• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Novel Hidden Markov Approach to Studying Dynamic Functional Connectivity States in Human Neuroimaging.一种研究人类神经影像学中动态功能连接状态的新型隐马尔可夫方法。
Brain Connect. 2023 Apr;13(3):154-163. doi: 10.1089/brain.2022.0031. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Improved state change estimation in dynamic functional connectivity using hidden semi-Markov models.利用隐半马尔可夫模型改进动态功能连接中的状态变化估计。
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:243-257. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
3
Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI.用于估计功能磁共振成像中时变功能连接性的贝叶斯切换因子分析
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:271-290. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.083. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
4
Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.解析静息态功能磁共振连接成像中的时变波动。
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:437-455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
5
Resting state dynamics meets anatomical structure: Temporal multiple kernel learning (tMKL) model.静息态动力学与解剖结构相结合:时间多核学习(tMKL)模型。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:609-620. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.054. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
Characterizing and Differentiating Brain State Dynamics via Hidden Markov Models.通过隐马尔可夫模型表征和区分脑状态动力学
Brain Topogr. 2015 Sep;28(5):666-679. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0406-2. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Brain state dynamics differ between eyes open and eyes closed rest.大脑在睁眼休息和闭眼休息时的状态动态不同。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jul 15;45(10):e26746. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26746.
8
Modeling regional dynamics in low-frequency fluctuation and its application to Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis.建模低频波动的区域动力学及其在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的应用。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:669-686. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.043. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
9
Estimating Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity With a Sparse Hidden Markov Model.基于稀疏隐马尔可夫模型估计动态功能脑连接
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Feb;39(2):488-498. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2929959. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
10
Improved dynamic functional connectivity estimation with an alternating hidden Markov model.基于交替隐马尔可夫模型的改进动态功能连接估计
Cogn Neurodyn. 2023 Oct;17(5):1381-1398. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09874-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifespan oscillatory dynamics in lexical production: A population-based MEG resting-state analysis.词汇生成中的寿命振荡动力学:基于人群的脑磁图静息态分析。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Apr 28;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00551. eCollection 2025.
2
Targeted Time-Varying Functional Connectivity.靶向时变功能连接
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Mar;46(4):e70157. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70157.
3
Dynamic transient brain states in preschoolers mirror parental report of behavior and emotion regulation.学龄前儿童动态瞬变脑状态反映了父母对其行为和情绪调节的报告。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Oct;45(14):e70011. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70011.
4
Studying time-resolved functional connectivity via communication theory: on the complementary nature of phase synchronization and sliding window Pearson correlation.通过通信理论研究时间分辨功能连接性:关于相位同步和滑动窗口皮尔逊相关性的互补性质。
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 22:2024.06.12.598720. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.12.598720.
5
A predictor-informed multi-subject bayesian approach for dynamic functional connectivity.基于预测信息的多体贝叶斯动态功能连接方法
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298651. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A new model for simultaneous dimensionality reduction and time-varying functional connectivity estimation.一种新的同时降维和时变功能连接估计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Apr 16;17(4):e1008580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008580. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Behavioural relevance of spontaneous, transient brain network interactions in fMRI.功能磁共振成像中自发、瞬时脑网络相互作用的行为相关性。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117713. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117713. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI.静息态功能磁共振成像中时变功能连接性研究的问题与争议
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Feb 1;4(1):30-69. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00116. eCollection 2020.
4
Discovery of key whole-brain transitions and dynamics during human wakefulness and non-REM sleep.在人类清醒和非快速眼动睡眠期间关键全脑转变和动力学的发现。
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 4;10(1):1035. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08934-3.
5
Spontaneous cortical activity transiently organises into frequency specific phase-coupling networks.自发性皮质活动会暂时组织成具有特定频率的相位耦合网络。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 30;9(1):2987. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05316-z.
6
Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time.大脑网络动力学在时间上是分层组织的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12827-12832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705120114. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task.从静息态和任务态大数据中发现动态脑网络。
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):646-656. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.077. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Spatiotemporal Modeling of Brain Dynamics Using Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gaussian Hidden Markov Model.使用高斯隐马尔可夫模型的静息态功能磁共振成像对脑动力学进行时空建模
Brain Connect. 2016 May;6(4):326-34. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0398. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
9
Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data.电生理数据中频谱分辨的快速瞬态脑状态。
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 1;126:81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.047. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
Characterizing and Differentiating Brain State Dynamics via Hidden Markov Models.通过隐马尔可夫模型表征和区分脑状态动力学
Brain Topogr. 2015 Sep;28(5):666-679. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0406-2. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

一种研究人类神经影像学中动态功能连接状态的新型隐马尔可夫方法。

A Novel Hidden Markov Approach to Studying Dynamic Functional Connectivity States in Human Neuroimaging.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.

Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.

出版信息

Brain Connect. 2023 Apr;13(3):154-163. doi: 10.1089/brain.2022.0031. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1089/brain.2022.0031
PMID:36367193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10079241/
Abstract

Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a popular choice to extract and examine recurring patterns of activity or functional connectivity in neuroimaging data, both in terms of spatial patterns and their temporal progression. Although many diverse HMMs have been applied to neuroimaging data, most have defined states based on activity levels (intensity-based [IB] states) rather than patterns of functional connectivity between brain areas (connectivity-based states), which is problematic if we want to understand connectivity dynamics: IB states are unlikely to provide comprehensive information about dynamic connectivity patterns. We addressed this problem by introducing a new HMM that defines states based on full functional connectivity (FFC) profiles among brain regions. We empirically explored the behavior of this new model in comparison to existing approaches based on IB or summed functional connectivity states using the Human Connectome Project unrelated 100 functional magnetic resonance imaging "resting-state" dataset. Our FFC model discovered connectivity states with more distinguishable (i.e., unique and separable from each other) patterns than previous approaches, and recovered simulated connectivity-based states more faithfully than the other models tested. Thus, if our goal is to extract and interpret connectivity states in neuroimaging data, our new model outperforms previous methods, which miss crucial information about the evolution of functional connectivity in the brain. Impact statement Hidden Markov models (HMMs) can be used to investigate brain states noninvasively. Previous models "recover" connectivity from intensity-based hidden states, or from connectivity "summed" across nodes. In this study, we introduce a novel connectivity-based HMM and show how it can reveal true connectivity hidden states under minimal assumptions.

摘要

隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)是一种从神经影像学数据中提取和检查活动或功能连接重复模式的常用方法,既可以从空间模式方面,也可以从时间演变方面进行研究。尽管已经有许多不同的 HMM 应用于神经影像学数据,但大多数模型都是基于活动水平(基于强度[IB]的状态)而不是大脑区域之间功能连接模式(基于连接的状态)来定义状态,如果我们想要了解连接动力学,这就存在问题:IB 状态不太可能提供关于动态连接模式的全面信息。我们通过引入一种新的 HMM 来解决这个问题,该模型基于大脑区域之间的全功能连接(FFC)分布来定义状态。我们使用人类连接组计划无关的 100 个功能磁共振成像“静息状态”数据集,对这个新模型与基于 IB 或总功能连接状态的现有方法进行了实证比较。我们的 FFC 模型发现的连接状态具有更可区分的模式(即彼此独特且可分离),比以前的方法更能真实地恢复模拟的基于连接的状态。因此,如果我们的目标是从神经影像学数据中提取和解释连接状态,那么我们的新模型优于以前的方法,因为后者会错过有关大脑功能连接演变的重要信息。