Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;19(20):13652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013652.
Blue-collar workers have, on average, poorer health than white-collar workers. Existing worksite health promotion programs (WHPPs) are often not successful among blue-collar workers. This study evaluates the effect of the Citizen Science-based WHPP on the targeted lifestyle behaviors among construction workers. The data of 114 participants were retrieved from questionnaires before (T0) and after (T1) the WHPP. Outcome measures were mean and categorical changes in daily fruit and vegetable intake and weekly leisure time physical exercise. Changes were tested using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and McNemar tests. No statistically significant changes were found between T0 and T1. In total, 73.7% of the participants felt involved in the WHPP. Changes in the outcome measures were not significantly different between subgroups based on age, nor in subgroups based on feelings of involvedness. The low intensity of the developed program could be an explanation for this lack of significant change. Future studies using the Citizen Science approach in an occupational setting should aim at developing a more intensified program and should test its effectiveness by comparing changes in a (randomized) controlled trial.
蓝领工人的健康状况平均不如白领工人。现有的工作场所健康促进计划(WHPP)在蓝领工人中往往不成功。本研究评估了基于公民科学的 WHPP 对建筑工人目标生活方式行为的影响。从 WHPP 之前(T0)和之后(T1)的问卷中检索到 114 名参与者的数据。结果测量指标是每日水果和蔬菜摄入量以及每周休闲时间体育锻炼的平均和分类变化。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 McNemar 检验测试变化。T0 和 T1 之间没有发现统计学上的显著差异。总的来说,73.7%的参与者觉得自己参与了 WHPP。根据年龄和参与感的不同,结果测量指标的变化在亚组之间没有显著差异。制定的计划强度较低可能是造成这种变化不显著的原因。未来在职业环境中使用公民科学方法的研究应旨在开发更强化的计划,并通过比较(随机)对照试验中的变化来测试其有效性。