Faculty of Medicine, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, UnB, Asa Norte, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil.
Institute for Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Horacio Macedo, S/N, Ilha do Fundão-Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-598, RJ, Brazil.
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 3;14(21):4640. doi: 10.3390/nu14214640.
Background: It is still controversial whether the joint effect of Metabolic syndrome (MetS) components is greater than that expected based on their independent effects, regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents. We evaluated additive and multiplicative interactions between pair-wise combinations of metabolic syndrome components regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: We studied 37,815 Brazilian adolescents from a national school-based survey, The Study of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adolescents (Portuguese acronym, ERICA). A Poisson regression model was used to calculate sex-, age-, obesity-, smoking status-, sedentary behavior-, physical inactivity-, alcoholic consumption- and socioeconomic status-adjusted prevalence ratios to evaluate both additive and multiplicative interactions. Results: In the comparison of observed and expected joint effects, relative excess risk due to additive interaction (RERI) for high triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high triglycerides and elevated waist circumference, elevated waist circumference and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and elevated waist circumference and high blood pressure were 2.53 (−0.41, 5.46), 2.86 (−2.89, 8.61), 1.71 (−1.05, 4.46) and 0.97 (0.15, 1.79), respectively, thus suggesting additive interactions. Multiplicative interactions for those pairs of components were also observed, as expressed by interaction ratios > 1.0. Conclusions: The joint presence of some of the components of MetS showed a greater association with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents than expected from the sum of their isolated effects. From a public health perspective, preventing one of the components of the pairs that interact may result in a greater reduction in the prevalence of T2DM than focusing on an individual component that does not interact with another component.
代谢综合征(MetS)各组分联合效应对青少年 2 型糖尿病的影响是否大于其各自独立效应仍存在争议。我们评估了代谢综合征各组分之间两两组合对 2 型糖尿病的相加和相乘交互作用。
我们对巴西一项全国性的基于学校的调查,即青少年心血管风险因素研究(ERICA)中的 37815 名青少年进行了研究。采用泊松回归模型计算了性别、年龄、肥胖、吸烟状况、久坐行为、体力活动不足、饮酒和社会经济地位调整后的患病率比值,以评估相加和相乘交互作用。
在观察到的和预期的联合效应比较中,高甘油三酯和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高甘油三酯和腰围升高、腰围升高和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇以及腰围升高和高血压之间的归因于相加交互作用的超额相对危险度(RERI)分别为 2.53(-0.41,5.46)、2.86(-2.89,8.61)、1.71(-1.05,4.46)和 0.97(0.15,1.79),提示存在相加交互作用。这些组分对的相乘交互作用也被观察到,表现为交互比>1.0。
一些代谢综合征组分的共同存在与青少年 2 型糖尿病的患病率之间的关联大于其各自孤立效应的总和。从公共卫生的角度来看,预防相互作用的组分对中的一个组分可能比关注与另一个组分不相互作用的单个组分更能降低 2 型糖尿病的患病率。