Rojas Roberto, Hickmann Maxi, Wolf Svenja, Kolassa Iris-Tatjana, Behnke Alexander
University Psychotherapeutic Outpatient Clinic, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Clinical and Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Clin Psychol Eur. 2022 Mar 31;4(1):e6133. doi: 10.32872/cpe.6133. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Emergency Medical Services personnel (EMSP) are recurrently exposed to chronic and traumatic stressors in their occupation. Effective coping with occupational stressors plays a key role in enabling their health and overall well-being. In this study, we examined the habitual use of coping strategies in EMSP and analyzed associations of coping with the personnel's health and well-being.
A total of N = 106 German Red Cross EMSP participated in a cross-sectional survey involving standardized questionnaires to report habitual use of different coping strategies (using the Brief-COPE), their work-related stress, work-related self-efficacy, job satisfaction, as well as mental and physical stress symptoms.
A confirmatory factor analysis corroborated seven coping factors which have been identified in a previous study among Italian emergency workers. Correlation analyses indicated the coping factor "self-criticism" is associated with more work-related stress, lower job satisfaction, and higher depressive, posttraumatic, and physical stress symptoms. Although commonly viewed as adaptive coping, the coping factors "support/venting", "active coping/planning", "humor", "religion", and "positive reappraisal" were not related to health and well-being in EMSP. Exploratory correlation analyses suggested that only "acceptance" was linked to better well-being and self-efficacy in EMSP.
Our results emphasize the need for in-depth investigation of adaptive coping in EMSP to advance occupation-specific prevention measures.
紧急医疗服务人员(EMSP)在其职业中反复暴露于慢性和创伤性应激源。有效应对职业应激源对他们的健康和整体幸福感起着关键作用。在本研究中,我们调查了EMSP应对策略的习惯性使用情况,并分析了应对方式与人员健康和幸福感之间的关联。
共有N = 106名德国红十字会EMSP参与了一项横断面调查,该调查涉及标准化问卷,以报告不同应对策略的习惯性使用情况(使用简易应对方式问卷)、他们的工作相关压力、工作相关自我效能感、工作满意度以及心理和生理压力症状。
验证性因素分析证实了先前在意大利急救人员研究中确定的七个应对因素。相关分析表明,应对因素“自我批评”与更多的工作相关压力、更低的工作满意度以及更高的抑郁、创伤后和身体压力症状相关。尽管通常被视为适应性应对方式,但应对因素“支持/宣泄”、“积极应对/计划”、“幽默”、“宗教”和“积极重新评价”与EMSP的健康和幸福感无关。探索性相关分析表明,只有“接受”与EMSP更好的幸福感和自我效能感相关。
我们的结果强调需要深入研究EMSP中的适应性应对方式,以推进针对特定职业的预防措施。