Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley 94720.
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Jan;106(1):132-150. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21791. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
Concerns about antibiotic resistant infections in the United States have called for reduction of antibiotic use in livestock, including dairy cattle. Although effective in curbing antibiotic use, universal organic dairy farming would be impractical and unattainable due to its high land and premium demands. The US Department of Agriculture's organic certification, which completely eliminates antibiotic use in milk production, also raises animal welfare concerns, as it could discourage the use of antibiotics even to treat indicated diseases. Therefore, a proposed alternative for US consumers is a label indicating the responsible antibiotic use (RAU) - not complete elimination - that would minimize antibiotics more than conventional (unlabeled) milk and maximize animal welfare more than organic milk. Our goal was to determine consumers' (1) self-reported preference and (2) willingness to pay for this hypothetical RAU label of milk relative to existing substitutes in organic and unlabeled fluid milk. We conducted (1) a nationally representative survey of US adults and (2) a randomized non-hypothetical experimental Becker-Degroot-Marschak auction with real money and real milk. Although almost half of the survey participants (48.5%) responded that they would buy a RAU-labeled milk, consumers in the experimental auction refused to pay a significant premium for the milk compared with unlabeled milk (mean willingness to pay (95% confidence interval) per half-gallon: $1.92 ($1.65-$2.19) for RAU-labeled milk versus $1.86 ($1.58-$2.13) for unlabeled milk). These results suggest that consumers' survey-identified preferences for RAU-labeled milk could reflect either social desirability bias or a genuine preference for which, however, consumers simply will not pay a significant premium. The study provides preliminary data for future exploration of marketability of the proposed RAU label in the United States and demonstrates the benefits of using complementary survey and experimental auction approaches to understand the potential market for a new dairy product.
人们对美国出现的抗生素耐药感染问题表示担忧,呼吁减少包括奶牛养殖业在内的牲畜抗生素使用量。尽管有机奶牛养殖在减少抗生素使用方面非常有效,但由于其对土地和饲料的高要求,这种做法在实践中并不可行,也无法实现。美国农业部的有机认证完全禁止在牛奶生产中使用抗生素,这也引发了动物福利方面的担忧,因为这可能会阻止人们在治疗疾病时使用抗生素。因此,为美国消费者提出的替代方案是一种标签,表明抗生素的使用是负责任的(RAU),而不是完全消除,这样可以最大限度地减少抗生素的使用,比传统(未贴标签)牛奶更有优势,同时最大限度地提高动物福利,比有机牛奶更有优势。我们的目标是确定消费者(1)对这种假设的 RAU 标签牛奶的偏好,以及(2)与有机牛奶和未贴标签的液态奶相比,他们愿意为此标签支付多少钱。我们进行了(1)一项针对美国成年人的全国代表性调查,以及(2)一项使用真实货币和真实牛奶的随机非假设贝克尔-德格鲁特-马沙克拍卖实验。尽管近一半的调查参与者(48.5%)表示他们会购买 RAU 标签牛奶,但与未贴标签的牛奶相比,实验拍卖中的消费者不愿意为此支付更高的溢价(每半加仑的平均支付意愿(95%置信区间):RAU 标签牛奶为 1.92 美元(1.65-2.19 美元),未贴标签牛奶为 1.86 美元(1.58-2.13 美元))。这些结果表明,消费者在调查中对 RAU 标签牛奶的偏好可能反映了社会期望偏差,或者反映了他们对这种牛奶的真正偏好,但消费者不愿意为此支付更高的溢价。这项研究为未来在美国探索 RAU 标签的市场潜力提供了初步数据,并展示了使用补充调查和实验拍卖方法来了解新产品潜在市场的好处。