• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为感觉预测误差后果的听觉错误感知和幻听感知的神经生物学特征。

Neurobiological Signatures of Auditory False Perception and Phantom Perception as a Consequence of Sensory Prediction Errors.

作者信息

Ahn Min-Hee, Alsabbagh Nour, Lee Hyo-Jeong, Kim Hyung-Jong, Jung Myung-Hun, Hong Sung-Kwang

机构信息

Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;11(10):1501. doi: 10.3390/biology11101501.

DOI:10.3390/biology11101501
PMID:36290405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9598671/
Abstract

In this study, we hypothesized that top-down sensory prediction error due to peripheral hearing loss might influence sensorimotor integration using the efference copy (EC) signals as functional connections between auditory and motor brain areas. Using neurophysiological methods, we demonstrated that the auditory responses to self-generated sound were not suppressed in a group of patients with tinnitus accompanied by significant hearing impairment and in a schizophrenia group. However, the response was attenuated in a group with tinnitus accompanied by mild hearing impairment, similar to a healthy control group. The bias of attentional networks to self-generated sound was also observed in the subjects with tinnitus with significant hearing impairment compared to those with mild hearing impairment and healthy subjects, but it did not reach the notable disintegration found in those in the schizophrenia group. Even though the present study had significant constraints in that we did not include hearing loss subjects without tinnitus, these results might suggest that auditory deafferentation (hearing loss) may influence sensorimotor integration process using EC signals. However, the impaired sensorimotor integration in subjects with tinnitus with significant hearing impairment may have resulted from aberrant auditory signals due to sensory loss, not fundamental deficits in the reafference system, as the auditory attention network to self-generated sound is relatively well preserved in these subjects.

摘要

在本研究中,我们假设由于外周听力损失导致的自上而下的感觉预测误差可能会利用作为听觉和运动脑区之间功能连接的传出副本(EC)信号来影响感觉运动整合。我们采用神经生理学方法证明,在一组伴有明显听力障碍的耳鸣患者和一组精神分裂症患者中,对自身产生声音的听觉反应并未受到抑制。然而,在一组伴有轻度听力障碍的耳鸣患者中,其反应有所减弱,这与健康对照组相似。与轻度听力障碍患者和健康受试者相比,在伴有明显听力障碍的耳鸣受试者中也观察到了注意力网络对自身产生声音的偏向,但未达到精神分裂症组中发现的明显解体程度。尽管本研究存在显著局限性,即我们未纳入无耳鸣的听力损失受试者,但这些结果可能表明听觉传入神经阻滞(听力损失)可能会利用EC信号影响感觉运动整合过程。然而,伴有明显听力障碍的耳鸣受试者中感觉运动整合受损可能是由于感觉丧失导致的异常听觉信号所致,而非再传入系统的根本缺陷,因为这些受试者对自身产生声音的听觉注意力网络相对保存完好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/5e2c28e2dcf7/biology-11-01501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/55fdcc2b9cf7/biology-11-01501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/c7f176eb1021/biology-11-01501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/4ed791646a02/biology-11-01501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/5e2c28e2dcf7/biology-11-01501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/55fdcc2b9cf7/biology-11-01501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/c7f176eb1021/biology-11-01501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/4ed791646a02/biology-11-01501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/9598671/5e2c28e2dcf7/biology-11-01501-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurobiological Signatures of Auditory False Perception and Phantom Perception as a Consequence of Sensory Prediction Errors.作为感觉预测误差后果的听觉错误感知和幻听感知的神经生物学特征。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;11(10):1501. doi: 10.3390/biology11101501.
2
Is the posterior cingulate cortex an on-off switch for tinnitus?: A comparison between hearing loss subjects with and without tinnitus.后扣带皮层是否是耳鸣的开关键?:听力损失伴耳鸣与不伴耳鸣患者的比较。
Hear Res. 2021 Nov;411:108356. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108356. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Cortical Oscillatory Signatures Reveal the Prerequisites for Tinnitus Perception: A Comparison of Subjects With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With and Without Tinnitus.皮质振荡特征揭示耳鸣感知的先决条件:突发性感音神经性听力损失伴耳鸣与不伴耳鸣受试者的比较
Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 27;14:596647. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.596647. eCollection 2020.
4
Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.基于体素的分析揭示了听力损失和耳鸣患者的声辐射宏观结构变化。
J Neurosci. 2021 May 5;41(18):3958-3965. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2996-20.2021. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
Reduced sound-evoked and resting-state BOLD fMRI connectivity in tinnitus.耳鸣患者听觉诱发和静息状态 fMRI 连接的减少。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Aug 31;20:637-649. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.029. eCollection 2018.
6
Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception.预测编码和随机共振作为听觉幻觉感知的基本原理。
Brain. 2023 Dec 1;146(12):4809-4825. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad255.
7
Spontaneous brain activity underlying auditory hallucinations in the hearing-impaired.听力受损者听觉幻觉的自发性大脑活动。
Cortex. 2021 Mar;136:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Is it necessary to differentiate tinnitus from auditory hallucination in schizophrenic patients?在精神分裂症患者中,有必要区分耳鸣和幻听吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2005 May;119(5):352-5. doi: 10.1258/0022215053945796.
9
No auditory experience, no tinnitus: Lessons from subjects with congenital- and acquired single-sided deafness.没有听觉体验,就没有耳鸣:来自先天性和后天性单侧耳聋患者的经验教训。
Hear Res. 2017 Oct;354:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Top-down and bottom-up neurodynamic evidence in patients with tinnitus.耳鸣患者的自上而下和自下而上的神经动力学证据。
Hear Res. 2016 Dec;342:86-100. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurobiology of Behavior-Influences of Neuropsychiatric Disorders on Neurobiology and Behavior.行为神经生物学——神经精神疾病对神经生物学及行为的影响
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;12(6):807. doi: 10.3390/biology12060807.

本文引用的文献

1
Decreasing dorsal cochlear nucleus activity ameliorates noise-induced tinnitus perception in mice.背侧耳蜗核活动减少可改善小鼠噪声诱导的耳鸣感知。
BMC Biol. 2022 May 12;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01288-1.
2
The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency.前向模型:小脑在运动控制和能动感中作用的统一理论。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Apr 15;15:644059. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.644059. eCollection 2021.
3
Hippocampus plays a role in speech feedback processing.海马在言语反馈处理中起作用。
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117319. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Topographic specificity of alpha power during auditory spatial attention.听觉空间注意时 alpha 功率的地形特异性。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116360. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116360. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Axonal sprouting in the dorsal cochlear nucleus affects gap‑prepulse inhibition following noise exposure.耳蜗背核中的轴突发芽会影响噪声暴露后的间隔预脉冲抑制。
Int J Mol Med. 2019 Oct;44(4):1473-1483. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4316. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
A New Perspective on Predictive Motor Signaling.预测性运动信号的新视角。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):R232-R243. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.033.
7
The absence of resting-state high-gamma cross-frequency coupling in patients with tinnitus.耳鸣患者静息状态下高伽马跨频率耦合的缺失
Hear Res. 2017 Dec;356:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
The hippocampus as a predictive map.海马体作为一个预测图。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Nov;20(11):1643-1653. doi: 10.1038/nn.4650. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
9
A cerebellum-like circuit in the auditory system cancels responses to self-generated sounds.听觉系统中类似小脑的回路会消除对自身发出声音的反应。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jul;20(7):943-950. doi: 10.1038/nn.4567. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Top-down and bottom-up neurodynamic evidence in patients with tinnitus.耳鸣患者的自上而下和自下而上的神经动力学证据。
Hear Res. 2016 Dec;342:86-100. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 8.