Radiology Department, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Jheronimus Academy of Data Science, Sint Janssingel 92, 5211 DA, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):1575-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09205-4. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
To assess how an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm performs against five experienced musculoskeletal radiologists in diagnosing scaphoid fractures and whether it aids their diagnosis on conventional multi-view radiographs.
Four datasets of conventional hand, wrist, and scaphoid radiographs were retrospectively acquired at two hospitals (hospitals A and B). Dataset 1 (12,990 radiographs from 3353 patients, hospital A) and dataset 2 (1117 radiographs from 394 patients, hospital B) were used for training and testing a scaphoid localization and laterality classification component. Dataset 3 (4316 radiographs from 840 patients, hospital A) and dataset 4 (688 radiographs from 209 patients, hospital B) were used for training and testing the fracture detector. The algorithm was compared with the radiologists in an observer study. Evaluation metrics included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), area under the characteristic operating curve (AUC), Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), fracture localization precision, and reading time.
The algorithm detected scaphoid fractures with a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 93%, PPV of 81%, and AUC of 0.88. The AUC of the algorithm did not differ from each radiologist (0.87 [radiologists' mean], p ≥ .05). AI assistance improved five out of ten pairs of inter-observer Cohen's κ agreements (p < .05) and reduced reading time in four radiologists (p < .001), but did not improve other metrics in the majority of radiologists (p ≥ .05).
The AI algorithm detects scaphoid fractures on conventional multi-view radiographs at the level of five experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and could significantly shorten their reading time.
• An artificial intelligence algorithm automatically detects scaphoid fractures on conventional multi-view radiographs at the same level of five experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. • There is preliminary evidence that automated scaphoid fracture detection can significantly shorten the reading time of musculoskeletal radiologists.
评估人工智能(AI)算法在诊断舟状骨骨折方面的表现,并确定其是否有助于在常规多视图 X 光片上进行诊断。
在两家医院(医院 A 和 B)回顾性地采集了四个手部、腕部和舟状骨常规 X 光片数据集。数据集 1(来自 3353 名患者的 12990 张 X 光片,来自医院 A)和数据集 2(来自 394 名患者的 1117 张 X 光片,来自医院 B)用于训练和测试舟状骨定位和侧别分类组件。数据集 3(来自 840 名患者的 4316 张 X 光片,来自医院 A)和数据集 4(来自 209 名患者的 688 张 X 光片,来自医院 B)用于训练和测试骨折探测器。该算法与放射科医生进行了观察者研究比较。评估指标包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、特征操作曲线下面积(AUC)、Cohen's kappa 系数(κ)、骨折定位精度和阅读时间。
该算法检测舟状骨骨折的敏感性为 72%,特异性为 93%,PPV 为 81%,AUC 为 0.88。该算法的 AUC 与每位放射科医生(放射科医生的平均 AUC 为 0.87,p≥0.05)无差异。AI 辅助提高了十位观察者中五位的 Cohen's κ 一致性(p<0.05),并降低了四位放射科医生的阅读时间(p<0.001),但在大多数放射科医生中并未提高其他指标(p≥0.05)。
AI 算法可在常规多视图 X 光片上检测舟状骨骨折,与五名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生的水平相当,并且可以显著缩短他们的阅读时间。
• 人工智能算法可在常规多视图 X 光片上自动检测舟状骨骨折,与五名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生的水平相当。• 有初步证据表明,自动化的舟状骨骨折检测可以显著缩短肌肉骨骼放射科医生的阅读时间。