• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹紧急结肠切除术治疗缺血性结肠炎:倾向评分匹配比较。

Laparoscopic versus open emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis: a propensity score-matched comparison.

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 13;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00458-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-022-00458-4
PMID:36229844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9563494/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic colectomy is rarely performed for ischemic colitis. The aim of this propensity score-matched study was to compare preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details and short-term outcomes for emergent laparoscopic colectomy versus the traditional open approach for patients with ischemic colitis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 96 patients who underwent emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis between January 2011 and December 2020 (39 via laparoscopy, 57 via laparotomy) was performed. We compared short-term outcomes after using a one-to-one ratio and nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to obtain similar preoperative and intraoperative parameters in each group.

RESULTS

Patients in the open group experienced more surgical site complications (52.6% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.004), more intra-abdominal abscesses (47.3% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.003), longer need for ventilator support (20 days vs. 0 days, p < 0.001), more major complications (77.2% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.001), higher mortality (49.1% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.004), and longer hospital stay (32 days vs. 19 days, p = 0.001). After propensity score matching (31 patients in each group), patients undergoing open (vs. laparoscopy) had more surgical site complications (45.1% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.030) and required longer ventilator support (14 vs. 3 days, p = 0.039). After multivariate analysis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.024), APACHE II score (p = 0.001), and Favier's classification (p = 0.023) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis is feasible and is associated with fewer surgical site complications and better respiratory function, compared to the open approach.

摘要

介绍

腹腔镜结肠切除术很少用于缺血性结肠炎。本研究采用倾向评分匹配法,旨在比较腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗缺血性结肠炎的患者的术前特征、手术细节和短期结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间 96 例因缺血性结肠炎而行急诊结肠切除术的患者(腹腔镜 39 例,开腹 57 例)。我们比较了采用 1:1 比例和最近邻倾向评分匹配后,两组患者的短期结局。

结果

开放组患者的手术部位并发症(52.6% vs. 23.0%,p=0.004)、腹腔脓肿(47.3% vs. 17.9%,p=0.003)、机械通气时间(20 天 vs. 0 天,p<0.001)、主要并发症(77.2% vs. 43.5%,p=0.001)、死亡率(49.1% vs. 20.5%,p=0.004)和住院时间(32 天 vs. 19 天,p=0.001)均较高。经倾向评分匹配(每组 31 例)后,开放组(vs. 腹腔镜组)的手术部位并发症(45.1% vs. 19.4%,p=0.030)和机械通气时间(14 天 vs. 3 天,p=0.039)均较长。多因素分析显示,Charlson 合并症指数(p=0.024)、急性生理和慢性健康评分(p=0.001)和 Favier 分类(p=0.023)是死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜治疗缺血性结肠炎是可行的,可减少手术部位并发症,改善呼吸功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/e20e0bc62006/13017_2022_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/27a3117a5759/13017_2022_458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/d9a73d865d9d/13017_2022_458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/e20e0bc62006/13017_2022_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/27a3117a5759/13017_2022_458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/d9a73d865d9d/13017_2022_458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b5/9563494/e20e0bc62006/13017_2022_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open emergent colectomy for ischemic colitis: a propensity score-matched comparison.腹腔镜与开腹紧急结肠切除术治疗缺血性结肠炎:倾向评分匹配比较。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 13;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00458-4.
2
[Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].[多中心倾向评分匹配法比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直径大于2cm胃胃肠道间质瘤的疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;23(9):888-895. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200616-00366.
3
Predictors of mortality following emergency open colectomy for ischemic colitis: a single-center experience.缺血性结肠炎行急诊剖腹结肠切除术患者的死亡预测因素:单中心经验
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun 29;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00321-4.
4
Impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery on postoperative analgesia requirements after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a propensity-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopy.单切口腹腔镜手术对溃疡性结肠炎全结肠切除术后镇痛需求的影响:与多孔腹腔镜的倾向评分匹配比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;21(8):953-960. doi: 10.1111/codi.14668. Epub 2019 May 20.
5
Laparoscopy improves failure to rescue compared to open surgery for emergent colectomy.腹腔镜手术相较于开腹手术可改善急症结肠切除术的抢救失败率。
Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):835-844. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00803-9. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Complications after laparoscopic and open subtotal colectomy for inflammatory colitis: a case-matched comparison.腹腔镜和开腹次全结肠切除术治疗炎症性结肠炎的并发症:病例对照比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;15(11):1399-405. doi: 10.1111/codi.12330.
7
Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications than open colectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术与开腹结肠切除术相比,术后并发症发生率更低:一项倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):382-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12537.
8
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a case-matched analysis from a nationwide database.腹腔镜与开放全结肠切除回直肠吻合术的短期结局:来自全国性数据库的病例匹配分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Nov;20(11):767-773. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1539-y. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.腹腔镜与开放全结肠切除术:一项病例匹配的比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Apr;19(4):531-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8806-0. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
10
Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis.完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术的比较:倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5275-5282. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5601-2. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections: a mapped systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠切除术的成本比较:已发表研究的映射系统评价与荟萃分析
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr 17;9:21. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-73. eCollection 2024.
2
The Global Burden of Vascular Intestinal Disorders in 204 Countries and Territories From 1990 to 2019: Global Burden of Diseases Study.204 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2019 年血管性肠病负担的全球评估:全球疾病负担研究。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Sep 26;68:1606297. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606297. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Reintervention for Intraperitoneal Leaks After Colonic Surgery: Do We Need a Routine Stoma?腹腔镜再次干预结肠手术后腹腔内漏:我们需要常规造口吗?
Surg Innov. 2022 Dec;29(6):697-704. doi: 10.1177/15533506211070177. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Predictors of failure to reach target sample size in surgical randomized trials.外科随机试验中未达到目标样本量的预测因素。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):176-177. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab401.
3
Sequential Approach for a Critical-View COlectomy (SACCO): A Laparoscopic Technique to Reduce Operative Time and Complications in IBD Acute Severe Colitis.
用于关键视野结肠切除术的序贯方法(SACCO):一种减少炎症性肠病急性重症结肠炎手术时间和并发症的腹腔镜技术
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 21;9(10):3382. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103382.
4
Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of surgical site infections compared to the open approach for colorectal procedures: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术相比,可降低结直肠手术部位感染的发生率:一项荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02293-8. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
Predictors of mortality following emergency open colectomy for ischemic colitis: a single-center experience.缺血性结肠炎行急诊剖腹结肠切除术患者的死亡预测因素:单中心经验
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun 29;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00321-4.
6
Colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic extended left colectomy: techniques and outcome.腹腔镜左半结肠扩大切除术:技术与结果
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1189-1194. doi: 10.1111/codi.15018. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开腹急诊乙状结肠切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1173-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04490-9. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
The Pathophysiology, Presentation and Management of Ischaemic Colitis: A Systematic Review.缺血性结肠炎的病理生理学、临床表现和治疗:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):927-938. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05248-9.
9
Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances.卫生技术评估中的倾向得分方法:原理、扩展应用及最新进展
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 18;10:973. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00973. eCollection 2019.
10
Predictive factors of mortality after colectomy in ischemic colitis: an ACS-NSQIP database study.缺血性结肠炎结肠切除术后死亡的预测因素:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库研究
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Nov 2;2(1):e000126. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000126. eCollection 2017.