• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察可及性和时间间隔对条件自动化驾驶中接管风险的影响。

Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving.

机构信息

Tongji Architectural Design (Group) Co., Ltd., 1230 Siping Road, Yangpu, Shanghai 200092, China.

Shanghai Research Center for Smart Mobility and Road Safety, Shanghai 200092, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113904.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113904
PMID:36360784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9655346/
Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of visibility and time headway on the takeover performance in L3 automated driving. Both non-critical and critical driving scenarios were considered by changing the acceleration value of the leading vehicle. A driving simulator experiment with 18 driving scenarios was conducted and 30 participants complete the experiment. Based on the data obtained from the experiment, the takeover reaction time, takeover control time, and takeover responses were analyzed. The minimum Time-To-Collision (Min TTC) was used to measure the takeover risk level and a binary logit model for takeover risk levels was estimated. The results indicate that the visibility distance (VD) has no significant effects on the takeover control time, while the time headway (THW) and the acceleration of the leading vehicle (ALV) could affect the takeover control time significantly; most of the participants would push the gas pedal to accelerate the ego vehicle as the takeover response under non-critical scenarios, while braking was the dominant takeover response for participants in critical driving scenarios; decreasing the TCT and taking the appropriate takeover response would reduce the takeover risk significantly, so it is suggested that the automation system should provide the driver with the urgency of the situation ahead and the tips for takeover responses by audio prompts or the head-up display. This study is expected to facilitate the overall understanding of the effects of visibility and time headway on the takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.

摘要

本研究旨在考察在 L3 自动化驾驶中,可见性和时距对接管性能的影响。通过改变前车的加速度值,考虑了非关键和关键驾驶场景。进行了一项包含 18 个驾驶场景的驾驶模拟器实验,有 30 名参与者完成了实验。基于实验中获得的数据,分析了接管反应时间、接管控制时间和接管响应。最小碰撞时间 (Min TTC) 用于衡量接管风险水平,并对接管风险水平进行了二元逻辑回归模型估计。结果表明,可见距离 (VD) 对接管控制时间没有显著影响,而时距 (THW) 和前车加速度 (ALV) 显著影响接管控制时间;在非关键场景下,大多数参与者会踩油门加速自动驾驶车辆,而在关键驾驶场景下,制动是参与者的主要接管响应;减少 TCT 并采取适当的接管响应会显著降低接管风险,因此建议自动化系统通过音频提示或抬头显示器向驾驶员提供前方情况的紧急程度和接管响应提示。本研究有望促进对条件自动化驾驶中可见性和时距对接管性能影响的全面理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/d37467cecf18/ijerph-19-13904-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/b3097c99415a/ijerph-19-13904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/31f07fd10f12/ijerph-19-13904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/66048d8d96e5/ijerph-19-13904-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/7cdd59657b9d/ijerph-19-13904-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/91ebf7cdf23c/ijerph-19-13904-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/12e3f4b73565/ijerph-19-13904-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/08f5ce5b33d6/ijerph-19-13904-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/b87a2ee2037f/ijerph-19-13904-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/d37467cecf18/ijerph-19-13904-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/b3097c99415a/ijerph-19-13904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/31f07fd10f12/ijerph-19-13904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/66048d8d96e5/ijerph-19-13904-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/7cdd59657b9d/ijerph-19-13904-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/91ebf7cdf23c/ijerph-19-13904-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/12e3f4b73565/ijerph-19-13904-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/08f5ce5b33d6/ijerph-19-13904-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/b87a2ee2037f/ijerph-19-13904-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/9655346/d37467cecf18/ijerph-19-13904-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving.考察可及性和时间间隔对条件自动化驾驶中接管风险的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113904.
2
Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?提高有条件自动化驾驶的安全性:在具有不同危险可见度的危险场景中,更多接管请求视觉信息是否会产生影响?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;205:107687. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107687. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety.接管速度越快是否意味着越好?一项关于紧急情况和接管请求前置时间对接管性能和安全性影响的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jun;171:106647. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106647. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.分析生理反应作为有条件自动驾驶中驾驶员接管准备程度的指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107372. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107372. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.不可靠自动化、非驾驶相关任务以及接管时间预算对驾驶员接管性能和工作量的影响。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):182-197. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2069868. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
The impact of non-driving related tasks on the development of driver sleepiness and takeover performances in prolonged automated driving.非驾驶相关任务对长时间自动驾驶中驾驶员困倦和接管性能的影响。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.接管请求提前期对驾驶员从高速公路手动驶出的情境意识的影响:基于网络的 3 级自动驾驶汽车研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106593. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106593. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.自动驾驶接管安全中的驾驶员行为和心理负荷:ACT-R 预测建模方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):381-389. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2300640. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
A Bayesian Regression Analysis of the Effects of Alert Presence and Scenario Criticality on Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance.关于警报存在和场景关键性对自动驾驶车辆接管性能影响的贝叶斯回归分析。
Hum Factors. 2023 Mar;65(2):288-305. doi: 10.1177/00187208211010004. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.驾驶员在自动驾驶紧急制动过程中的接管行为——时距、牵引力使用和对自动化的信任的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106725. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106725. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety.接管速度越快是否意味着越好?一项关于紧急情况和接管请求前置时间对接管性能和安全性影响的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jun;171:106647. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106647. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
2
Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.分析半自动驾驶汽车接管行为的影响因素及工作负荷变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 6;19(3):1834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031834.
3
How Does Approaching a Lead Vehicle and Monitoring Request Affect Drivers' Takeover Performance? A Simulated Driving Study with Functional MRI.
接近前车和监控请求如何影响驾驶员接管性能?一项使用功能磁共振成像的模拟驾驶研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010412.
4
Reasonable driving speed limits based on recognition time in a dynamic low-visibility environment related to fog-A driving simulator study.基于雾天相关动态低能见度环境下识别时间的合理驾驶速度限制——驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106060. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106060. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Takeover Performance During Conditionally Automated Driving.条件自动化驾驶中接管性能的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Factors. 2022 Nov;64(7):1227-1260. doi: 10.1177/0018720820976476. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Examining the effect of road horizontal alignment on the speed of semi-automated vehicles.考察道路平面对半自动驾驶车辆速度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105732. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105732. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
7
What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?当自动驾驶车辆的驾驶员在关键制动情况下接管控制权时,会发生什么情况?
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105588. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105588. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.理解高事故风险驾驶员在条件自动化驾驶期间的接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Aug;143:105543. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105543. Epub 2020 May 31.
9
Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving.认知和视觉负荷对自动驾驶接管请求(TOR)后驾驶性能的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103074. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality.条件自动驾驶高速公路上的非关键状态转换:非驾驶相关任务对接管时间和接管质量的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):596-613. doi: 10.1177/0018720818824002. Epub 2019 Jan 28.