Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022 Dec;77:102644. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102644. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
The firing rates of individual neurons displaying mixed selectivity are modulated by multiple task variables. When mixed selectivity is nonlinear, it confers an advantage by generating a high-dimensional neural representation that can be flexibly decoded by linear classifiers. Although the advantages of this coding scheme are well accepted, the means of designing an experiment and analyzing the data to test for and characterize mixed selectivity remain unclear. With the growing number of large datasets collected during complex tasks, the mixed selectivity is increasingly observed and is challenging to interpret correctly. We review recent approaches for analyzing and interpreting neural datasets and clarify the theoretical implications of mixed selectivity in the variety of forms that have been reported in the literature. We also aim to provide a practical guide for determining whether a neural population has linear or nonlinear mixed selectivity and whether this mixing leads to a categorical or category-free representation.
表现出混合选择性的单个神经元的发放率受到多个任务变量的调节。当混合选择性是非线性的时,它通过生成可以由线性分类器灵活解码的高维神经表示来提供优势。尽管这种编码方案的优势已被广泛接受,但设计实验和分析数据以测试和表征混合选择性的方法仍不清楚。随着在复杂任务中收集的大量大型数据集的增加,混合选择性越来越常见,并且正确解释具有挑战性。我们回顾了最近用于分析和解释神经数据集的方法,并阐明了文献中报道的各种形式的混合选择性的理论意义。我们还旨在提供一个实用指南,用于确定神经群体是否具有线性或非线性混合选择性,以及这种混合是否导致分类或无分类表示。