Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14009-8.
Many workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) do not reach blue-collar workers. To enhance the fit and reach, a Citizen Science (CS) approach was applied to co-create and implement WHPPs. This study aims to evaluate i) the process of this CS approach and ii) the resulting WHPPs.
The study was performed in two companies: a construction company and a container terminal company. Data were collected by questionnaires, interviews and logbooks. Using the framework of Nielsen and Randall, process measures were categorized in the intervention, context and mental models. Interviews were transcribed and thematically coded using MaxQDA software.
The involvement in the CS approach and co-creating the WHPPs was positively experienced. Information provision, sustained engagement over time and alignment with the workplace's culture resulted in barriers in the CS process. As to the resulting WHPPs, involvement and interaction during the intervention sessions were particularly experienced in small groups. The reach was affected by the unfavorable planning off the WHPPs and external events of re-originations and the covid-19 pandemic.
Continuous information provision and engagement over time, better alignment with the workplace's culture and favorable planning are considered to be important factors for facilitating involvement, reach and satisfaction of the workers in a Citizen science approach to design and implement a WHPP. Further studies continuously monitoring the process of WHPPs using the CS approach could be helpful to anticipate on external factors and increase the adaptability.
Workers were satisfied with the involvement in WHPPs. Organizational and social cultural factors were barriers for the CS approach and its reach. Involvement and interaction in WHPPs were particularly experienced in small grouped sessions. Consequently, contextual and personal factors need be considered in the design and implementation of WHPPs with CS approach among blue-collar workers.
许多工作场所健康促进计划(WHPP)无法覆盖蓝领工人。为了增强适应性和覆盖面,采用公民科学(CS)方法共同制定和实施 WHPP。本研究旨在评估:i)该 CS 方法的过程,ii)由此产生的 WHPP。
该研究在两家公司进行:一家建筑公司和一家集装箱码头公司。通过问卷、访谈和日志收集数据。使用尼尔森和兰德尔的框架,将干预、背景和心理模型中的过程措施进行分类。访谈使用 MaxQDA 软件进行转录和主题编码。
参与 CS 方法和共同制定 WHPP 的体验是积极的。信息提供、随着时间的推移持续参与以及与工作场所文化的一致性导致 CS 过程中的障碍。至于由此产生的 WHPP,干预期间的参与和互动在小团体中特别明显。参与度和互动度受到 WHPP 不利规划、重新起源和 COVID-19 大流行等外部事件的影响。
持续的信息提供和随着时间的推移持续参与、更好地与工作场所文化保持一致以及有利的规划被认为是促进工人参与、覆盖范围和满意度的重要因素,采用 CS 方法来设计和实施 WHPP。使用 CS 方法持续监测 WHPP 过程的进一步研究可能有助于预测外部因素并提高适应性。
工人对参与 WHPP 感到满意。组织和社会文化因素是 CS 方法及其覆盖范围的障碍。WHPP 中的参与和互动在小团体会议中特别明显。因此,在设计和实施 CS 方法的 WHPP 时,需要考虑背景和个人因素。