• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你会分享那些对自己没用但可能对别人有用的个人信息吗?

Do you share your personally useless information if others may benefit from it?

机构信息

Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence (CIPCE), School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0276062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276062. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276062
PMID:36251685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9576053/
Abstract

Information is personally useless if its beholder cannot individually benefit from it further unless she shares it with those who can exploit that information to increase their mutual outcome. We study sharing such information anonymously in a non-strategic and non-competitive setting, where selfish and cooperative motives align. Although sharing information was cost-free and resulted in expected mutual payoff, almost all subjects showed some levels of hesitancy toward sharing information, and it was more severe in the introverts. According to our mechanistic model, this irrationality could arise because of the excessive subjective value of personally useless information and low other-regarding motives, that necessitated over-attainable personal benefit to drive sharing. Interestingly, other-regarding element correlated with the subjects' belief about how others are cooperative in general. In addition, sensitivity to the value of information correlated with their extraversion level. The results open a new window towards understanding inefficient motives that deprive people of collective benefit.

摘要

如果信息的使用者无法从中受益,那么这些信息对其个人而言毫无用处,除非他将这些信息与能够利用这些信息来增加共同收益的人分享。我们在非策略性和非竞争性的环境中匿名研究信息共享问题,在这种环境下,自私和合作的动机是一致的。尽管分享信息是免费的,并且会带来预期的共同回报,但几乎所有的参与者在分享信息时都表现出了一定程度的犹豫,而内向者的犹豫程度更为严重。根据我们的机械模型,这种非理性可能是由于个人无用信息的主观价值过高和其他关注因素较低,这需要过高的个人利益来驱动信息共享。有趣的是,其他关注因素与参与者对他人普遍合作程度的信念有关。此外,对信息价值的敏感性与他们的外向程度有关。这些结果为理解导致人们无法获得集体利益的低效动机开辟了一个新的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/83214d36e510/pone.0276062.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/e72fb38ea907/pone.0276062.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/5dc56691a08b/pone.0276062.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/34426961b2bc/pone.0276062.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/6e478f6caa22/pone.0276062.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/83214d36e510/pone.0276062.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/e72fb38ea907/pone.0276062.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/5dc56691a08b/pone.0276062.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/34426961b2bc/pone.0276062.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/6e478f6caa22/pone.0276062.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7397/9576053/83214d36e510/pone.0276062.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Do you share your personally useless information if others may benefit from it?你会分享那些对自己没用但可能对别人有用的个人信息吗?
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0276062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276062. eCollection 2022.
2
The indirect nature of social motives: the relation of social approach and avoidance motives with likeability via extraversion and agreeableness.社会动机的间接性:外向性和宜人性通过社交趋近和回避动机与喜爱度的关系。
J Pers. 2015 Feb;83(1):97-105. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12086. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
3
Alcohol attitudes, motives, norms, and personality traits longitudinally classify nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers using discriminant function analysis.使用判别函数分析,从饮酒态度、动机、规范和人格特质方面对不饮酒者、适度饮酒者和暴饮者进行纵向分类。
Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making.社会决策中的社会动机与策略性虚假陈述。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Mar;86(3):419-34. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.419.
5
Normal and Maladaptive Personality Traits as Predictors of Motives for Social Media Use and Its Effects on Well-Being.正常和适应不良的人格特质可预测社交媒体使用的动机及其对幸福感的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Jun;124(3):1070-1092. doi: 10.1177/0033294120922495. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Sharing health information online in South Korea: motives, topics, and antecedents.韩国的在线健康信息分享:动机、话题及影响因素
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):182-192. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax074.
7
Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people.谁喝酒以及为何喝酒?关于年轻人饮酒动机背后的社会人口统计学、个性及情境因素的综述。
Addict Behav. 2006 Oct;31(10):1844-57. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.028. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
8
Make the connection: dealing with the differences in people.建立联系:应对人与人之间的差异。
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2000 May-Jun;14(3):124-30.
9
Traits and motives: toward an integration of two traditions in personality research.特质与动机:走向人格研究中两种传统的整合
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):230-50. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.230.
10
Relations between big five traits and fundamental motives.大五人格特质与基本动机之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):795-802. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.3.795-802.

本文引用的文献

1
The neural encoding of information prediction errors during non-instrumental information seeking.非工具性信息寻求过程中信息预测误差的神经编码。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 17;8(1):6134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24566-x.
2
A neural model of valuation and information virality.一种估值与信息传播的神经模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):2881-2886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615259114. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants.合作、决策时间与文化:针对美国和印度参与者的在线实验
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171252. eCollection 2017.
4
Intrinsic Valuation of Information in Decision Making under Uncertainty.不确定性下决策中信息的内在估值
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jul 14;12(7):e1005020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005020. eCollection 2016 Jul.
5
Informing others is associated with behavioral and neural signatures of value.告知他人与价值的行为和神经特征相关。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1114-23. doi: 10.1037/xge0000122.
6
A Common Mechanism Underlying Food Choice and Social Decisions.食物选择和社会决策背后的共同机制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 13;11(10):e1004371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004371. eCollection 2015 Oct.
7
A Neurocomputational Model of Altruistic Choice and Its Implications.利他选择的神经计算模型及其意义。
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):451-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.031.
8
Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis.个人奖励与替代性奖励的共同和不同神经关联:一项定量荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:244-253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.056. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups.流言蜚语和排斥会促进群体合作。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):656-64. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510184. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
10
Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding.自我表露信息本质上是有回报的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8038-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202129109. Epub 2012 May 7.