Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Postgrad Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;68(4):199-206. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_1197_21.
: Risk assessment with prognostic scoring, though important, is scarcely studied in emergency surgical patients with COVID-19 infection.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult emergency surgical patients with COVID-19 infection in our institute from 1 May 2020 to 31 October 2021 to find the 30-day postoperative mortality and predictive accuracy of prognostic scores. We assessed the demographic data, prognostic risk scores (American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Classification (ASA-PS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Quick SOFA (qSOFA), Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scores), surgical and anesthetic factors. We assessed the postoperative morbidity using the Clavien-Dindo scale and recorded the 30-day mortality. Correlation of prognostic scores and mortality was evaluated using Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), Youden's index and Hosmer- Lemeshow goodness of fit model.
Emergency surgery was performed in 67 COVID-19 patients with postoperative complication and 30-day mortality rate of 33% and 19%, respectively. A positive qSOFA and ASAPS IIIE/IVE had a 9.03- and 12.7-times higher risk of mortality compared to a negative qSOFA and ASA-PS IE/IIE (P < 0.001), respectively. Every unit increase of SOFA, POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores was associated with a 50%, 18% and 17% higher risk of mortality, respectively. SOFA, POSSUM and P-POSSUM AUCROC curves showed good discrimination between survivors and non-survivors (AUC 0.8829, 0.85 and 0.86, respectively).
SOFA score has a higher sensitivity to predict 30-day postoperative mortality as compared to POSSUM and P-POSSUM. However, in absence of a control group of non-COVID-19 patients, actual risk attributable to COVID-19 infection could not be determined.
尽管预后评分的风险评估很重要,但在患有 COVID-19 感染的急诊外科患者中,几乎没有研究。
我们对 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间我院收治的 COVID-19 感染成年急诊外科患者进行了回顾性队列研究,以寻找 30 天术后死亡率和预后评分的预测准确性。我们评估了人口统计学数据、预后风险评分(美国麻醉医师协会-身体状况分类(ASA-PS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、快速 SOFA(qSOFA)、生理和手术严重程度评分用于计数死亡率和发病率(POSSUM)和朴茨茅斯-POSSUM(P-POSSUM)评分)、手术和麻醉因素。我们使用 Clavien-Dindo 量表评估术后并发症,并记录 30 天死亡率。使用单因素 Cox 比例风险回归、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)、Youden 指数和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度模型评估预后评分与死亡率的相关性。
对 67 例 COVID-19 患者进行了急诊手术,术后并发症发生率为 30%,30 天死亡率为 19%。与 qSOFA 阴性和 ASAPS IIIE/IVE 相比,qSOFA 阳性和 ASAPS IIIE/IVE 的死亡率风险高 9.03 倍和 12.7 倍(P < 0.001)。SOFA、POSSUM 和 P-POSSUM 评分每增加一个单位,死亡率分别增加 50%、18%和 17%。SOFA、POSSUM 和 P-POSSUM 的 AUCROC 曲线显示对存活者和非存活者具有良好的区分能力(AUC 分别为 0.8829、0.85 和 0.86)。
与 POSSUM 和 P-POSSUM 相比,SOFA 评分对预测 30 天术后死亡率的敏感性更高。然而,由于没有 COVID-19 患者的对照组,因此无法确定 COVID-19 感染实际导致的风险。