College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Feb;64(2):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.09.011. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Snus, dissolvable, and traditional smokeless tobacco product use is often amalgamated in youth epidemiologic research despite differences across these products. Prevalence, trends, and correlates of U.S. youth use across different classes of oral tobacco products are unknown.
Using 2011-2020 National Youth Tobacco Survey (N=193,933) data, the authors tested for cross-year linear and quadratic trends in the weighted prevalence of ever and current use of traditional smokeless tobacco, snus, and dissolvable tobacco. Multivariable logistic regressions estimated the demographic and tobacco use factors associated with the use of different oral tobacco products in 2020. Analyses were conducted in 2022.
During 2011-2020, there were declines in the prevalence of ever use of traditional smokeless tobacco (11.0% to 5.6%; linear trend, p<0.0001) and snus (5.2% to 2.4%; p<0.0001) but no change in ever dissolvable tobacco use (0.8%-1.2%). In 2020, an estimated 1,546,000 U.S. youth ever used traditional smokeless tobacco (7.7% high school, 3.0% middle school), 662,000 ever used snus (high school: 3.5%, middle school: 1.0%), and 326,000 ever used dissolvables (high school: 1.5%, middle school: 0.8%). In 2020, females and non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had lower smokeless or snus ever use odds than males and non-Hispanic Whites, respectively, whereas sexual minorities (than heterosexuals) or those speaking a language other than English at home were more likely to report ever use of dissolvable tobacco. Flavored tobacco use was common, particularly for dissolvable current users (72.8% used any flavor).
Differences in the epidemiology of oral tobacco use across product types among U.S. youth suggest that oral tobacco products should be disaggregated in future research and policy strategies.
尽管不同类型的无烟烟草制品在使用上存在差异,但在青年流行病学研究中,鼻烟、可溶解和传统无烟烟草制品的使用通常被混为一谈。目前,尚不清楚美国不同类型的口腔烟草制品在青少年中的使用情况、趋势和相关因素。
本研究利用 2011-2020 年全国青少年烟草调查(N=193933)的数据,检验了传统无烟烟草制品、鼻烟和可溶解烟草在不同年份的使用情况(曾用和现用)的加权流行率的线性和二次趋势。多变量逻辑回归估计了 2020 年不同口腔烟草制品使用与人口统计学和烟草使用因素之间的关联。分析于 2022 年进行。
在 2011-2020 年期间,传统无烟烟草制品(从不使用的 11.0%降至 5.6%;线性趋势,p<0.0001)和鼻烟(从不使用的 5.2%降至 2.4%;p<0.0001)的使用率下降,但可溶解烟草的使用率无变化(0.8%-1.2%)。2020 年,美国约有 154.6 万名青少年曾使用传统无烟烟草制品(高中:7.7%,初中:3.0%),66.2 万名青少年曾使用鼻烟(高中:3.5%,初中:1.0%),32.6 万名青少年曾使用可溶解烟草(高中:1.5%,初中:0.8%)。2020 年,与男性和非西班牙裔白人相比,女性和非西班牙裔黑人及西班牙裔的无烟或鼻烟使用率较低,而性少数群体(同性恋者)或在家中讲其他语言的人更有可能报告使用可溶解烟草。调味烟草的使用很普遍,尤其是可溶解烟草的现用者(72.8%使用任何口味)。
美国青少年对不同类型的口腔烟草制品的使用在流行病学上存在差异,这表明在未来的研究和政策策略中,应将口腔烟草制品进行分类。