Won Gayeon, Chi Na-Kyoung, Park Yebin
College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan Campus, Gobong-ro 79, Iksan 54596, Korea.
Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 28;9(10):536. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100536.
In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of commercial vaccines against PPE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Of the 373 articles reviewed, 16 fulfilled the pre-specified inclusion criteria. Three independent reviewers extracted the data, and vaccine effectiveness was assessed using the outcomes of interest. The majority of studies had a low or unclear risk of bias as assessed using the ARRIVE guidelines. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that the vaccination resulted in statistically significant reductions in bacterial fecal shedding (odds ratio, OR = 0.122, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.054−0.278) and mortality rate (risk ratio, RR = 0.199; 95% CI, 0.066−0.605). Furthermore, ADWG was significantly increased in the vaccinated pigs compared to the unvaccinated controls (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.606, 95% CI 0.243−0.969). In the subgroup analysis, the production phase and study type significantly influenced the effect size (p < 0.1). The Egger’s regression test showed no evidence of publication bias (p > 0.1). The effectiveness of commercially available vaccines against PPE-related weight loss, fecal shedding, and mortality suggests that the vaccines may help control PPE on affected swine farms.
在本研究中,根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单,进行了一项系统评价和Meta分析,以评估商业疫苗对猪增生性肠炎(PPE)的疗效。在检索的373篇文章中,有16篇符合预先设定的纳入标准。由三名独立评审员提取数据,并使用感兴趣的结果评估疫苗效力。根据ARRIVE指南评估,大多数研究的偏倚风险较低或不明确。Meta分析结果表明,接种疫苗使粪便细菌排出量(优势比,OR = 0.122,95%置信区间,CI 0.054−0.278)和死亡率(风险比,RR = 0.199;95% CI,0.066−0.605)在统计学上显著降低。此外,与未接种疫苗的对照组相比,接种疫苗的猪平均日增重显著增加(标准化均数差(SMD)= 0.606,95% CI 0.243−0.969)。在亚组分析中,生产阶段和研究类型对效应量有显著影响(p < 0.1)。Egger回归检验未显示发表偏倚的证据(p > 0.1)。市售疫苗对与PPE相关的体重减轻、粪便排出和死亡率的有效性表明,这些疫苗可能有助于控制受影响猪场的PPE。