Suppr超能文献

使用16S宏基因组分析比较健康个体与牙周炎患者在不同口腔采样部位的口腔微生物组成。

Comparison of the oral microbial composition between healthy individuals and periodontitis patients in different oral sampling sites using 16S metagenome profiling.

作者信息

Kim Yeon-Tae, Jeong Jinuk, Mun Seyoung, Yun Kyeongeui, Han Kyudong, Jeong Seong-Nyum

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Korea.

Daejeon Dental Care Center for Persons with Special Needs, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Oct;52(5):394-410. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2200680034.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the microbial composition of 3 types of oral samples through 16S metagenomic sequencing to determine how to resolve some sampling issues that occur during the collection of sub-gingival plaque samples.

METHODS

In total, 20 subjects were recruited. In both the healthy and periodontitis groups, samples of saliva and supra-gingival plaque were collected. Additionally, in the periodontitis group, sub-gingival plaque samples were collected from the deepest periodontal pocket. After DNA extraction from each sample, polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed on the V3-V4 hypervariable region on the 16S rRNA gene, followed by metagenomic sequencing and a bioinformatics analysis.

RESULTS

When comparing the healthy and periodontitis groups in terms of alpha-diversity, the saliva samples demonstrated much more substantial differences in bacterial diversity than the supra-gingival plaque samples. Moreover, in a comparison between the samples in the case group, the diversity score of the saliva samples was higher than that of the supra-gingival plaque samples, and it was similar to that of the sub-gingival plaque samples. In the beta-diversity analysis, the sub-gingival plaque samples exhibited a clustering pattern similar to that of the periodontitis group. Bacterial relative abundance analysis at the species level indicated lower relative frequencies of bacteria in the healthy group than in the periodontitis group. A statistically significant difference in frequency was observed in the saliva samples for specific pathogenic species (, , and ). The saliva samples exhibited a similar relative richness of bacterial communities to that of sub-gingival plaque samples.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 16S oral microbiome study, we confirmed that saliva samples had a microbial composition that was more similar to that of sub-gingival plaque samples than to that of supra-gingival plaque samples within the periodontitis group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过16S宏基因组测序比较3种口腔样本的微生物组成,以确定如何解决龈下菌斑样本采集过程中出现的一些采样问题。

方法

共招募了20名受试者。在健康组和牙周炎组中,均采集了唾液和龈上菌斑样本。此外,在牙周炎组中,从最深的牙周袋中采集龈下菌斑样本。从每个样本中提取DNA后,对16S rRNA基因的V3-V4高变区进行聚合酶链反应扩增,随后进行宏基因组测序和生物信息学分析。

结果

在比较健康组和牙周炎组的α多样性时,唾液样本的细菌多样性差异比龈上菌斑样本大得多。此外,在病例组样本之间的比较中,唾液样本的多样性得分高于龈上菌斑样本,且与龈下菌斑样本相似。在β多样性分析中,龈下菌斑样本呈现出与牙周炎组相似的聚类模式。物种水平的细菌相对丰度分析表明,健康组中细菌的相对频率低于牙周炎组。在唾液样本中,特定致病菌种( 、 和 )的频率存在统计学上的显著差异。唾液样本的细菌群落相对丰富度与龈下菌斑样本相似。

结论

在这项16S口腔微生物组研究中,我们证实,在牙周炎组中,唾液样本的微生物组成与龈下菌斑样本更相似,而与龈上菌斑样本不太相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56da/9614179/33aa6efa2404/jpis-52-394-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验