Desperito Elise, Schwartz Lawrence, Capaccione Kathleen M, Collins Brian T, Jamabawalikar Sachin, Peng Boyu, Patrizio Rebecca, Salvatore Mary M
Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of South Florida Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(11):1699. doi: 10.3390/life12111699.
Background: We report the results of our retrospective analysis of the ability of standard chest CT scans to correctly diagnose cancer in the breast. Methods: Four hundred and fifty-three consecutive women with chest CT scans (contrast and non-contrast) preceding mammograms within one year comprise the study population. All chest CT images were reviewed by an experienced fellowship-trained chest radiologist and mammograms by an experienced fellowship-trained mammographer without the benefit of prior or ancillary studies; only four mammographic views were included for analysis. The size, location, and shape of breast masses were documented; on CT, the average Hounsfield units were measured. On both imaging modalities, the presence of lymphadenopathy, architectural distortion, skin thickening, and microcalcifications were recorded. Ultimately, the interpreting radiologist was asked to decide if a biopsy was indicated, and these recommendations were correlated with the patient’s outcome. Findings: Nineteen of four hundred and fifty-three patients had breast cancer at the time of the mammography. Breast masses were the most common finding on chest CT, leading to the recommendation for biopsy. Hounsfield units were the most important feature for discerning benign from malignant masses. CT sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for breast cancer detection was 84.21%, 99.3%, and 98.68% compared to 78.95%, 93.78%, and 93.16% for four-view mammography. Chest CT scans with or without contrast had similar outcomes for specificity and accuracy, but sensitivity was slightly less without contrast. Chest CT alone, without the benefit of prior exams and patient recall, correctly diagnosed cancer with a p-value of <0.0001 compared to mammography with the same limitations. Conclusion: Chest CT accurately diagnosed breast cancer with few false positives and negatives and did so without the need for patient recall for additional imaging.
我们报告了对标准胸部CT扫描正确诊断乳腺癌能力的回顾性分析结果。方法:453名在一年内先于乳房X光检查进行胸部CT扫描(增强和非增强)的连续女性构成了研究人群。所有胸部CT图像均由一位经验丰富的经过专科培训的胸部放射科医生进行评估,乳房X光检查则由一位经验丰富的经过专科培训的乳腺造影技师进行评估,且不参考先前或辅助检查结果;仅纳入四张乳房X光片视图进行分析。记录乳房肿块的大小、位置和形状;在CT上,测量平均亨氏单位。在两种成像方式上,均记录有无淋巴结病、结构扭曲、皮肤增厚和微钙化。最终,要求解读影像的放射科医生决定是否需要进行活检,并将这些建议与患者的结局进行关联。结果:在进行乳房X光检查时,453名患者中有19名患有乳腺癌。乳房肿块是胸部CT上最常见的发现,从而导致建议进行活检。亨氏单位是区分良性和恶性肿块的最重要特征。与四视图乳房X光检查的78.95%、93.78%和93.16%相比,CT检测乳腺癌的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为84.21%、99.3%和98.68%。有或无增强的胸部CT扫描在特异性和准确性方面结果相似,但无增强时敏感性略低。在没有先前检查和患者召回的情况下,单纯胸部CT与具有相同局限性的乳房X光检查相比,正确诊断癌症的p值<0.0001。结论:胸部CT能准确诊断乳腺癌,假阳性和假阴性较少,且无需召回患者进行额外成像检查。