Suppr超能文献

强光疗法作为治疗多发性硬化相关疲劳的非药物治疗选择:一项随机假对照试验。

Bright light therapy as a non-pharmacological treatment option for multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: A randomized sham-controlled trial.

作者信息

Voggenberger Lisa, Böck Marion, Moser Doris, Lorbeer Gudrun, Altmann Patrick, Leutmezer Fritz, Berger Thomas, Seidel Stefan

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Nov 7;8(4):20552173221133262. doi: 10.1177/20552173221133262. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a common symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) that significantly impairs quality of life. Bright light therapy may be a cheap treatment option with little to no adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of bright light therapy as a treatment option for MS-related fatigue.

METHODS

This was randomized sham-controlled trial including 26 pwMS with a Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score ≥36. Participants were assigned to receive either bright white light therapy ( = 13) or dim red light (sham-intervention;  = 13). Participants used the respective intervention for 30 min each morning for two weeks, followed by a two-week washout period. The primary endpoint was the difference in FSS scores following light treatment as calculated by analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in FSS (F(1,23) = 2.39,  = .136, partial ⴄ = .094). However, FSS scores generally improved over the course of the study in a clinically relevant manner.

CONCLUSION

Bright light therapy decreased FSS scores over the course of this study. However, this effect was not significant in comparison to a sham intervention.

摘要

背景

疲劳是多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)的常见症状,会严重损害生活质量。强光疗法可能是一种廉价的治疗选择,几乎没有不良事件。

目的

评估强光疗法作为治疗MS相关疲劳的有效性。

方法

这是一项随机假对照试验,纳入26名疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)评分≥36的pwMS患者。参与者被分配接受亮白光疗法(n = 13)或暗红色光(假干预;n = 13)。参与者每天早上使用各自的干预措施30分钟,持续两周,随后是两周的洗脱期。主要终点是通过协方差分析计算的光照治疗后FSS评分的差异。

结果

FSS无显著差异(F(1,23) = 2.39,P = .136,偏η² = .094)。然而,在研究过程中,FSS评分总体上以临床相关的方式有所改善。

结论

在本研究过程中,强光疗法降低了FSS评分。然而,与假干预相比,这种效果并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验