Universidade de São Paulo, Avenue of Bandeirantes no 3900, University Campus-Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-902, Brazil.
Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 10;12(1):16989. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19857-3.
Resistance training with blood flow restriction (RTBFR) allows physically impaired people living with HIV (PWH) to exercise at lower intensities than traditional resistance training (TRT). But the acute and chronic cardiac and metabolic responses of PWH following an RTBFR protocol are unknown. The objective was to compare the safety of acute and chronic effects on hemodynamic and lipid profiles between TRT or RTBFR in PWH. In this randomized control trial, 14 PWH were allocated in RTBFR (G; n = 7) or TRT (G n = 7). Both resistance training protocols had 36 sessions (12 weeks, three times per week). Protocol intensity was 30% (G) and 80% (G). Hemodynamic (heart rate, blood pressure) and lipid profile were acutely (rest and post exercise 7th, 22nd, and 35th sessions) and chronically (pre and post-program) recorded. General linear models were applied to determine group * time interaction. In the comparisons between groups, the resistance training program showed acute adaptations: hemodynamic responses were not different (p > 0.05), regardless of the assessment session; and chronicles: changes in lipidic profile favors G, which significantly lower level of total cholesterol (p = 0.024), triglycerides (p = 0.002) and LDL (p = 0.030) compared to G. RTBFR and TRT induced a similar hemodynamic adaptation in PWH, with no significant risks of increased cardiovascular stress. Additionally, RTBFR promoted better chronic adequacy of lipid profile than TRT. Therefore, RTBFR presents a safe resistance training alternative for PWH.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02783417; Date of registration: 26/05/2016.
抗阻训练结合血流限制(RTBFR)允许患有 HIV 的身体功能障碍者(PWH)以低于传统抗阻训练(TRT)的强度进行运动。但是,目前尚不清楚 PWH 在进行 RTBFR 方案后急性和慢性的心脏和代谢反应。本研究的目的是比较 RTBFR 与 TRT 在 PWH 中的急性和慢性作用对血流动力学和血脂谱的安全性。在这项随机对照试验中,将 14 名 PWH 随机分配到 RTBFR(G;n=7)或 TRT(G,n=7)组。两种抗阻训练方案均有 36 个疗程(12 周,每周 3 次)。方案强度为 30%(G)和 80%(G)。急性(休息时和运动后第 7、22 和 35 次时)和慢性(试验前和试验后)记录血流动力学(心率、血压)和血脂谱。应用一般线性模型确定组*时间交互作用。在组间比较中,抗阻训练方案显示出急性适应性:无论评估时间如何,血流动力学反应均无差异(p>0.05);慢性方面:血脂谱的变化有利于 G 组,与 G 组相比,G 组总胆固醇(p=0.024)、甘油三酯(p=0.002)和 LDL(p=0.030)水平显著降低。RTBFR 和 TRT 在 PWH 中引起相似的血流动力学适应性,没有增加心血管压力的显著风险。此外,RTBFR 比 TRT 更能改善血脂谱的慢性适应性。因此,RTBFR 为 PWH 提供了一种安全的抗阻训练替代方案。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT02783417;注册日期:2016 年 5 月 26 日。