This study was aimed at comparing the learning efficacy of a traditional instructor-led lesson with that of a completely virtual, self-directed lesson in immersive virtual reality (IVR) in teaching basic point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) skills. We conducted a blinded, non-inferiority, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in which final-year medical students were randomized to an instructor-led (n = 53) or IVR (n = 51) lesson. Participants' learning efficacy was evaluated by blinded assessors, who rated each participant's performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) assessment tool.The mean total scores for participants were 11.0 points (95% confidence interval: 9.8-12.2) for the instructor-led lesson and 10.3 points (95% confidence interval: 9.0-11.5) for the IVR lesson. No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to total score (p = 0.36) or subgroup objectives of the OSAUS score (p = 0.34 for familiarity, p = 0.45 for image optimization, p = 0.96 for systematic approach and p = 0.07 for interpretation). Maintenance costs for both courses were estimated at 400 euros each. Startup costs for the instructor-led course were estimated 16 times higher than those for the IVR course. The learning efficacy of an instructor-led lesson on basic US did not differ significantly from that of a self-directed lesson in IVR, as assessed using the OSAUS. The results suggest that IVR could be an equivalent alternative to instructor-led lessons in future basic US courses, but further research is warranted to clarify the role of IVR in PoCUS courses.
本研究旨在比较传统带教式课程与沉浸式虚拟现实(IVR)自主式课程在基础床边超声(PoCUS)技能教学中的学习效果。我们进行了一项盲法、非劣效性、平行组、随机对照试验,将最后一年的医学生随机分为带教式(n=53)或 IVR 式(n=51)课程。由盲法评估者评估参与者的学习效果,使用客观结构化超声技能评估(OSAUS)评估工具对每位参与者的表现进行评分。带教式课程参与者的平均总分为 11.0 分(95%置信区间:9.8-12.2),IVR 课程参与者的平均总分为 10.3 分(95%置信区间:9.0-11.5)。两组在总评分(p=0.36)或 OSAUS 评分的亚组目标(熟悉度亚组:p=0.34,图像优化亚组:p=0.45,系统方法亚组:p=0.96,解释亚组:p=0.07)方面均无显著差异。两种课程的维护成本估计均为每门 400 欧元。带教式课程的启动成本估计比 IVR 课程高出 16 倍。使用 OSAUS 评估,基础 US 带教式课程的学习效果与 IVR 自主式课程无显著差异。结果表明,在未来的基础 US 课程中,IVR 可能是带教式课程的等效替代方案,但需要进一步研究以明确 IVR 在 PoCUS 课程中的作用。